Research Article |
Corresponding author: Ali Serhan Tarkan ( serhantarkan@gmail.com ) Academic editor: Emili García-Berthou
© 2024 Ali Serhan Tarkan, Irmak Kurtul, J. Robert Britton.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Tarkan AS, Kurtul I, Britton JR (2024) Comparing the ecological consequences of globally invasive fishes versus their F1 hybrids in recreational fisheries. NeoBiota 95: 267-278. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.95.126656
|
Recreational angling is a major introduction pathway for non-native fish into freshwaters, where multiple non-native fishes are often released into waterbodies to diversify the angling opportunities. When these non-native fishes are taxonomically similar, then there is concern that their hybridisation will result in F1 generations comprising of novel phenotypes that outperform their parental species, resulting in the impacts of these ecological engineering species being accelerated. Across two water temperatures (18 °C, 26 °C), comparative functional response analyses (CFR) quantified the consumption patterns of the globally invasive freshwater fish common carp Cyprinus carpio and goldfish Carassius auratus, plus their F1 hybrids, before testing differences in their specific growth rates (SGRs). In CFRs, carp consumed significantly more prey at 18 °C than the other fishes, and with no differences between any of the fishes at 26 °C. SGRs also did not differ substantially between the fishes at either temperature. These results suggest that hybridisation between the high impacting parental species did not produce novel phenotypes of high ecological performance that could accelerate their ecological impacts in invaded ecosystems. Accordingly, the ecological risks of their use in recreational angling remain an issue that is primarily associated with the parent populations, and this can be reflected in their invasion management.
Common carp, comparative functional response, goldfish, heterosis
Recreational angling remains an important introduction pathway for non-native freshwater fishes, where the aims of introductions include diversification of target species and to increase angler satisfaction with their catch-related experiences (
Introductions of freshwater fishes for angling have resulted in a relatively small number of non-native fishes developing invasive populations globally, such as the North American largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides (
Where introductions of multiple non-native species are released into novel communities that are taxonomically similar, such as carp and goldfish, then this raises additional concerns over their hybridisation, as this can alter the functional traits and ecological interactions of the hybridised progeny versus their parental species (
Heterosis in the F1 generation is especially important to consider when the parental species are both high impacting non-native species of global concern, such as in carp and goldfish. Both species prefer waters of > 20 °C and are highly invasive globally with foraging behaviours that drive dietary overlaps with native fishes and strongly modify ecosystem functioning (
Comparative functional responses (CFR) and specific growth rates (SGR) can be used as proxies for ecological performance of invasive species and applied to forecasting the ecological effects of existing, emerging, and future invasive alien species (
The aim here was thus to provide the evidence base for the risk analysis of hybrids arising from the introgression of genes between taxonomically similar species using carp and goldfish as model species to experimentally test their foraging behaviours (as CFRs) and growth performance (as SGRs) versus their first-generation (F1) hybrids in contexts of two contrasting temperatures. We predict that the ecological performance of the F1 fish will be superior to both non-hybrid carp and goldfish through higher consumption rates that provide superior competitive abilities when in sympatry with their parental species which results in faster growth rates, with this heterosis being independent of temperature.
The experimental carp, goldfish and F1 hybrids were from the same hatchery in Southern England, where the fish were produced from the same parental lines, and with experimental fish exposed to the identical rearing conditions. Both parental species have thermal optima > 20 °C and critical thermal maxima > 30 °C (
For CFR experiments, individual fish were exposed to Chironomid larvae as prey resources in 10 L tanks at 18 °C following a 24-hour starvation period and a 4-hour acclimation period to their experimental tank. Food densities were 4, 8, 16, 32 and 64 larvae (and 128 for the 26 °C experiment). Food exposure was for one hour, after which the number of larvae consumed was quantified, with three replicates per prey density per species. When all replicates were completed, the fish were returned to the stock tanks. The water temperatures of both the stock and experiment tanks were then increased to 26 °C over 8 days and, following a 5-day acclimation period, the CFR experimental process was repeated. With the fish being PIT tagged, no individual fish was used more than twice in CFRs, with a minimum of five days between use (with fish used randomly across the experiments).
Values of the CFR parameters attack rate (a) and handling time (h) were calculated for each species and temperature using maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) in the Random Predator Equation (
Following completion of CFRs, all water temperatures were returned to 18 °C and the fish acclimated for 10 days in the stock tanks. The competitive growth performance of the fishes was then tested using SGRs through completion of co-habitation experiments completed in tanks of 25 L. Experimental treatments used controls (species/hybrid in allopatry; n = 6) and treatments (combinations of two species in sympatry; n = 3 + 3; and all species in sympatry; n = 2 + 2 + 2), each replicated three times. Each species per experimental treatment was batch weighed (to 0.01 g) before being released into their tanks, where they were held at 18 °C and fed a daily food ration (crushed pelletised fishmeal) at a mean of 2% starting body mass. After 15 days, the fish were removed from their tanks, re-weighed, returned to their tanks and the water temperature increased to 26 °C over five days before the experimental process was repeated. For each species/hybrid, control and treatment, and water temperature, SGR was determined from ([(lnWt+1) - lnWt) ⁄ t]/n) x 100 (Equation 1), where Wt = total starting weight of the species in the tank, Wt+1 = total finishing weight, n = number of fish, and t = number of days between Wt and Wt+1. A generalised linear model (GLM) tested the differences in SGR between treatments for each species, where SGR was the dependent variable, treatment was the independent variable, and total starting mass of fish per replicate used as an initial covariate and retained in final models when its effect was significant. Model outputs were the overall significance of the model and the mean SGR values (± 95% CI) according to species and treatment. All analyses were performed in R (version 4.2.3;
The functional responses of all species at all temperatures were Type II and significant (Fig.
Comparative functional response curves for carp, goldfish and their F1 hybrids at 18 °C (top plot) and 26 °C (bottom plot). Shaded areas around the curves represent 95% confidence intervals generated by boot-strapping. Note differences in values on both axes between the plots. The mean prey consumed was over the period of 1 hour.
First order linear coefficient results from logistic regressions for the predator and prey combinations (A). All values indicate a Type II functional response. Parameters of the comparative functional responses, with statistically significant differences in the parameters between species (α = 0.05) in bold. a = attack rate, h = handling time (B). Z and P values are statistical outputs from regression that indicate whether a and h differ significantly between the comparator species.
(A) | ||||
Temperature | Species | Linear coefficient | P | Pseudo R2 |
18 °C | F1 | -0.09 | <0.0001 | 0.63 |
Goldfish | -0.06 | <0.0001 | 0.67 | |
Carp | -0.03 | 0.0001 | 0.65 | |
26 °C | F1 | -0.06 | 0.001 | 0.69 |
Goldfish | -0.04 | <0.0001 | 0.70 | |
Carp | -0.02 | <0.0001 | 0.68 | |
(B) | ||||
18 °C | F1/Goldfish | F1/Carp | Goldfish/Carp | |
a | 12.72/7.67 | 12.72/3.43 | 7.67/3.43 | |
Z | -1.15 | 2.34 | 2.11 | |
P | 0.25 | 0.02 | 0.04 | |
h | 0.04/0.05 | 0.04/0.01 | 0.05/0.01 | |
Z | 1.10 | 8.11 | 8.77 | |
P | 0.27 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | |
Pseudo R2 | 0.63/0.67 | 0.63/0.65 | 0.67/0.65 | |
26 °C | ||||
a | 42.18/6.89 | 42.18/3.46 | 6.89/3.46 | |
Z | -8.55e7 | -19.59e7 | 3.28 | |
P | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.001 | |
h | 0.010/0.008 | 0.010/0.008 | 0.008/0.008 | |
Z | -3.39 | -12.54 | -0.19 | |
P | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.87 | |
Pseudo R2 | 0.69/0.70 | 0.69/0.68 | 0.70/0.68 |
Increased fish mass occurred in all SGR treatments at both temperatures (Fig.
There was no evidence to suggest heterosis was apparent in the performance of the F1 hybrids across both experiments, with their performance in CFRs being weak versus carp at 18 °C and differences in consumption rates not being significant at 26 °C. Their CFR metrics were significantly higher at the elevated water temperature, but this was also apparent in goldfish, with the maximum consumption rates of all of the fishes being similar at this elevated temperature. The SGR experiment also did not indicate any substantially enhanced performance in the F1 fish versus the other fishes, nor was there a strong effect of temperature on SGR, most likely due to the feed rations being maintained at a constant level across both temperatures.
Heterosis is a common outcome of hybridisation in early generations, as observed in invasive plants (
Our results, generated using hybrids and parental species under controlled conditions, represent novel outcomes as we could find no similar studies comparing the ecological performance of such high-impact invasive species versus their F1 generation. Although we concluded that F1 hybrids were not more impactful than their parental species, this should not be interpreted as an indication that they pose no management concern. On the contrary, our findings suggest that F1 hybrids are equally impactful, which implies that they should be managed with the same level of concern as the parental species. Furthermore, while only F1 hybrids were tested in this study, it is important to recognise that advanced generations of hybrids can exhibit increased similarities to the parental species, as seen in other studies (
This absence of transgressive segregation and heterosis in the hybrids of these globally invasive fishes is then important for their risk screening within management frameworks regulating the release of non-native fishes in recreational fisheries (
These results are particularly relevant in the context of climate change, which is expected to increase water temperatures globally (
It is also important to acknowledge the limitations of this study. One limitation is that only the F1 generation was examined, and the long-term ecological impacts of advanced generations of hybrids were not assessed. As other studies have shown, advanced generations of hybrids can exhibit increased similarities to parental species, potentially leading to different ecological outcomes (
Future research should focus on evaluating the performance of advanced hybrid generations under a wider range of environmental conditions, including varying temperatures and more complex ecological interactions. It would also be valuable to investigate the potential for hybrid vigour or outbreeding depression in these later generations, which could have significant implications for their ecological impact. Moreover, field studies that examine the behaviour and performance of hybrids and parental species in natural settings would help to validate and extend the findings from this controlled study.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
No ethical statement was reported.
No funding was reported.
JRB conceived the study and experimental design. AST and IK collected data. All authors analysed data, and drafted and edited the manuscript, and agree to be held accountable for the work performed therein.
Ali Serhan Tarkan https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8628-0514
Irmak Kurtul https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3566-9172
J. Robert Britton https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1853-3086
All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text or Supplementary Information.
Raw data for functional response and specific growth rate
Data type: xlsx
Explanation note: All raw data collected through experiments in the study.