Review Article |
Corresponding author: Tamara B. Robinson ( trobins@sun.ac.za ) Academic editor: Tsungai Zengeya
© 2020 Tamara B. Robinson, Nicole Martin, Tainã G. Loureiro, Phikolomzi Matikinca, Mark P. Robertson.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Robinson TB, Martin N, Loureiro TG, Matikinca P, Robertson MP (2020) Double trouble: the implications of climate change for biological invasions. In: Wilson JR, Bacher S, Daehler CC, Groom QJ, Kumschick S, Lockwood JL, Robinson TB, Zengeya TA, Richardson DM. NeoBiota 62: 463-487. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.62.55729
|
The implications of climate change for biological invasions are multifaceted and vary along the invasion process. Changes in vectors and pathways are likely to manifest in changes in transport routes and destinations, together with altered transit times and traffic volume. Ultimately, changes in the nature of why, how, and where biota are transported and introduced will pose biosecurity challenges. These challenges will require increased human and institutional capacity, as well as proactive responses such as improved early detection, adaptation of present protocols and innovative legal instruments. Invasion success and spread are expected to be moderated by the physiological response of alien and native biota to environmental changes and the ensuing changes in biotic interactions. These in turn will likely affect management actions aimed at eradicating, containing, and mitigating invasions, necessitating an adaptive approach to management that is sensitive to potentially unanticipated outcomes.
biosecurity, global change, impacts, management of invasions, research needs
Human induced climate change is manifesting in a variety of environmental changes including alterations in global temperatures, precipitation patterns, ocean chemistry, currents, and frequency of extreme climatic events (
Climate change is likely to affect invasions via three mechanisms (Fig.
The effects of climate change on invasions and the mechanisms through which they act mapped onto the Blackburn Unified Framework for biological invasions (
Climate change is expected to increasingly affect the movement of people and due to the link between human movement and the introduction of alien biota, biological invasions will in turn be impacted. Notably, these changes are expected to take place as a result of changes in transport routes, destinations, altered traffic volume and changes in transit time. Presently, over 90% of the world’s trade is moved by shipping (IMO 2019). This important pathway is expected to be influenced by the melting of the Arctic ice-cap, a process that will open new shipping routes. It is estimated that 5% of the world’s trade could pass through these new routes, effectively increasing connectivity between Europe and Asia and decreasing transit times by up to 40% (
Besides direct impacts on transportation, future changes in climate are expected to alter where commodities are produced and where they are transported to. For example, salt transport in the Mediterranean Sea has revived due to decreased rainfall and increased winds raising the salinity in some regions (
As the character of vectors and pathways change, so will the processes by which biota are introduced. Patterns in unintentional introductions are likely to closely follow changes in transport as described above. These shifts in trade, culture-based industries, and tourism (
Intentional introductions are often linked to agriculture, agroforestry, horticulture, aquaculture, and fisheries (
Interestingly, crop choice may also change in an effort to reduce carbon emissions and address climate change. For example, Switchgrass Panicum virgatum has been identified as a potential carbon-negative biofuel that could be grown outside of its native range (
For the above it is clear that climate change may completely alter the global biogeography of invasions, routes, and propagule pressure as well as redefining the species targeted for translocation due to a change in human needs.
Establishment success and ensuing spread of alien species are influenced by an interplay between the abiotic and biotic nature of the recipient environment (
For an alien species to establish it needs firstly to survive and reproduce at the point of introduction, while spread requires the same outcome at the invasion front. Because physiological processes are often regulated by environmental factors such as temperature (
Presently many alien species are casual or are restricted to artificial habitats or modified urban environments (e.g. green houses, gardens, botanical gardens) (
While post-establishment spread in a poleward direction by various marine alien taxa is known to have been facilitated by ocean warming (
By altering physiological performance and population dynamics of alien and native species, changes in climate can ultimately indirectly affect invasion success through changes to alien-native species interactions (
An important aspect of climate change is the increasing frequency and intensity of extreme events such as droughts, floods, storms, and heat waves (
Besides biological invasions and climate change, other drivers of global change such as land-use change, CO2 enrichment, exploitation, and pollution have negative consequences for biodiversity and society (
Impacts can manifest at any point after introduction and are not limited to any particular stage in the invasion process. These can be biological, socio-economic, or human-health related and, in some instances, species can have impacts in more than one of these spheres (
How a changing climate might affect biological impacts of alien species can be conceptualised in terms of the relative impact potential of alien and native comparators (
Predicting how economic impacts associated with invasions might be affected by climate change is challenging, as these effects are often linked to biological processes. It has been suggested that to estimate the future economic impact of alien species, information on current impact, future potential distribution, and the likelihood of impacts remaining similar under predicted environmental conditions is required (
Impacts on human health under climate change are likely to be affected by shifting distribution and abundance of disease vectors (e.g. mosquitoes) and biota that are venomous or result in non-communicable diseases (e.g. allergenic reactions) (
Because management approaches are linked to the various invasion stages (Fig.
Key requirements for strengthening management of biological invasions in response to a changing environment.
The use of risk assessments to identify areas particularly at risk to invasion (
As the climate changes biosecurity will be confronted by changes in vectors and pathways that will require engagement with stakeholders, adaptation of present protocols, and potentially, new legislative tools (
Importantly, eradication, containment, and mitigation efforts are likely to be affected by how environmental changes affect alien species performance and the outcomes of biotic interactions with native biota (
Although management actions aim for specific outcomes, the interconnected nature of ecological systems means that targeted actions can have ecosystem level implications. For example, corridors aimed at mitigating climate change impacts on biodiversity by improving connectivity (
From the above it is clear that although numerous interactions between climate change and biological invasions have been recorded and we are able to make theoretical predictions about such outcomes in other instances, we do not have a consolidated understanding of the interplay between these drivers of global change (
Probably the greatest obstacle to our understanding of how climate change will affect biological invasions stems from a lack of foundational knowledge (
Inherent in the above gaps is a geographic bias in our understanding of biological invasions (
A pillar of good science is reproducibility. While most publications uphold high standards with regards to reporting of methods, evidence of correct species identifications (e.g. citation of species descriptions used) is seldom provided (
Variability in invasions is well recognised and poses a particular challenge to our understanding of the processes driving incursions and our ability to manage them (
Because of the transboundary nature of both invasions and climate change, it is vital to place foundational data on well-maintained open access databases. Such broad-scale datasets could be pivotal in developing a spatial understanding of climate induced impacts on native and alien biota and providing inputs in support of environmental policy (
Future climate predictions are generally made at a global spatial scale. While this approach certainly has value, it can obscure important regional trends. For example, while at a global scale the present trend of ocean warming is predicted to continue (
The accurate forecasting of invasions, their rate of spread and potential range in novel regions are key requirements for effective management of invasions (
Due to the multifaceted nature of biological invasions and the human dimension at the core of the problem, it is clear that interdisciplinarity is key to improving our understanding of the intersection between climate change and biological invasions. The emergence of invasion science out of ecology has been suggested as the reason for strong interdisciplinary interactions within the natural sciences but the need for meaningful engagement with social science is increasingly being recognised (
Unprecedented changes in climate will alter the nature of biological invasions and pose new challenges to their management. Changes in vectors and pathways will be largely directly human related and thus can be managed. However, the effectiveness of preventative measures and adaptive management will be greatly enhanced if they are proactive. For example, adaptation of importation permitting processes that anticipate import requests for new species or cultivars that may be better suited for culture under new environmental conditions will improve biosecurity outcomes in the face of climate change. In contrast to introduction and transport that are related to human actions, establishment and spread of alien biota are outcomes of ecological processes. Thus, our ability to effectively manage incursions through control, mitigation, and eradication will depend largely on our understanding of how climate change affects fitness at the species level and interactions among taxa. To this end, it is important that we address current knowledge gaps and invest in foundational understanding that will support informed management decisions into the future. Long-term monitoring of alien and native taxa offers an important tool for tracking invasions and gaining first insights into impacts. While context dependency in invasions already poses a notable challenge to their effective and efficient management (Novoa et al. in 2020), this is likely to be exacerbated by a changing climate. However, through proactive and adaptive management our ability to prevent and manage invasions under these challenging circumstances will be enhanced.
Tobias Bauer and three anonymous reviewers are acknowledged for thoughtful comments that helped to improve this paper. This paper emerged from a workshop on ‘Frameworks used in Invasion Science’ hosted by the DSI-NRF Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology in Stellenbosch, South Africa, 11–13 November 2019, that was supported by the National Research Foundation of South Africa and Stellenbosch University. This work is based on research supported in part by the National Research Foundation of South Africa (grant number: 116035). The DSI-NRF Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology is gratefully acknowledged for bursary funding for NM and TGL. The financial assistance of the National Research Foundation (NRF) for bursary support for PM is also acknowledged. Opinions expressed and conclusions arrived at, are those of the authors and should not necessarily be attributed to the NRF.