Elton C (1958) The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. Methuen, London, 196 pp.
NeoBiota 9: 1–11, doi: 10.3897/neobiota.9.1358
Open minded and open access: introducing NeoBiota, a new peer-reviewed journal of biological invasions
Ingolf Kühn1, Ingo Kowarik2, Johannes Kollmann3, Uwe Starfinger4, Sven Bacher5, Tim M. Blackburn6, Ramiro O. Bustamante7, Laura Celesti-Grapow8, Milan Chytrý9, Robert I. Colautti10, Franz Essl11, Llewellyn C. Foxcroft12, 13, Emili García-Berthou14, Stephan Gollasch15, José Hierro16, Ruth A. Hufbauer17, Philip E. Hulme18, Vojtěch Jarošík19, 20, Jonathan M. Jeschke21, Gerhard Karrer22, Richard N. Mack23, Jane Molofsky24, Brad R. Murray25, Wolfgang Nentwig26, Bruce Osborne27, Petr Pyšek20, 19, Wolfgang Rabitsch11, Marcel Rejmánek28, Alain Roques29, Richard Shaw30, Daniel Sol31, Mark van Kleunen32, Montserrat Vilà33, Moritz von der Lippe2, Lorne M. Wolfe34, Lyubomir Penev35
1
UFZ, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental
Research – UFZ, Dept. Community Ecology, Theodor-Lieser-Str. 4,
06120 Halle, Germany
2
Department of Ecology, Technische Universität Berlin, Rothenburgstr. 12, 12165 Berlin, Germany
3
Restoration Ecology, Technische Universität München, Emil-Ramann-Straße 6, 85354 Freising, Germany
4
Julius Kuehn Institute, Federal Research
Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for National and International
Plant Health, Messeweg 11–12, 38104 Braunschweig, Germany
5
Department of Biology, Ecology & Evolution Unit, University of Fribourg, Ch. du Musée 10, CH-1700 Fribourg, Switzerland
6
Institute of Zoology, ZSL, Regent’s Park,
London NW1 4RY, UK; and Distinguished Scientist Fellowship Program,
King Saud University, P.O. Box 2455, Riyadh 1145, Saudi Arabia
7
Department of Ecological Sciences, Institute of Ecology and Biodiversity, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile
8
Department of Environmental Biology, Sapienza University, piazzale Moro, 00185 Rome, Italy
9
Department of Botany and Zoology, Masaryk University, Kotlářská 2, 611 37 Brno, Czech Republic
10
Biology Department, Duke University, Box 90338, Durham, NC 27708, USA
11
Environment Agency Austria, Department of Biodiversity and Nature Conservation, Spittelauer Lände 5, 1090 Vienna, Austria
12
Conservation Services, South African National Parks, Private Bag X 402, Skukuza 1350, South Africa
13
DST-NRF Centre for Invasion Biology,
Department of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag
X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa
14
Institute of Aquatic Ecology, University of Girona, 17071 Girona, Catalonia, Spain
15
GoConsult, Große Brunnenstrasse 61, 22763 Hamburg, Germany
16
CONICET-Universidad Nacional de La Pampa,
Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Av. Uruguay 151, 6300 Santa
Rosa, La Pampa, Argentina
17
Department of Bioagricultural Science and
Pest Management and Graduate Degree Program in Ecology, Colorado State
University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
18
The Bio-Protection Research Centre, PO Box 84, Lincoln University, Christchurch, New Zealand
19
Department of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Viničná 7, 128 44 Prague 2, Czech Republic
20
Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, 252 43 Průhonice, Czech Republic
21
Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich,
Department of Biology II, Ecology, Grosshaderner Str. 2, 82152
Planegg-Martinsried, Germany
22
Department of Integrative Biology and
Biodiversity Research, University of Natural Resources and Life
Sciences Vienna, Gregor Mendel Str. 33, 1180 Vienna, Austri
23
School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA
24
Department of Plant Biology, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA, 05405
25
School of the Environment, University of Technology Sydney, PO Box 123, NSW 2007, Australia
26
Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, Baltzerstrasse 6, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
27
UCD School of Biology and Environmental Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
28
Department of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA
29
INRA UR 633, Zoologie Forestière, 2163 Avenue de la Pomme de Pin, 45075 Orléans, France
30
CABI Europe – UK Centre, Bakeham Lane, Egham, Surrey, TW20 9TY, England
31
CREAF (Centre for Ecological Research and
Applied Forestries), Spanish National Research Council, Autonomous
University of Barcelona, Bellaterra, Catalonia 08193, Spain
32
Estación Biológica de Doñana (EDB-CSIC), Avda. Américo Vespucio, s/n , 41092 Sevilla, Spain
33
Ecology, Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Universitätsstrasse 10, 78457 Konstanz, Germany
34
Department of Biology, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA 30460, USA
35
Pensoft Publishers, 13a Geo Milev Street, 1111 Sofia, Bulgaria
Abstract
The Editorial presents the focus, scope, policies,
and the inaugural issue of NeoBiota, a new open access peer-reviewed
journal of biological invasions. The new journal NeoBiota is a
continuation of the former NEOBIOTA publication series. The journal will
deal with all aspects of invasion biology and impose no restrictions on
manuscript size neither on use of color. NeoBiota implies an XML-based
editorial workflow and several cutting-edge innovations in publishing
and dissemination, such as semantic markup of and enhancements to
published texts, data publication, and extensive cross-linking within
the journal and to external sources.
KeywordsNeoBiota, invasion biology, alien species, semantic markup, semantic enhancements, data publishing
Introduction
Introduced species have significant biodiversity impacts
across all scales ranging from individual genes to global species
declines that are shaped by a range of evolutionary, ecological,
economic and societal mechanisms. As a consequence, biological
invasions are a major challenge for current research, policy
development and stakeholder response. International trade, transport
and travel cause an ever faster increase in alien species numbers (Hulme 2009; Pyšek et al. 2010; Chytrý et al. in press), while at the same time ‘invasion debts’ due to past socio-economic processes (Essl et al. 2011)
provide ongoing and emerging challenges. Thus, research on alien
species is a broad and innovative field of eminent importance from both
theoretical and applied perspectives (Pyšek et al. 2006; Richardson and Pyšek 2008), and not surprisingly number of peer-reviewed papers published in the last 30 years has been rising exponentially (Fig. 1).
Figure 1.
The number of papers on alien or invasive species
published per year (1980–2010) according to ISI Web of Science (accessed
1 July 2011, search string: topic=[alien plant* or alien animal* or
alien species or biological invasions or plant invasions or animal
invasions or “invasive species”]). The line indicates fitted exponential
increase (R²=0.96, p<0.0001).
Despite much success in research on invasion biology,
some scientists have claimed that this type of specialized research is
uninformative and have suggested that it be integrated into more general
ecological sub-disciplines (Marris 2009; Davis et al. 2011; Thompson and Davis 2011), which was vigorously opposed (e.g. Pyšek and Hulme 2009; Hulme et al. 2011; Simberloff et al. 2011; van Kleunen et al. 2011).
Although the search for general patterns and mechanisms in ecology
should be continued, this recommendation is oversimplified since
biological invasions have become a general phenomenon in themselves
shaping our views of evolutionary, molecular, restoration, population
and community ecology (Simberloff and Rejmánek 2011).
Of course, basic ecological patterns and processes are most likely
similar for all species independent of their origin, but depending on
the specific questions and geographic locations there are pronounced
differences between native and alien species in their life-history
traits (Crawley et al. 1996; Hovick et al. 2011), dispersion (Hulme 2008) and response to environmental drivers (Walther et al. 2009). While many alien species have negative ecological and economic impacts (Vilà et al. 2010), others may currently have no discernable effects (Williamson 1996; Kenis et al. 2009; Kowarik 2010),
and significant number of introduced species, mostly plants, have
proved beneficial in the agricultural, horticultural and forestry
sectors (Kühn and Klotz 2003; Lambdon et al. 2008).
We can also expect that introduced species will continue to have an
important role in the provision of food, fibre and fuel and contribute
positively to ‘novel ecosystems’ that fulfil certain ecological
functions in degraded habitats (Hobbs et al. 2006; Pyšek and Richardson 2010; Kowarik 2011), or in a changed climate (Walther et al. 2009).
Thus, invasion biology has many important questions and promising
areas that remain for future balanced analyses, and certainly it is a
discipline too vigorous to die (Pyšek et al. 2008; Pyšek and Hulme 2009).
We therefore are confident that the field will thrive in the future. Some of the promising current and future topics we see are:
Mechanisms underlying biological invasions:
• How propagule pressure drives establishment success in different taxa and environmental circumstances.
• The impact on the invasion process of filters acting on individuals and species prior to them reaching novel environments.
• Quantification of dispersal mechanisms and vectors of introduction and spread.
• Traits that distinguish invasive alien species from
non-invasive alien species and native species; relationship between
species traits and invasion success.
• Importance of life history trade-offs along different stages of the invasion process.
• Demographic processes and the abiotic and biotic factors shaping them between native and introduced ranges of species.
• Relative importance of founding population size vs. genetic diversity in the establishment of new populations.
• Genetics and genomics of adaptation in invasive alien species.
• Climatic niche conservatism and the biogeography of invasive species.
• Effects of other global change components on biological
invasions and interaction of invasions with such drivers, in first
place climate change.
• Assembly rules and functioning of invaded biotic
communities; mechanisms that allow alien species to coexist with native
species.
• Mutualism or facilitation during the different steps of the invasion process.
• Invasiveness of understudied groups of organisms.
Epidemiology of alien pathogens and parasites (e.g. fungi and
micro-organisms).
• Comparisons of different ‘novel organisms’, especially alien species and genetically modified organisms.
• Quantifying the strength of biotic resistance to
invasions among communities. Differences in invasibility of ecosystem
types and their causes (e.g. disturbance, fragmentation).
• Harmonizing the different approaches that have been
developed in different taxonomic groups into a common framework that
allow true cross-taxon analyses of the factors driving the different
steps of the invasion process (e.g. Blackburn et al. 2011).
Consequences of biological invasions at different scales:
• Post-invasion microevolution in native and alien species, including hybridization.
• Large-scale assessment of biodiversity changes at the gene and populations levels.
• Impacts on economy, human, plant and animal health;
facilitation of human pathogens by alien species; ecosystem impacts
("changes in" biogeochemical cycles, flammability).
• Eco-evolutionary feedback between invasive traits and ecosystem function.
• Macroecological patterns of invasions at different scales and interaction among factors shaping them.
• Context dependence of invasion success and impacts.
• Impacts on endangered species and protected areas including long-term studies.
Assessing biological invasions:
• Taxonomic impediment and the need of correct identification of species.
• Standardization of collecting and storing data and of assessing invasion impacts to allow comparability across regions.
• Modelling tools to predict spatial spread of invasive species.
• Statistical techniques to account for biases and
confounding factors; effects of data deficiency on the perception of
factors associated with invasion success.
• Interface between scientifically backed analyses and value-based assessments of invasion consequences.
• Novel ecosystems and how to define and approach them.
• Ecosystem services and disservices
• Risk-assessment tools, developed for independent purposes at different scales.
Managing biological invasions:
• Social and political aspects of biological invasions.
• Control or management of introduction vectors to avoid further species to arrive.
• Ballast water management and compliance control technologies to assess whether standards were met.
• Rapid practical implementation of advances in invasion biology for prevention, eradication, and control of alien species.
• Restoration of invaded habitats and management of novel ecosystems.
• Risk analyses, black lists and other prevention tools.
• Legal measures and their implementation.
Why ‘NeoBiota’?
While the publication of Elton’s (1958) book The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants is often considered the pioneering milestone in modern invasion ecology (Ricciardi and MacIsaac 2008; Richardson and Pyšek 2008),
the European tradition in research on biological invasions is actually
older and rooted in botanical studies from the beginning of the 19th
century (see Trepl 1990; Kowarik and Starfinger 2009).
However, European research on invasions, for example in Germany, was
fragmented until the end of the 20th century with little cooperation
between plant and animal ecologists and those working on terrestrial,
freshwater and marine ecosystems, or on the pure and applied sciences (Kowarik and Starfinger 2009).
To address this situation, a first meeting of invasion biologists was
convened in Berlin in 1999 with the aim of integrating all aspects of
invasion research, with the ultimate goal of reducing the threats to
biological diversity. From this meeting arose an informal association of
scientists, whose aims were: (i) to enhance communication and contact
among scientists working on theoretical and applied aspects of
biological invasions; (ii) to stimulate research on non-native species,
their traits, distribution, related impacts and underlying
mechanisms; (iii) to identify information deficits and co-ordinate
efforts to fill them; and (iv) to disseminate information on causes,
mechanisms and impacts of biological invasions, and on management
approaches.
The resulting group was named ‘NEOBIOTA’, coined as an
overarching term that would encompass all groups of organisms and avoid
negative associations (Kowarik and Starfinger 2009).
Terms such as ‘invasion’, ‘alien’ or ‘exotic’ were discounted as
having negative connotations, since the group was interested not just
in problematic non-native species, but also in species with neutral or
beneficial impacts. Kowarik (2002) defined „neobiota
as organisms, independent of their taxonomic rank, that occur in a
region beyond their native range due to human agency or that evolved
from such taxa”. Hence, neobiota is an umbrella term for all non-native
species without defining these by a negative or a value laden approach.
Quite quickly, NEOBIOTA developed from a German to a Central-European
and then pan-European working network with biennial conferences (see Kowarik and Starfinger 2009
for details). During the 6th NEOBIOTA conference in Copenhagen in 2010,
the participants agreed on launching an international, peer-reviewed
journal, named NeoBiota, and advocated for an open-access platform.
The new journal NeoBiota is a continuation of the former
NEOBIOTA publication series, therefore it starts with No 9. Volumes 1–8
of NEOBIOTA can be seen at: http://www.oekosys.tu-berlin.de/menue/neobiota.
Why a new journal?
In face of the eminent and increasing importance of
biological invasions there is demand for a new journal that provides
open access to a broad array of theoretical and applied invasion topics
across all taxa and ecosystems. A further significant reason to launch a
new journal is the need to respond to the major technological shift in
academic publishing practices during last decade which will ensure
important advantages for both authors and readers.
The new journal NeoBiotapublishes papers without
size limits across all disciplines dealing with biological invasions,
encompassing the ecology, evolution and biogeography of non-native
aquatic and terrestrial animals, plants, fungi and microorganisms, on
mechanisms that drive the introduction, establishment and spread of
these species, on ecological, evolutionary, economic and other
consequences of biological invasions, and on the management of
invasions in any part of the world. No bias will be attached to the
impact of non-native species, whether it is negative or positive, and
all aspects related to a particular topic will be considered. NeoBiota therefore also strongly encourages papers on ethical, social, legal and policy issues related to biological invasions. NeoBiotaconsiders
the following categories of papers for publication: (i) original
research articles, (ii) reviews as longer articles that offer a
comprehensive overview, historical analysis or future perspectives of a
topic, (iii) monographs and collections of papers on a specific topic
with no limit in size, published as ‘special issues’, (iv) short
communications, letters and discussion papers, and (v) book reviews.
The articles selected for the inaugural issue of NeoBiota
largely reflect the vision of the editors of encouraging innovative and
timely contributions to the new journal. The paper of Mack and Smith (2011),
for example, addresses the increasingly important interface between
biological invasions and human health by illustrating the role of
invasive plants for spreading human parasites. The contribution by Moravcová et al. (2011) sheds light on interactions between introduced and native species by demonstrating potential phytotoxic effects of invasive Fallopia taxa, and Kowarik and von der Lippe (2011)
disentangle, by using an experimental approach, the functioning of
secondary wind dispersal in traffic corridors from that of other
vectors. Finally, the contribution by Guo (2011) addresses, as a critical methodological challenge, how to count exotics at different spatial scales.
Why innovative and open access?
The past decade has witnessed an unprecedented revolution
in the way science is published and communicated. This revolution is
driven by the Internet as a new media and communication environment and
by open access publishing models (Suber 2010). Currently, we see the rapid move to the semantic Web (Web 2.0) and linked data environments (Berners-Lee et al. 2006), as well as an increasing strength of the open knowledge movement (see Open Knowledge/Data Definition and Panton Principles for Open Data in Science).
The ‘journals of the future’ are meant mostly as various kinds of
social networks, serving the interested community and reaching out to a
wider audience, providing barrier-free, express and concise
information, as well as access to underlying data. Content published in
the journals of the next generation will be linked to various related
sources and automatically distributed through community networks, wiki
environment, indexing and aggregation services. An important trend with
expected major impact on science communication is the ‘atomization’ of
the content, that is dissemination both at the level of individual
articles, as well as at the level of intrinsic parts of an article,
such as taxon treatments, locality records, habitat descriptions, and
others.
By having opted for open access and use of innovative
publishing and dissemination methods applied in Pensoft’s journals (see
for more detail: Penev et al. 2009, 2010a, b, 2011), we intend to make NeoBiota
a rapid means of communication with a quick editorial turnaround and
time-to-publication process, as well as an efficient system of
cross-linking of published content to external biodiversity and
bibliographic platforms.
Thus, NeoBiota will respond to the present-day cultural and technological revolution in scholarly publishing and communication through:
• Open access to all scientific content published in the
journal, with the barrier-free environment for the dissemination of
scientific results, hence increased visibility and citation
probability, that will benefit our authors and the scientific community
in general.
• Strong support and provision of infrastructure for open
data publishing, recognizing the crucial importance of up-to-date
information on how to manage biological invasions, whilst facilitating
the archiving, use and re-use of data, increasing the efficiency of
data sampling-efforts, as well as the overall transparency and quality
of the science.
• Development and implementation of various methods for
semantic mark-up of and semantic enhancements to published texts, to
ensure a pleasant and efficient reading process, as well as wide
dissemination of separate parts of an logically ‘atomised’ article’s
content.
• Publication of identical content in four different
formats to serve different target user groups: (1) full-colour,
high-resolution print version; (2) PDF for reference to the printed
version and easy archiving; (3) HTML for easy reading, browsing and
applying semantic enhancements to the text; and (4) XML to provide a
machine-readable file for archiving and data mining.
• Automated cross-linking through the Pensoft Taxon Profile with major indexing and aggregation platforms, such as the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF), Encyclopedia of Life (EOL), the International Plant Name Index (IPNI), ZooBank, the National Center for Biodiversity Information (NCBI), Genbank and Barcode of Life, the Biodiversity Heritage Library (BHL), PubMed, PubMedCentral, Mendeley and many others.
• Increased public awareness of scientific results on
biological invasions through an already established system of press
releases associated with published articles, science and general blogs,
social networks and others.
With these new techniques and novel publishing methods backing up NeoBiota,
we are confident we will contribute successfully to facilitating
research and education on invasion biology and to the swift
communication of scientific results. By joining forces with an
innovative and ambitious publisher we aim to make the science on
biological invasions more open, efficient and of great benefit to
scientists, research funders and society in general.
References
Blackburn TM, Pyšek P, Bacher S, Carlton JT,
Duncan RP, Jarošík V, Wilson JRU and Richardson DM (2011) A proposed
unified framework for biological invasions. Trends in Ecology and
Evolution 26: 333–339.
doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.03.023.
Chytrý M, Wild J, Pyšek P, Jarošík V,
Dendoncker N, Reginster I, Pino J, Maskell LC, Vilà M, Kühn I,
Spangenberg JH, Settele J (in press) Projecting trends in plant
invasions in Europe under different scenarios of future land-use change.
Global Ecology and Biogeography,
doi: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00573.x.
Crawley MJ, Harvey PH, Purvis A (1996)
Comparative ecology of the native and alien floras of the British Isles.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series
B-Biological Sciences 351: 1251-1259.
Davis M, Chew MK, Hobbs RJ, Lugo AE, Ewel JJ,
Vermeij GJ, Brown JH, Rosenzweig ML, Gardener MR, Carroll SP, Thompson
K, Pickett STA, Stromberg JC, Del Tredici P, Suding KN, Ehrenfeld JG,
Grime JP, Mascaro J, Briggs JC (2011) Don’t judge species on their
origins. Nature 474: 153-154.
Elton C (1958) The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. Methuen, London, 196 pp.
Essl F, Dullinger S, Rabitsch W, Hulme PE,
Huelber K, Jarošík V, Kleinbauer I, Krausmann F, Kühn I, Nentwig W, Vilà
M, Genovesi P, Gherardi F, Desprez-Loustau ML, Roques A, Pyšek P (2011)
Socio-economic legacy yields an invasion debt. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108:
203–207.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1011728108.
Hobbs RJ, Arico S, Aronson J, Baron JS,
Bridgewater P, Cramer VA, Epstein PR, Ewel JJ, Klink CA, Lugo AE, Norton
D, Ojima D, Richardson DM, Sanderson EW, Valladares F, Vilà M, Zamora
R, Zobel M (2006) Novel ecosystems: theoretical and management aspects
of the new ecological world order. Global Ecology and Biogeography 15:
1–7.
doi: 10.1111/j.1466-822X.2006.00212.x.
Hovick SM, Bunker DE, Peterson CJ, Carson WP
(2011) Purple loosestrife supresses plant species colonization far more
than broad-leaved cattail: experimental evidence with plant community
implications. Journal of Ecology 99: 225-234.
Hulme PE (2008) Contrasting alien and native
plant species-area relationships: the importance of spatial grain and
extent. Global Ecology and Biogeography 17: 641–647.
doi: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2008.00404.x.
Hulme PE (2009) Trade, transport and trouble:
managing invasive species pathways in an era of globalisation. Journal
of Applied Ecology 46: 10-18.
Hulme PE, Pyšek P, Duncan RP (2011) Don't be
fooled by a name: a reply to Thompson and Davis. Trends in Ecology &
Evolution 26: 318.
Kenis M, Auger-Rozenberg MA, Roques A, Timms
L, Péré C, Cock MJW, Settele J, Augustin S, Lopez-Vaamonde C (2009)
Ecological effects of invasive alien insects. Biological Invasions 11:
21-45.
Kowarik I (2002) Biologische Invasionen in Deutschland: zur Rolle nichteinheimischer Pflanzen. NeoBiota 1: 5-24.
Kowarik I (2010) Biologische Invasionen: Neophyten und Neozoen in Mitteleuropa. 2nd ed. , Ulmer, Stuttgart, 492 pp.
Kowarik I, Starfinger U (2009) Neobiota: a European approach. NeoBiota 8: 21-28.
Kowarik I, von der Lippe M (2011) Secondary
wind dispersal enhances long-distance dispersal of an invasive species
in urban road corridors. NeoBiota 9: 49–70.
doi: 10.3897/neobiota.9.1469
Kühn I, Klotz S (2003) The alien flora of
Germany - basics from a new German database. In: Child LE, Brock JH,
Brundu G, Prach K, Pyšek P, Wade PM, Williamson M (Eds). Plant
invasions: ecological threats and management solutions. Backhuys,
Leiden: 89-100.
Lambdon PW, Pyšek P, Basnou C, Hejda M,
Arianoutsou M, Essl F, Jarošík V, Pergl J, Winter M, Anastasiu P,
Andriopoulos P, Bazos I, Brundu G, Celesti-Grapow L, Chassot P,
Delipetrou P, Josefsson M, Kark S, Klotz S, Kokkoris Y, Kühn I,
Marchante H, Perglová I, Pino J, Vilà M, Zikos A, Roy D, Hulme PE (2008)
Alien flora of Europe: species diversity, temporal trends,
geographical patterns and research needs. Preslia 80: 101-149.
Moravcová L, Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Zákravský P (2011) Potential phytotoxic and shading effects of invasive
Fallopia (Polygonaceae) taxa on the germination of native dominant species. NeoBiota 9: 31–47.
doi: 10.3897/neobiota.9.1266
Penev L, Agosti D, Georgiev T, Catapano T,
Miller J, Blagoderov V, Roberts D, Smith VS, Brake I, Ryrcroft S, Scott
B, Johnson NF, Morris RA, Sautter G, Chavan V, Robertson T, Remsen D,
Stoev P, Parr C, Knapp S, Kress WJ, Thompson FC, Erwin T (2010a)
Semantic tagging of and semantic enhancements to systematics papers:
ZooKeys working examples. Zookeys 50: 1–16.
doi: 10.3897/zookeys.50.538.
Penev L, Erwin T, Miller J, Chavan V, Moritz
T, Griswold C (2009) Publication and dissemination of datasets in
taxonomy: ZooKeys working example. ZooKeys 11: 1–8.
doi: 10.3897/zookeys.11.210.
Penev L, Kress WJ, Knapp S, Li D-Z, Renner S
(2010b) Fast, linked, and open – the future of taxonomic publishing
for plants: launching the journal PhytoKeys. PhytoKeys 1: 1–14.
doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.1.642.
Penev L, Hagedorn G, Mietchen D, Georgiev T,
Stoev P, Sautter G, Agosti D, Plank A, Balke M, Hendrich L, Erwin T
(2011) Interlinking journal and wiki publications through joint
citation: Working examples from ZooKeys and Plazi on Species-ID. ZooKeys
90: 1–12.
doi: 10.3897/zookeys.90.1369.
Pyšek P, Hulme PE (2009) Invasion biology is a discipline that’s too young to die. Nature 460: 324–324.
doi: 10.1038/460324b.
Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Hulme PE, Kühn I, Wild J,
Arianoutsou M, Bacher S, Chiron F, Didžiulis V, Essl F, Genovesi P,
Gherardi F, Hejda M, Kark S, Lambdon PW, Desprez-Loustau M-L, Nentwig W,
Pergl J, Poboljšaj K, Rabitsch W, Roques A, Roy DB, Shirley S, Solarz
W, Vilá M, Winter M (2010) Disentangling the role of environmental and
human pressures on biological invasions across Europe. Proceedings of
the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107:
12157-12162.
Pyšek P, Richardson DM (2010) Invasive
species, environmental change and management, and health. Annual
Review of Environment and Resources, Vol 35: 25-55.
Pyšek P, Richardson DM, Jarošík V (2006) Who
cites who in the invasion zoo: insights from an analysis of the most
highly cited papers in invasion ecology. Preslia 78: 437-468.
Pyšek P, Richardson DM, Pergl J, Jarošík V,
Sixtová Z, Weber E (2008) Geographical and taxonomic biases in invasion
ecology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 23: 237–244.
doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.02.002.
Ricciardi A, MacIsaac HJ (2008) The book that began invasion ecology. Nature 452: 34.
Simberloff D, Alexander J, Allendorf F,
Aronson J, Antunes PM, Bacher S, Bardgett R, Bertolino S, Bishop M,
Blackburn TM, Blakeslee A, Blumenthal D, Bortolus A, Buckley R, Buckley
Y, Byers J, Callaway RM, Campbell F, Campbell K, Campbell M, Carlton JT,
Cassey P, Catford J, Celesti-Grapow L, Chapman J, Clark P, Clewell A,
Clode JC, Chang A, Chytrý M, Clout M, Cohen A, Cowan P, Cowie RH, Crall
AW, Crooks J, Deveney M, Dixon K, Dobbs FC, Duffy DC, Duncan R, Ehrlich
PR, Eldredge L, Evenhuis N, Fausch KD, Feldhaar H, Firn J, Fowler A,
Galil B, Garcia-Berthou E, Geller J, Genovesi P, Gerber E, Gherardi F,
Gollasch S, Gordon D, Graham J, Gribben P, Griffen B, Grosholz ED,
Hewitt C, Hierro JL, Hulme P, Hutchings P, Jarošík V, Johnson C, Johnson
L, Johnston EL, Jones CG, Keller R, King CM, Knols BGJ, Kollmann J,
Kompas T, Kotanen PM, Kowarik I, Kühn I, Kumschick S, Leung B, Liebhold
A, MacIsaac H, Mack R, McCullough DG, McDonald R, Merritt DM, Meyerson
L, Minchin D, Mooney HA, Morisette JT, Moyle P, Müller-Schärer H, Murray
BR, Nehring S, Nelson W, Nentwig W, Novak SJ, Occhipinti A, Ojaveer H,
Osborne B, Ostfeld RS, Parker J, Pederson J, Pergl J, Phillips ML, Pyšek
P, Rejmánek M, Ricciardi A, Ricotta C, Richardson D, Rilov G, Ritchie
E, Robertson PA, Roman J, Ruiz G, Schaefer H, Schaffelke B, Schierenbeck
KA, Schmitz DC, Schwindt E, Seeb J, Smith LD, Smith GF, Stohlgren T,
Strayer DL, Strong D, Sutherland WJ, Therriault T, Thuiller W, Torchin
M, van der Putten W, Vilà M, Von Holle B, Wallentinus I, Wardle D,
Williamson M, Wilson J, Winter M, Wolfe LM, Wright J, Wonham M, Zabin C
(2011) Non-natives: 141 scientists object. Nature 475: 36.
doi: 10.1038/475036a.
Simberloff D, Rejmánek M (2011) Encyclopedia of biological invasions. University of California Press, Berkely, CA, 765 pp.
Thompson K, Davis MA (2011) Why research on
traits of invasive plants tells us very little. Trends in Ecology &
Evolution 26: 155–156.
doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.01.007.
Trepl L (1990) Research on the anthropogenic
migration of plants and naturalization. Its history and current state of
development. In: Sukopp H, Hejný S, Kowarik I (Eds). Urban ecology.
Plants and plant communities in urban environments. SPB Academic
Publishing, The Hague: 75-97.
van Kleunen M, Dawson W, Dostál P (2011)
Research on invasive-plant traits tells us a lot. Trends in Ecology
& Evolution 26: 317.
Vilà M, Basnou C, Pyšek P, Josefsson M,
Genovesi P, Gollasch S, Nentwig W, Olenin S, Roques A, Roy D, Hulme PE,
Andriopoulos P, Arianoutsou M, Augustin S, Bacher S, Bazos I,
Bretagnolle F, Chiron F, Clergeau P, Cochard PO, Cocquempot C, Coeur
d’Acier A, David M, Delipetrou P, Desprez-Loustau ML, Didžiulis V,
Dorkeld F, Essl F, Galil BS, Gasquez J, Georghiou K, Gudžinskas Z,
Hatzofe O, Hejda M, Jarošík V, Kark S, Kokkoris I, Kühn I, Lambdon PW,
Lopez-Vaamonde C, Marcer A, Migeon A, McLoughlin M, Minchin D, Navajas
M, Panov VE, Pascal M, Pergl J, Perglová I, Pino J, Poboljšaj K,
Rabitsch W, Rasplus JY, Sauvard D, Scalera R, Sedláček O, Shirley S,
Winter M, Yannitsaros A, Yart A, Zagatti P, Zikos A (2010) How well do
we understand the impacts of alien species on ecosystem services? A
pan-European, cross-taxa assessment. Frontiers in Ecology and the
Environment 8: 135–144.
doi: 10.1890/080083.
Walther GR, Roques A, Hulme PE, Sykes MT,
Pyšek P, Kühn I, Zobel M, Bacher S, Botta-Dukát Z, Bugmann H, Czücz B,
Dauber J, Hickler T, Jarošík V, Kenis M, Klotz S, Minchin D, Moora M,
Nentwig W, Ott J, Panov VE, Reineking B, Robinet C, Semenchenko V,
Solarz W, Thuiller W, Vilà M, Vohland K & Settele J (2009) Alien
species in a warmer world: Risks and opportunities. Trends in Ecology
& Evolution 24: 686-693.
Williamson M (1996) Biological invasions. Chapman & Hall, London, 256 pp.