Research Article |
Corresponding author: Janis Wolf ( janis.wolf@fu-berlin.de ) Academic editor: Milan Chytrý
© 2020 Janis Wolf, Dagmar Haase, Ingolf Kühn.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Wolf J, Haase D, Kühn I (2020) The functional composition of the neophytic flora changes in response to environmental conditions along a rural-urban gradient. NeoBiota 54: 23-47. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.54.38898
|
Compared to rural environments, cities are known to be extraordinarily rich in plant species. In particular, the proportion of alien plant species is higher in urban areas. This is attributed to specific urban conditions, which provide a large variety of habitats due to high geological heterogeneity. It can also be attributed to the role of cities as centres for plant introductions and the consequential increased propagule pressure. Neophytes, alien plant species introduced after the discovery of the Americas, appear to contribute especially strongly to the increased proportion of alien plants in cities. To investigate whether the plant traits of neophytes can be explained by environmental variables, we modelled the composition of their pollination types and growth forms as well as their diaspore weight and the onset of flowering in response to a selection of climatic, geological, land cover and traffic network variables with data from Germany. To test for a specific urban effect, we included their interactions with the area of urban land use.
In general, we found that climatic variables were the most important predictors for all traits. However, when considering interactions with urbanisation, non-climatic variables, which often were not significant as the main effect, remained in the final models. This points to an existing ‘urban effect’. However, it is much smaller compared to the purely climatic effects. We conclude that interferences and alterations mainly related to urbanisation and human activity in general are responsible for the different ecological processes found in cities compared to rural areas. In addition, we argue that considering functional traits is an appropriate way to identify the ecological mechanisms related to urbanisation.
Alien plants, cities, growth form, phenology, pollination, seed mass, traits, vector generalised linear model
Next to climate and land-use change, biological invasions are regarded as one of the main drivers for the recent loss of biodiversity (
The increase in urban population (
Due to their particular characteristics, cities differ from their surrounding non-urban areas by decreased mean annual air humidity and consequently drier soils (
In terms of cities also being hotspots for alien plant species, it is important to understand which plant traits benefit from, and which are disfavoured by urbanisation. Several studies have focussed on functional traits and whether they are either promoted or suppressed in cities. Their results seem to imply that plants that thrive in nutrient rich, alkaline soils as well as in warm and bright conditions are more successful in urban areas. Plants that prefer moist conditions are suppressed in cities (
The concept of the rural-urban gradient (
In this study, we aim to extend this approach and to test whether selected traits of neophytes are affected differently by environmental conditions along the rural-urban gradient. Firstly, working with traits allows to get beyond a purely taxonomic characterisation to a more functional approach (
Pollination type describes the vector a plant employed for pollen transfer. We included this trait in the analysis because the main vectors, wind and insects, are known to differ between urban and rural landscapes (
Growth form in this study is a combination of life form (
Diaspore mass is important, because large diaspores contain more resources and therefore have competitive advantages in the establishment of seedlings compared to small seeds (
Flowering phenology refers to information about timing and range of flowering events and is of great importance for pollination and reproduction. Despite genetic determination, the beginning, end and the duration of flowering can be modified, mainly by climatic conditions (Trefflich in
In this study, we test whether there is an urban effect on the proportions of traits (pollination, growth form) or the average state (diaspore mass, phenology) of neophytes in the rural-urban gradient. To this end, we explain the functional composition of grid cells of the mapping scheme of the flora of Germany by different environmental variables. In addition, we added the interactions of each variable with the area of urban land-use to detect possible urban effects in comparison with the main effects of specific environmental variables.
The data for plant species occurrence was extracted from the latest version (2013) of the floristic mapping of Germany (
Only naturalised occurrences of neophytes from 1950 onwards were considered. Data on floristic status was retrieved from BiolFlor (
Data on the four traits (pollination, growth form, diaspore mass, flowering phenology) was also retrieved from BiolFlor (
Description, abbreviation and source of the traits and response variables used in the analyses.
Trait | Description | Response var. | Abbreviation | Source |
Pollination type | Type of pollen transfer to the stigma. Either abiotic or biotic. Only the three most common types were considered and only those which were assigned as always, often or the rule for each plant in BiolFlor. | Insect pollination (entomophily) | i | Durka in |
Wind pollination (anemophily) |
w | |||
Self-pollination (autogamy) | s | |||
Multiple | m | |||
Growth form | Trait combining lifespan and life form. | Annuals | an | Krumbiegel in |
Biennials | bn | |||
Herbaceous perennial | hp | |||
Woody plants | wd | |||
Multiple | mu | |||
Diaspore mass | Mean mass of diaspore (germinal plus any dispersal-assisting tissue). | mean(log(diaspore mass)) | - | Otto in |
Flowering phenology | Mean month at which neophytes of a grid cell begin to flower. | mean(beginning month of flowering) | mean(BFM) | Trefflich in |
Data for model prediction is comprised of data on climate, geology, land cover and traffic network. A total of 19 initial environmental predictors (see Table
Environmental data and sources used for analysis of the response variables. Variables are known to be related to species richness in general and alien species richness in particular. We provide units and variable range for linear but not for quadratic predictors. In such cases, the units (and min/max values) do not make sense and the transformation was performed to account for non-linear relationships.
Variable | Description of variable | Units | Variable range (min - max) | Source |
TmpJul | Average July temperature | °C | 12.8–19.8 |
|
TmpJul2 | Squared average July temperature | |||
TmpAnnualRange | Annual temperature range, i.e. average difference between January and July temperature | °C | 21.5–29.1 | |
PrecipitationSummer | Average summer precipitation (June, July, August) | mm | 168–494 | |
PrecipitationSummer2 | Squared average summer precipitation | |||
WindSpeed | Average wind speed | m/s | 1.9–5.6 | |
#GeoPatch | Number of geological patches | 1-51 |
|
|
#GeoType | Number of geological types | 1-24 | ||
LoessArea | Area covered by loess | km² | 0–114.1 | |
SandArea | Area covered by sand | km² | 0–135.2 | |
LimestoneArea | Area covered by limestone | km² | 0–135.4 | |
#LcPatch | Number of land cover patches | 26–353 | LBM_DE2012 – |
|
#LcType | Number of land cover types | 5-22 | ||
ForestArea | Forest area | km² | 0–131.5 | |
AgriculturalArea | Agricultural area | km² | 0.5–124.7 | |
UrbanArea | Urbanised area | km² | 0–79.7 | |
RiverArea | River area | km² | 0–8.5 | |
RoadLength | Total length of roads | km | 0.2–29.2 | Open Street Map Project and MapCruzin (undated) |
RailwayLength | Total length of railways | km | 0–6.1 |
Model specification and simplification
All environmental predictors were centred to zero mean and unit standard deviation. Collinearity between the environmental predictors was assessed, but none of the pairs of predictors showed high collinearity (|Kendall's τ| > 0.7;
One problem with compositional data is that the proportions are not independent of each other: if one proportion increases, at least one of the others must decrease and vice versa. This is called the unit-sum-constraint and can be obviated by using the logarithms of ratios (log-ratios) instead of the observed proportions (
In order to detect a potential ‘urban effect’, a different model was fitted to each of these four traits (either VGLM or GLM) with all the environmental variables (except wind speed, see below) as initial predictors plus the interactions of each variable with the area of urban land cover (UrbanArea; hereafter called ‘urbanised area’). In addition, the initial models for pollination type, diaspore mass and flowering phenology also included the variable of average wind speed and its interaction with the urbanised area. The model simplification process for the generalised linear models (GLM) and vector generalised linear models (VGLM) followed the recommendations of
To test for spatial independency of the residuals, Moran's Index (the autocorrelation equivalent of Pearson’s correlation coefficient) was calculated using the R package ncf by
To account for spatial autocorrelation, a method called the ‘residuals autocovariate approach’ was applied (
During each step of model simplification (see above), new RACs for the updated model were calculated and the process was repeated until the final model was selected. This procedure ensured that the most accurate autocorrelation structure was utilised at every step. The residual autocorrelation could be reduced to a satisfying level for all final models.
To evaluate the model fits, their explained deviance D2 was calculated (
All statistical analysis was performed with the software R, version 3.4.1 (
To calculate area and length per grid cell, it was necessary to indicate the intersections of the land-cover data and traffic network systems with the lattice used for the floristic mapping. This was performed with the geographical information systems (GIS) ArcGIS 10.5 (
While trait information on pollination, growth form and flowering phenology was available for the majority of species, information on seed mass was scarcer (for details see Table
Number of neophytes per trait and trait state used for analysis. For minimum, maximum, median and/or mean values see Suppl. material
Trait | Trait state | Number of species | |
per trait state | total | ||
Pollination type | Insect pollination | 262 | 438 |
Wind pollination | 69 | ||
Self-pollination | 82 | ||
Multiple | 25 | ||
Growth form | Annuals | 157 | 492 |
Biennials | 32 | ||
Herbaceous perennial | 193 | ||
Woody plants | 74 | ||
Multiple | 36 | ||
Diaspore mass | 188 | ||
Flowering phenology | 482 |
Overview of trait states of neophytes across the 2599 grid cells of Germany A pollination type B growth form C diaspore mass (*back-transformed mean of log transformation) and D time (in months) at which neophytes begin to flower (**mean/grid cell). Bold black lines represent medians, boxes 25–75% interquartiles, whiskers samples with less than 1.5 times of the interquartile range and dots are outliers. For detailed values see Suppl. material
The explanatory power of the model was quite good, though only half of the variation explained refers to environmental information (Table
Estimates of modelling the log ratios of (A) insect pollination, (B) wind pollination, and (C) selfing over multiple pollination types. For modelling, a vector generalised linear model (VGLM) was used that included a multinomial distribution family and residual autocovariates (RAC) to account for spatial autocorrelation (SAC). D²tot – deviance of final model; D²env – deviance of environmental-only model; D²rac – deviance of residual autocovariate-only model. Bold numbers indicate significant values. Asterisks represent error probabilities: ◦ 0.1 > p ≤ .05; * .05 > p ≤ .01; ** .01 > p ≤ .001; *** p < .001. For abbreviations of predictors see Table
Predictor | (A) log(i/m) | (B) log(w/m) | (C) log(s/m) | |||
Intercept | +1.791 | *** | -0.482 | *** | +0.746 | *** |
UrbanArea | +0.027 | ° | +0.097 | *** | +0.010 | |
TmpAnnualRange | +0.038 | ° | +0.277 | *** | +0.003 | |
TmpJul | -0.245 | +1.189 | * | -0.653 | ||
TmpJul ² | +0.072 | -1.172 | * | +0.679 | ||
PrecipitationSummer | -0.021 | -1.114 | *** | +0.626 | *** | |
PrecipitationSummer ² | +0.057 | +1.116 | *** | -0.491 | *** | |
WindSpeed | -0.150 | *** | -0.128 | *** | -0.021 | |
#GeoPatch | -0.027 | * | -0.008 | -0.022 | ||
LoessArea | +0.035 | ** | +0.035 | * | +0.013 | |
SandArea | -0.048 | *** | +0.038 | ° | -0.022 | |
#LcType | -0.004 | +0.050 | * | +0.002 | ||
#LcPatch | +0.007 | -0.021 | ** | +0.055 | *** | |
AgriculturalArea | +0.062 | *** | +0.020 | -0.001 | ||
RiverArea | +0.013 | +0.085 | *** | +0.029 | * | |
UrbanArea:TmpJul | +0.044 | ** | +0.057 | ** | +0.051 | ** |
UrbanArea:WindSpeed | +0.020 | +0.067 | *** | -0.003 | ||
UrbanArea:SandArea | -0.008 | -0.051 | ** | -0.013 | ||
RAC1 | +9.565 | *** | +0.373 | -0.079 | ||
RAC2 | +0.013 | +8.942 | *** | +0.024 | ||
RAC3 | -0.254 | +0.026 | +9.626 | *** | ||
D²tot | 0.61 | |||||
D²env | 0.29 | |||||
D²rac | 0.30 |
The log-ratio of wind pollination (log[w/m]) had by far the highest number of significant predictors of all log-ratios in the model (Table
The ratio of self-pollinators was mostly related to climatic variables, and most strongly to the linear and cubic terms of summer precipitation with an optimum around the average amount of precipitation (Table
The explained deviance of growth form was comparable to that of pollination (Table
Estimates of modelling the log ratios of (A) annuals, (B) biennials, (C) perennial herbs, and (D) woody plants over multiple types. A vector generalised linear model (VGLM) was used that included a multinomial distribution family and residual autocovariates (RAC) to account for spatial autocorrelation (SAC). D²tot – deviance of final model; D²env – deviance of environmental-only model; D²rac – deviance of residual autocovariate-only model. Bold numbers indicate significant values. Asterisks represent error probabilities: ◦ 0.1 > p ≤ .05; * .05 > p ≤ .01; ** .01 > p ≤ .001; *** p < .001. For abbreviations of predictors see Table
Predictor | (A) log(an/mu) | (B) log(bn/mu) | (C) log(hp/mu) | (D) log(wd/mu) | ||||
Intercept | 0.979 | *** | -1.055 | *** | +1.443 | *** | -0.040 | ** |
UrbanArea | -0.034 | +0.083 | * | -0.053 | * | +0.038 | ||
TmpAnnualRange | -0.106 | *** | +0.058 | * | -0.071 | *** | +0.129 | *** |
TmpJul | 0.070 | *** | -0.051 | ° | -0.062 | *** | -0.068 | *** |
PrecipitationSummer | -0.651 | *** | -1.009 | *** | -0.253 | * | -1.442 | *** |
PrecipitationSummer ² | 0.546 | *** | +0.911 | *** | +0.232 | * | +0.992 | *** |
#GeoPatch | 0.018 | -0.009 | +0.010 | +0.037 | ** | |||
LoessArea | -0.015 | +0.009 | -0.001 | +0.035 | ** | |||
SandArea | 0.012 | -0.056 | ** | -0.014 | +0.016 | |||
LimestoneArea | -0.011 | -0.037 | ° | +0.004 | -0.050 | ** | ||
#LcType | -0.046 | ** | +0.063 | ** | +0.013 | +0.025 | ||
AgiculturalArea | 0.002 | -0.095 | *** | +0.010 | -0.009 | |||
RiverArea | 0.020 | * | -0.046 | ** | -0.020 | * | -0.009 | |
RoadLength | -0.035 | -0.154 | *** | -0.027 | -0.095 | *** | ||
UrbanArea:PrecipitationSummer | -0.014 | -0.003 | -0.016 | +0.042 | ** | |||
UrbanArea:#GeoPatch | -0.011 | -0.001 | -0.007 | -0.025 | * | |||
UrbanArea:LimestoneArea | 0.023 | -0.002 | +0.003 | +0.061 | ** | |||
UrbanArea:AgiculturalArea | -0.019 | * | +0.002 | -0.019 | * | -0.019 | ° | |
RAC1 | 9.646 | *** | -0.060 | -0.032 | -0.248 | |||
RAC2 | -0.165 | +8.870 | *** | -0.100 | +0.010 | |||
RAC3 | -0.120 | +0.073 | +9.439 | * | -0.440 | |||
RAC4 | 0.127 | +0.036 | +0.150 | +9.750 | *** | |||
D²tot | 0.63 | |||||||
D²env | 0.30 | |||||||
D²rac | 0.30 |
The most important positively related variable explaining the ratio of biennials was the main effect of urbanised area (Table
Except for the quadratic effect of summer precipitation, the ratio of herbaceous perennials was explained only by negatively related variables: annual temperature range, July temperature, urbanised area and river area (Table
The ratio of woody plants increased with a wider annual temperature range and decreased with increasing average July temperatures (Table
The explained deviance of diaspore mass was quite high, but almost twice as much deviance was explained by the autocorrelation structure than was by environmental factors (Table
Estimates of modelling (A) the mean log-transformed diaspore mass per grid cell and (B) untransformed beginning-month of flowering. Generalised linear models (GLM) were fitted including residual autocovariates (RAC) to account for spatial autocorrelation (SAC). D²tot – deviance of final model; D²env – deviance of environmental-only model; D²rac – deviance of residual autocovariate-only model. Bold numbers indicate significant values. Asterisks represent error probabilities: ◦ 0.1 > p ≤ .05; * .05 > p ≤ .01; ** .01 > p ≤ .001; *** p < .001. For abbreviations of predictors, see Table
Predictor | (A) Diaspore mass | (B) Onset of flowering | ||
Intercept | +0.115 | *** | +5.793 | *** |
UrbanArea | -0.046 | *** | -0.007 | |
TmpAnnualRange | -0.002 | -0.013 | *** | |
TmpJul | +0.270 | ° | +0.021 | *** |
TmpJul ² | -0.013 | ** | ||
PrecipitationSummer | -0.398 | *** | +0.123 | *** |
PrecipitationSummer ² | +0.308 | *** | -0.132 | *** |
WindSpeed | -0.214 | *** | -0.027 | *** |
#GeoPatch | -0.026 | *** | +0.003 | |
SandArea | -0.018 | *** | +0.003 | |
LoessArea | +0.031 | *** | ||
LimestoneArea | -0.018 | *** | ||
#LcType | 0.014 | *** | ||
#LcPatch | +0.028 | *** | ||
ForestArea | -0.028 | *** | ||
AgiculturalArea | +0.090 | *** | -0.032 | *** |
RiverArea | +0.017 | *** | ||
RoadLength | +0.020 | * | +0.021 | *** |
UrbanArea:TmpAnnualRange | -0.039 | *** | ||
UrbanArea:TmpJul | +0.026 | *** | +0.010 | *** |
UrbanArea:PrecipitationSummer | -0.217 | *** | ||
UrbanArea:PrecipitationSummer ² | +0.225 | *** | ||
UrbanArea:#GeoPatch | -0.009 | ** | ||
UrbanArea:SandArea | -0.009 | *** | ||
UrbanArea:LoessArea | -0.014 | ** | ||
UrbanArea:LimestoneArea | -0.029 | *** | ||
UrbanArea:ForestArea | -0.018 | *** | ||
UrbanArea:AgiculturalArea | -0.016 | *** | ||
UrbanArea:RoadLength | -0.018 | *** | ||
RAC | +9.842 | *** | +9.947 | *** |
D²tot | 0.66 | 0.51 | ||
D²env | 0.21 | 0.16 | ||
D²rac | 0.39 | 0.33 |
The explained deviance of flowering phenology was lower than for the other traits with even less explanatory power of the environmental variables (Table
We analysed trait compositions of alien plant species assemblages with respect to their pollination type, growth form, diaspore mass and flowering phenology at an intermediate spatial scale (i.e. extent is the area of Germany and c. 130 km² resolution). We tested whether their composition (for categorical traits) or mean traits values (for metric traits), respectively, are linked to the geographical variation of different environmental conditions, specifically in the rural-urban gradient. Despite the coarse resolution of our input data and rather small shifts in the composition of pollination types, growth forms, mass of diaspores and flowering phenology, the results revealed distinct responses to environmental factors (Tables
In most other studies, pollination did not differ between urban and non-urban environments (see studies reviewed in
Although the positive relationship between agricultural land use and insect pollination matches the results of
Self-pollination is associated with poor climatic conditions and unpredictable environments (
As expected, climatic variables were most important for explaining the ratio of all of the four growth forms in the model. Furthermore, we detected an urban effect on agriculture for annual and perennial herbs and urban effects of three predictors for woody plants. The annual temperature range is often used as a rough proxy for two important climate types in Europe. While a small temperature range characterises oceanic climate, a wide range indicates a continental climate (
Annuals are often associated with arable fields, as fields are disturbed relatively regularly (
As in previous studies (
Our results revealed a large ratio of perennial herbs in more urbanised areas if the proportion of agricultural area was small. In contrast, increasing agricultural area led to a much smaller share of perennial herbs in highly urbanised areas. A possible reason for this could be that the large majority of the neophytes in Germany are intentionally introduced ornamental plants (
Although we did not find that urbanised area had a significant main effect on woody neophytes, our results revealed differences in the rural-urban gradient for three variables. A potential explanation for the benefit that trees and shrubs experience from increased summer precipitation could be deduced from the trade-off between shade- and drought-tolerance. As adaptions of shade-tolerant species preclude a tolerance to drought conditions, they would benefit from moister soils caused by increased summer rainfall (
In areas with the lowest rates of urbanisation, an increasing number of geological patches (i.e. coherent areas of the same geological type) had a slightly positive effect. This is probably related to habitat heterogeneity and is in line with the findings of
While four of six studies that were examined by
Our results revealed a great number of variables that explain the mass of diaspores. As already encountered by
It is known that seed mass is positively correlated with growth form or adult longevity (
We showed that urbanised area itself is negatively related to the diaspore mass of neophytes. This matches the results of
Most interesting is that the interaction of urban land use amplifies the effect of climatic variables but dampens that of geological conditions. This is a hint towards homogenisation of geological subsoils (
Phenology – the timing of biological events – is known to be linked to climate change. Change in climate leads to change in phenology. Despite climate, changes of further environmental conditions (e.g. land use change) can also lead to shifts in timing (
However, our results denote a slight delay with higher July temperatures and even more delay in more urbanised areas with high July temperatures. It is well known that many urban neophytes tend to flower late in the year (
The earlier onset of flowering in forests and agricultural areas can be explained by the increasing dominance of trees and cultivated crops in the course of the year. Except for a few tree species and cultivated species, this especially promotes early flowering plants (i.e. before canopy cover closes or crops begin competing for light). We understand the even amplified effect in more urban areas to be a result of the urban heat island effect. Hence, city forests are relatively warmer compared to forests that are distant to cities and, therefore, they lead to an even earlier closure of the canopy and hence to an even earlier onset of flowering. The same applies for arable fields close to cities.
Lastly, there is a common pattern in most observed interactions: Urbanisation leads to later flowering, probably for the reasons discussed above (human preference for late flowering species; most neophytes are introduced for ornamental reasons –
Across all traits, precipitation and temperature were usually the most important predictors as a main effect. In most interaction terms, however, other predictors were included. The functional response of alien species is therefore reliant on climatic variables being independent from urbanisation (e.g. the urban heat island effect). This contrasts with the results of
We aimed to extend the approach of
FLORKART (http://www.floraweb.de) contains records of thousands of volunteers and is maintained by the Federal Agency for Nature Conservation (Bundesamt für Naturschutz, BfN) on behalf of the German Network for Phytodiversity (NetPhyD). We thank Laura Celesti-Grapow and another anonymous reviewer for helpful comments on the manuscript. Further, we would like to thank Owen Lyons for improving the linguistic quality of previous versions of the manuscript. Dagmar Haase’s research was carried out with support from the project ENABLE (http://projectenable.eu), funded through the 2015–2016 BiodivERsA COFUND call, nationally funded by the German Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF).
Supplementary tables
Data type: (measurement/occurrence/multimedia/etc.)
Explanation note: Table S1: List of neophyte species included in the study with information on the number of grid cells they occured, how frequently they occured in the 2599 grid cells, pollination type, growth form, diaspore mass and beginning month of flowering. Table S2: Overview on minimum, maximum, median and/or mean values across 2599 grid cells in Germany.