Article title

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

SEICAT and the capability approach: translating reported impacts into impact scores

Relevance of non-preferred, burdensome activities and novel, preferred activities to SEICAT

Constituents of well-being

The hierarchical nature of activities – at what level should an activity be assessed?

Defining activity size – who is the community of interest?

Understanding the relevant spatial and temporal scales

Terms used to describe impact categories

Generating detailed and transparent SEICAT assessments

Future directions: structuring surveys to capture SEICAT data

Acknowledgements

References

Supplementary material