Editorial |
Corresponding author: Hervé Jactel ( herve.jactel@inrae.fr ) Academic editor: Ingolf Kühn
© 2023 Hervé Jactel, Andrea Battisti, Manuela Branco, Jacob C. Douma, Marc Kenis, Christophe Orazio, Christelle Robinet, Alberto Santini, Anna Sapundzhieva, M. Lukas Seehausen, Pavel Stoev.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Jactel H, Battisti A, Branco M, Douma JC, Kenis M, Orazio C, Robinet C, Santini A, Sapundzhieva A, Seehausen ML, Stoev P (2023) Management options for non-native forest pests along their invasion pathways. In: Jactel H, Orazio C, Robinet C, Douma JC, Santini A, Battisti A, Branco M, Seehausen L, Kenis M (Eds) Conceptual and technical innovations to better manage invasions of alien pests and pathogens in forests. NeoBiota 84: 1-7. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.84.104682
|
Not a single year goes by without European forests being invaded by new alien species of insect herbivore or pathogenic fungi. This ever-increasing flow of alien pests (
The invasion process has four main stages, starting with the arrival of individuals (propagules) in a new territory, sometimes followed by a phase of establishment of a population, and its development in an epidemic phase, and finally its geographical expansion (
The first phase is the one preceding the arrival of the alien species in the new territory during which the pre-border biosecurity approach is put in place. This is during this preliminary phase when it is necessary to reinforce the preparedness of managers to the risk of invasion and try to identify the alien species likely to invade the territory exposed to the risk. The adoption by a large range of end-users (from customs to nurseries and forest enterprises) of technological innovations for the management of invasive species is highly dependent on the awareness of these organisms by the multiple actors involved in quarantine inspection, management of forest and forest health, plant nurseries, urban parks, garden centres, etc. The adequacy of these new tools also requires attention to the real needs of these stakeholders. This is revealed by the survey conducted among many forest health stakeholders in 15 European countries (
The second phase corresponds to the arrival of invasive species in the new territory, for example exotic pests in European forests. Here, it is necessary to detect them as early and efficiently as possible in order to quickly trigger eradication measures. Trapping methods with generic attractants have been shown to be very relevant for the detection of exotic bark beetles in high-risk areas such as ports and airports (
The third phase involves the establishment of invasive species in the new territory, a process that is intended to be interrupted by eradication measures. However, eradication is often complicated and not always accepted by the citizens. A systematic review of the literature has identified the main causes of failure and success of eradication attempts of woody plant pests in Europe, allowing also recommendations for successful implementation (
The fourth phase starts if eradication measures were not successful and therefore it is necessary to move to long-term management of established populations by limiting their expansion and damage. In particular, studies must be conducted on the climatic conditions and the quantity and vulnerability of host trees that favour the spread of diseases, as shown with the maple sooty disease (
The publications collected in this special issue demonstrate that current conceptual, methodological, and technological advances allow a great progress in the anticipation, monitoring and management of invasive pest species in forests. However, it should be noted that each of them, taken alone, is not sufficient to significantly reduce the risk of pest invasion. It is their combination, in a coherent whole, which will effectively reduce the impact of the invasive species on European forests. We therefore call on the community of researchers and practitioners to work together to develop a real strategy for monitoring and managing non-native forest pests by deploying at each stage of the invasion and in the areas at risk, the tools and methods that we contributed to improve or develop. As non-native species can arrive in different parts of Europe, can be highly mobile, borders are not impermeable, and European forests are themselves often transboundary, it is obvious that these strategies should be applied continent-wide. Mobilisation of communities beyond the forest sector and international scientific cooperation should therefore be pursued. It is also necessary to continue to harmonize national biosecurity policies and ideally to establish a European task force capable of reacting rapidly to the arrival or spread of new non-native forest pests, by not only assessing the associated risk and but also proposing actions for detection, surveillance, and control.