Principal component analysis of LP and SP across four treatments (HLHN, HWHN, HLLN, and LLHN) based on 13 eco-physiological traits projected on the first two axes. The traits on each axis are the main drivers of the variation explained by that axis. The percentage of the variance explained by each principal component is shown in brackets. There was no determination of leaf chemistry for treatments that are not included in this PCA because of insufficient leaf materials. Dotted lines connect the LP and SP forms under similar treatments for the sake of comparison.

 
 
  Part of: Buru JC, Osunkoya OO, Dhileepan K, Firn J, Scharaschkin T (2019) Eco-physiological performance may contribute to differential success of two forms of an invasive vine, Dolichandra unguis-cati, in Australia. NeoBiota 46: 23-50. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.46.33917