Research Article
Research Article
Rarely naturalized, but widespread and even invasive: the paradox of a popular pet terrapin expansion in Eurasia
expand article infoAndrey N. Reshetnikov, Marina G. Zibrova, Dinçer Ayaz§, Santosh Bhattarai|, Oleg V. Borodin, Amaël Borzée#, Jindřich Brejcha¤, Kerim Çiçek§, Maria Dimaki«, Igor V. Doronin», Sergey M. Drobenkov˄, Uzlipat A. Gichikhanova˅, Anastasia Y. Gladkova¦, Dmitriy A. Gordeevˀ, Yiannis Ioannidisˁ, Mikhail P. Ilyukh, Elena A. Interesova, Trupti D. Jadhav, Dmitry P. Karabanov, Viner F. Khabibullin, Tolibjon K. Khabilov, M. Monirul H. Khan, Artem A. Kidov, Alexandr S. Klimov, Denis N. Kochetkov, Vladimir G. Kolbintsev, Sergius L. Kuzmin, Konstantin Y. Lotiev, Nora E. Louppova, Vladimir D. Lvov, Sergey M. Lyapkov, Igor M. Martynenko, Irina V. Maslova, Rafaqat Masroor‡‡, Liudmila F. Mazanaeva˅, Dmitriy A. Milko§§, Konstantin D. Milto», Omid Mozaffari||, Truong Q. Nguyen¶¶, Ruslan V. Novitsky˄, Andrey B. Petrovskiy, Vladimir A. Prelovskiy##, Valentin V. Serbin¤¤, Hai-tao Shi««, Nikolay V. Skalon»», Richard P. J. H. Struijk˄˄, Mari Taniguchi˅˅, David Tarkhnishvili¦¦, Vladimir F. Tsurkanˀˀ, Oleg Y. Tyutenkov, Mikhail V. Ushakov, Dmitriy A. Vekhov, Fanrong Xiao««, Andrey V. Yakimov, Tatyana I. Yakovleva, Peimin Yangˁˁ, Dmitriy F. Zeleev, Varos G. Petrosyan
‡ Unaffiliated, Moscow, Russia
§ Ege University, Izmir, Turkiye
| Nepal Conservation and Research Center, Sauraha, Nepal
¶ Unaffiliated, Ulyanovsk, Russia
# Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China
¤ Charles University in Prague, Praha, Czech Republic
« Goulandris Natural History Museum, Kifissia, Greece
» Unaffiliated, St. Petersburg, Russia
˄ Science-Practical Center of the National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Belarus for Bioresources, Minsk, Belarus
˅ Unaffiliated, Makhachkala, Russia
¦ Unaffiliated, Borisovka, Russia
ˀ Unaffiliated, Volgograd, Russia
ˁ Ecostudies PC, Athens, Greece
₵ Unaffiliated, Stavropol, Russia
ℓ Unaffiliated, Tomsk, Russia
₰ Department of Zoology, Dhempe College of Arts and Science, Miramar, India
₱ Unaffiliated, Borok, Russia
₳ Unaffiliated, Ufa, Russia
₴ Institute of Natural Sciences of Khujand State University, Khujand, Tajikistan
₣ Jahangirnagar University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
₮ Unaffiliated, Voronezh, Russia
₦ Unaffiliated, Arkhara, Russia
₭ Aksu-Zhabagly Nature Reserve, Zhabagly, Kazakhstan
₲ Unaffiliated, Sochi, Russia
‽ Unaffiliated, Nalchik, Russia
₩ Unaffiliated, Rostov-on-Don, Russia
₸ Unaffiliated, Vladivostok, Russia
‡‡ Zoological Sciences Division, Pakistan Museum of Natural History, Islamabad, Pakistan
§§ Institute of Biology National Academy of Sciences, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan
|| Aria Herpetological Institute, Tehran, Iran
¶¶ Graduate University of Science and Technology, Hanoi, Vietnam
## Unaffiliated, Irkutsk, Russia
¤¤ Unaffiliated, Taman, Russia
«« Hainan Normal University, Hainan, China
»» Unaffiliated, Kemerovo, Russia
˄˄ Reptile, Amphibian and Fish Conservation Netherlands (RAVON), Nijmegen, Netherlands
˅˅ Nature Recovery Co., Ltd., Kobe, Japan
¦¦ Ilia State University, Tbilisi, Georgia
ˀˀ Institut of Zoology, Chişinău, Moldova
ˁˁ Liaoning Key Laboratory for Prevention and Treatment of Aquatic Animal Diseases, Freshwater Fisheries Research Academy of Liaoning Province, Liaoyang, China
Open Access


The North American terrapin, the red-eared slider, has globally recognized invasive status. We built a new extensive database using our own original and literature data on the ecology of this reptile, representing information on 1477 water bodies throughout Eurasia over the last 50 years. The analysis reveals regions of earliest introductions and long-term spatio-temporal dynamics of the expansion covering now 68 Eurasian countries, including eight countries reported here for the first time. We established also long-term trends in terms of numbers of terrapins per aquatic site, habitat occupation, and reproduction success. Our investigation has revealed differences in the ecology of the red-eared slider in different parts of Eurasia. The most prominent expression of diverse signs of invasion success (higher portion of inhabited natural water bodies, higher number of individuals per water body, successful overwintering, occurrence of juvenile individuals, successful reproduction, and establishment of populations) are typical for Europe, West Asia and East Asia and tend to be restricted to coastal regions and islands. Reproduction records coincide well with the predicted potential range based on climatic requirements but records of successful wintering have a wider distribution. This invader provides an excellent and possibly unique (among animals) example of wide alien distribution, without the establishment of reproducing populations, but through the recruitment of new individuals to rising pseudopopulations due to additional releases. Therefore, alongside the potential reproduction range, a cost-effective strategy for population control must take in account the geographical area of successful wintering.

Graphical abstract


Alien species, biological invasions, global change, invasion ecology, nature conservation, wintering


The growth of the global human population and the development of international transport networks has resulted in mass translocations of biological species outside of their native ranges, that have led to the homogenization of the Earth’s biota within potential ecological niches (McKinney and Lockwood 1999; Seebens et al. 2020). Intentional and unintentional biological invasions represent considerable issues for native biodiversity, economic activities and even human health (Gilpin 1990; Vitousek et al. 1996; Mazza et al. 2014).

The invasion of alien amphibians and reptiles has significantly accelerated since the middle of 20th century (Kraus 2009; Capinha et al. 2017). Alongside the brahminy blindsnake Indotyphlops braminus and common house gecko Hemidactylus frenatus, the pond slider Trachemys scripta (Schoepff, 1792) is one of the three most widespread alien reptiles globally (Capinha et al. 2017). The native range of the pond slider Trachemys scripta is restricted to central, southern and southeastern United States and the adjacent portion of Mexico (Rhodin et al. 2017). This species of terrapin consists of at least three subspecies. Subspecies T. s. scripta (yellow-bellied slider) and T. s. troostii (Cumberland slider) are kept and bred in captivity substantially less often compared with T. s. elegans (red-eared slider). The last taxon became very popular as a pet animal, sometimes also an ornamental pond animal, and has been one of the most-traded reptiles since the middle of the 20th century. Export from the United States to other countries reached millions of individuals per year (Telecky 2001; Reed and Gibbons 2003). Since the end of 20th century, large-scale commercial breeding of T. s. elegans also started in China and countries of Southeast Asia where it is used for human consumption (van Dijk et al. 2000). These active and mobile reptiles often escape captivity.

Young red-eared slider individuals are small and brightly colored, making them very attractive for aquarists. However, these animals grow rapidly, and large individuals require more space, are less visually appealing, aggressive and may bite. Releasing them into the nearest water body is a common way to get rid of an annoying pet. This terrapin easily adapts to outdoor conditions and can reproduce and establish stable populations in regions with an appropriate climate (Rödder et al. 2009; Heidy Kikillus et al. 2010). Once established, the slider may induce a negative impact on native macrophytes and hydrobionts (Ficetola et al. 2012). Amphibians are regarded to be especially vulnerable because this terrapin feeds on tadpoles, and the presence of chemical cues released by this predator can affect the development rate and size at metamorphosis of tadpoles (Polo-Cavia et al. 2010; Vodrážková et al. 2020). The red-eared slider is more aggressive and has higher reproductive characteristics and, hence, may successfully compete with native terrapin species for food, basking sites and, possibly, egg-laying places (Cadi and Joly 2003; Perez-Santigosa et al. 2008; Pérez-Santigosa et al. 2011; Polo-Cavia et al. 2011; Pearson et al. 2015). Experimental studies have confirmed a higher mortality of native European pond terrapin in the presence of the invasive red-eared slider (Cadi and Joly 2004). In addition, this alien terrapin can induce the genetic pollution of populations of native terrapins due to introgression (Parham et al. 2013) and is involved in the life cycles of native parasite species, while also acting as a vector for the invasion of alien parasites, which are capable of infecting native terrapins and increase the risk of epizootics, causing mass mortalities (Iglesias et al. 2015; Demkowska-Kutrzepa et al. 2018). Moreover, this alien reptile can carry the agents of salmonellosis, which is dangerous for human health (Nagano et al. 2006; Shen et al. 2011). For these reasons, the trade of small-sized (<10 cm) individuals of red-eared slider was banned in the 1970s in the United States and import of this reptile to Europe has been entirely banned since 1997 (Ficetola et al. 2012).

Despite biosecurity efforts in some countries, today the pond slider (mainly red-eared slider) occurs in outdoor water bodies on all continents except Antarctica (Ramsay et al. 2007; Ficetola et al. 2012; Rhodin et al. 2017). The invasive ranges of the pond slider T. scripta and its subspecies T. s. elegans in some regions of Eurasia were recently reflected in several scientific reviews (Sillero et al. 2014; Rhodin et al. 2017). However, regions of Eurasia significantly differ in volumes of primary data. The best studied region is West Europe (Sillero et al. 2014) whereas huge areas of North Asia, South Asia, and Middle and Central Asia (marked below as Central Asia) are commonly depicted as a blank spot, reflecting the absence of appropriate studies (Rödder et al. 2009; Heidy Kikillus et al. 2010; Ma and Shi 2017; Rhodin et al. 2017). Detecting the alien terrapins is easy in park ponds during warm seasons but may be a difficult task when direct spotting is limited by seasonality, weather (especially in northern regions), large water body size, macrophyte densities, and landscape features. In those cases, indirect express methods of detection, such as detection dogs, e-DNA or parasitological analysis of co-inhabiting hydrobionts, may be applied (O’Keeffe 2009; Kakuda et al. 2019; Reshetnikov and Sokolov 2020).

Modelling of potential ranges of species is a popular direction of contemporary ecology; analyses have been performed for the red-eared slider, mainly at the species level using available datasets and on different geographic scales (e.g., Ficetola et al. 2009; Rödder et al. 2009; Heidy Kikillus et al. 2010; Masin et al. 2014; Banha et al. 2017). However, physiological differences of subspecies are debatable and individuals of other subspecies are less common in regions outside their native distribution. Importantly, additional primary data from extensive, previously unstudied, regions can alter knowledge about its niche and, hence, its potential distribution.

Different definitions of the term “invasive species” have been proposed based on ecological and/or practical approaches (e.g., Jeschke and Strayer 2005; Beck et al. 2008; Blackburn et al. 2011). We suggest that the main features of an invasive alien taxon are establishment of self-sustaining populations and their significant effect on native ecosystems. Due to assumed negative influences on freshwater ecosystems, the widely spread subspecies T. s. elegans, is regarded as an invasive taxon in Europe and North Asia (European Commission 2016; Reshetnikov et al. 2018). However, despite the large volume of scientific publications on this animal, to date, data on negative impact of the red-eared slider upon native species are scarce in most regions of Eurasia (but see: Cadi et al. 2004; Perez-Santigosa et al. 2008) and geographic limits of its invasive populations are still debatable because confirmation of its successful reproduction is a complex task (Cadi and Joly 2004). We hypothesized that the invasion ecology, including establishment of populations, of this reptile in different colonized areas may differ and thus the invasive status of red-eared slider needs to be reviewed. A distinguishing feature of our investigation is the use of an integrated comprehensive database, with primary data collected by professional herpetologists from previously non-studied regions. Here, we aimed to analyze the invasion ecology of this alien reptile in different parts of Eurasia, establishing foundations for the verification of its invasive status and for an update of current biosecurity approaches.

Materials and methods

Data collection

For assessing the current distribution, the verified original records of the red-eared slider from 236 geographic localities were collected by the authors of this paper during their field inspections of water bodies in different regions of Eurasia in 2002–2020. Additionally, 1241 relevant records from 1968–2020 were obtained from scientific papers (Suppl. material 1), however 99.4% of these literature records are from 1990 and later, and 96.1% are from 2000 and later. All original data were subjected to rigorous verification. In doubtful cases, i.e., without georeferenced location or exact identification of terrapins by authors of observations, we requested and analyzed the coordinates of the localities, and photos with details of head and neck coloration for correct identification. The identity of 167 inconclusive cases (not included in the above-mentioned numbers) was not confirmed and they were therefore not included in the analysis. We also used two datasets (for Europe and Asia) from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF; with records from 1978–2020. Assuming red-eared slider is an invasive taxon with described remarkable impact on native species (Cadi et al. 2004; Perez-Santigosa et al. 2008), and keeping in mind the absence of data on its impacts for the majority of the georeferenced records, we analyzed all above-mentioned data regardless of impact. The data were structured into categories depending on the source of data (original/literature/GBIF) and identification level (species/subspecies). We did not include in the analysis the available data on the presence of red-eared sliders in open water bodies on territories of zoological parks (e.g., Rupperswil, Klagenfurt, Belgrade, Sofia, Odessa, Moscow, Rostov-on-Don, Barnaul, Singapore, Izmir, Istanbul, Mersin, Antalya) because of likely management and care by staff (i.e., artificial wintering of adult terrapins, special conditions for egg incubation), but we used data from other urban parks. The original and literature records of the red-eared slider were distributed as follows: 713 in Europe, 589 in East Asia, 21 in North Asia, 61 in West Asia, 4 in Central Asia, 50 in South Asia, 39 in Southeast Asia (see Suppl. material 2 for delineation of the continent). The database of original and literature records is available in Suppl. material 3. The data from GBIF represented 5967 records from Europe and 31 records from Asia. Altogether, 1477 original/literature records and 5998 records from GBIF of T. s. elegans were included in the analysis (Fig. 1a).

Figure 1.

The geographical distribution of the red-eared slider Trachemys scripta elegans in Eurasia. a sources of data: 1 (red squares) – records from literature sources (see Suppl. material 1); 2 (red circles) – original records; 3 (blue circles) – records from (12 September 2020) GBIF Occurrence Download; The layers are located from 1 (above) to 3 (below) b spatio-temporal dynamics of records: 1 (black circles) – records of 1968–1989; 2 (green circles) – records of 1990–1999; 3 (blue circles) – records of 2000–2009; 4 (red circles) – records of 2010–2020. The layers are located from 1 (above) to 4 (below); c the ecology: 1 (red circles with dot) – records of established populations; 2 (red circles) – confirmed successful reproduction; 3 (red triangles) – unsuccessful reproduction attempts; 4 (blue circles) – confirmed successful overwintering; 5 (green circles) – records without information on ecology. The layers are located from 1 (above) to 5 (below).


We used earlier suggested terms (Reshetnikov 2013) for discussion of the invasion process: a. initial introduction; b. center (source) of the secondary distribution, i.e., the region invaded by the alien species around the point of initial introduction serving as a source for further expansion; c. invaded subrange, i.e., part of the invaded range assumed to have originated from a single or a limited number of initial introductions, geographically separated from other invaded subranges, which may be temporally separated and later merged. Commonly, these processes are identified through the spatio-temporal analysis of records but additional tools, such as molecular-genetic methods, are also important.

Habitats, number of terrapins per water body, body sizes and ecology

We used all available georeferenced data (1968–2020) to understand the invasion ecology of this reptile in regions of Eurasia. Some original and literature records indicated habitat characteristics (N=1219), number of sliders per water body (N=963), measure of slider sizes (carapace length, CL, with accuracy ± 1cm) and/or distant assessing of sizes (with an interval of 5cm) (N=570), and information on ecology (N=270). The proportion of records with appropriate data are presented for each part of Eurasia separately in Table 1.

Table 1.

Proportion of records (%) with appropriate data for each part of Eurasia.

Europe E Asia N Asia W Asia S Asia SE Asia C Asia
Habitats 82.3 89.8 100 83.6 24.0 38.5 100
Numbers 75.3 54.5 95.2 93.4 22.0 33.3 100
Sizes 33.1 40.7 85.7 78.7 26.0 35.9 25
Ecology 26.2 6.1 4.8 50.8 6.0 28.2 100

We used data on latitude, longitude, date, habitat characteristics, number of individuals per water body, body sizes, and ecology to build correlation matrixes. Some parameters (habitat characteristics, body sizes, and ecology) were ranked as presented in Suppl. material 4. To assess the degree of synanthropy we used the above-mentioned data on habitats as continuing transition from habitats outside human settlements (lowest synanthropy) to recreational parks (highest synanthropization). When calculating relationships with sizes, we ignored scores “6” and “7” (“adults”, “all sizes”) as well as cases with several different sizes in the same water body. To build a histogram with body sizes, we included cases with several different sizes in the same water body (e.g., 1, 3 or 2, 3, 4); they were counted as separate cases of observations. Therefore, contrary to correlation analysis, the histogram with size classes represents analysis of cases of observations but not of water bodies. For assessment of the degree of reproduction success, we used data on ecology (see Suppl. material 4) after excluding score “1” (“casual records”). Therefore, the reproduction scale represents a continuum from just successful overwintering to established populations.

Species distribution models

We aimed to build two species distribution models (SDM) for red-eared slider: (a) the potential range of successful reproduction as an assessment of the probable area of population establishment (SDM1); (b) the potential range of successful overwintering as a probable area of long-term survival of released individuals (SDM2). The models were built using four sequential steps: (i) preparation of vector and raster layers; (ii) thinning of environmental variables and georeferenced records; (iii) selection of background areas for MaxEnt models; (iv) determination of MaxEnt model parameters; (v) building SDMs using MaxEnt.

  1. Preparation of vector and raster layers. Vector layers of occurrence records were created in ArcGis 10.6.1 (Environmental Systems Research Institute 2020) using the full number of available records (9204 records: 1729 in the native and 7475 in Eurasian invasive parts of the slider range). Bioclimatic variables (all 19) were obtained from the WorldClim 2.1 dataset (Hijmans et al. 2005). In addition to this dataset, we also analyzed 16 predictor variables from the ENVIREM dataset (Title and Bemmels 2018), many of which are related to the ecology of the terrapin under study. Thus, we created raster layers for 35 environmental variables at a spatial resolution of 2.5 arc minutes (~5 km 2) for further analysis. This stage was common for both (SDM1 and SDM2) models.
  2. Thinning of environmental variables and georeferenced records. We tested for mulicollinearity amongst the potential predictor variables using two methods: the Pearson correlation coefficient, with a threshold value of > 0.75; and the variation inflation factor (VIF), with a threshold value of > 10 (Hair et al. 1995). The corSelect function in the fuzzySim package (Barbosa 2015) was used for these analyses. Based on these results, and the ecological requirements of the red-eared slider, we selected four predictor variables that were used in the SDMs. The selected four variables, their descriptions and links to slider ecology are as follows:
  • BIO10 (defined as the mean temperature of the warmest quarter). This variable represents the availability of thermal energy, particularly for feeding activity, and was included because the northern distribution of red-eared sliders may be limited by low summer temperatures. This species requires water temperatures higher than 10 °C for the activation of feeding behavior, while the optimal soil temperature for embryonic development of eggs is 26–32 °C (Parmenter 1980).
  • growingDegDays0 (defined as the sum of mean monthly temperature for months with mean temperature greater than 0 °C, multiplied by the number of days in that month). This variable reflects the duration of the ice-covered period, i.e., time without access to air oxygen. Red-eared sliders are assumed to have limited ability for long-term survival under anoxic conditions (Ultsch 2006).
  • BIO18 (defined as levels of precipitation during the warmest quarter). This variable may be important for humidity-dependent embryonic development of skin-shelled eggs of red-eared sliders (Tucker et al. 1998).
  • climaticMoistureIndex (defined as a metric of relative wetness and aridity). This variable is related to water availability and hence is a key factor for the stability of aquatic habitats (shallow water bodies), which may shrink during summer.

In our case, the maximum Pearson coefficient was PC=0.742 between the variables BIO10 and growingdegdays0, and the maximum VIF=6.8 for the variable BIO10.

We used a two-step procedure to identify and reduce the spatial autocorrelation of georeferenced records. We used the spThin package in R (Aiello-Lammens et al. 2015) to subsample the data ten times, using ten thinning parameters – the records were separated by distances of 10–100 km in intervals of 10 km. Then the ten datasets were subjected to a cluster analysis using the average nearest neighbor index (ANNI) in ArcGis 10.6.1 (Environmental Systems Research Institute 2020). After this analysis, we chose the set of georeferenced records for which ANNI=1. As a result of this approach, we obtained a reduced dataset which was used for preparation of two datasets (DS1, DS2) for creating two bioclimatic models (SDM1, SDM2) accordingly (Suppl. material 6): the potential range of successful reproduction as an assessment of the probable area of population establishment (SDM1); the potential range of successful overwintering as a probable area of long-term survival of released individuals (SDM2). The first model was built based on georeferenced records (DS1) from the native range of the species in North America, taken from the International database GBIF (n=373 from (29 July 2020) GBIF Occurrence Download; we verified this dataset by comparing with the native range of T. s. elegans reported in Rhodin et al. 2017) and Eurasian original and literature records of successful reproduction and established populations (n=98). The second model, i.e., wintering range, was based on DS2 which included the above-mentioned datasets, with the addition of records of confirmed successful overwintering within Eurasia (n=124).

  1. Selection of background areas for MaxEnt models. We used the conventional choice of background localities from the presence region, here defined as the convex polygon, to build the two models (Rodda et al. 2011). However, the conventional choice of background localities in convex polygon may have some limitations as this minimizes the contrast between presence and absence, so we employed the recommendations presented in previous literature (Lobo et al. 2008; Lobo et al. 2010). These studies suggest selecting backgrounds from areas that are immediately adjacent to occupied habitats but are known to be unoccupied. For this reason, we combined convex polygons located in North America, southern Europe, East Asia, and Southeast Asia, which included appropriate georeferenced records. Background areas for the two models are presented in Suppl. material 6.
  2. Determination of MaxEnt model parameters. Although the SDMs built with MaxEnt (MaxEnt.jar; Dismo) (Phillips and Dudík 2008; Hijmans et al. 2017) using default parameters were based on extensive empirical material, some studies have shown that they can be inefficient (e.g., Muscarella et al. 2014). For this reason, we determined the optimal MaxEnt model parameters for each type of model using the AICc information criterion in the ENMeval R package (Muscarella et al. 2014). ENMeval applies three threshold-independent evaluation metrics: AUC Test, AUC Diff, and the size-corrected Akaike information criterion (AICc). AUC Test is a metric that measures the discriminative ability of an SDM using georeferenced records that were not used when the model was built. AUC Diff is the difference between the AUC calculated from the AUC Train training sample and AUC Test. This metric (AUC Diff) is a measure of model overtraining. AICc, adjusted for small sample size, reflects the degree of fit and complexity (Muscarella et al. 2014; Guisan et al. 2017; Title and Bemmels 2018). The ENMeval package creates a number of MaxEnt models for each dataset using different regularization multiplier (RM) values and feature classes (FC), compares them using the AICc criterion and chooses the most appropriate model. This package typically selects a model that is less complex than the default model adopted by MaxEnt, with acceptable AUC Train and AUC Diff metrics (Halvorsen et al. 2016; Title and Bemmels 2018). Although we did not find any general trends in the selection of FC, the FCs selected using the AICc models had higher RM values than the default value of 1.0 (Suppl. material 7). As a result, the following parameters were chosen for SDM1: feature classes (L = linear, Q = quadratic), and RM=4.0. For SDM2- feature classes (L = linear, Q = quadratic, H = hinge, P =product and T = threshold), and RM=4.0 (see Suppl. material 7)
  3. Building SDMs using MaxEnt. Species distribution models were built using the maximum entropy method by MaxEnt 3.4.1 with optimal MaxEnt parameters (Hijmans et al. 2017). When training the models, we used occurrence records and background areas as presented in Suppl. material 6. We used a ‘sre’ strategy for the random generation of the background (pseudo-absence) (PA) points using the Biomod v.2.0 R package. The number of PA points generated (as recommended by Barbet-Massin et al. 2012) was according to the number (N) of georeferenced records (if N ≤ 1000 then 1000 points were selected, otherwise 10,000 points were selected). At the next stage, we projected the MaxEnt models with optimal parameters onto the territory of Eurasia. Final versions of these models were built as a result of 10 MaxEnt runs to randomly select test and training georeferenced records. In all MaxEnt runs, 80% of the records were used as training samples while 20% served as test samples. We used the Boyce index (Bind) to assess model performance (Boyce et al. 2002; Di Cola et al. 2017), with the help of the EcoSpat R package (Di Cola et al. 2017). The Boyce index lacks the drawbacks present in the AUC index (Lobo et al. 2008; Guisan et al. 2017; Petrosyan et al. 2020).

Analysis of niches

To analyze the features of environmental factors favorable for successful reproduction of the studied terrapin, a comparative analysis of the centroids (mean positions of species localities in relation to environmental factors) of niches for several predictor variables in three parts of the range (Europe, West Asia, and East Asia) was carried out. These parts of the range were selected because of sufficient records of four ecological characteristics: confirmed successful overwintering, unsuccessful reproduction attempts, confirmed successful reproduction, and established populations. Comparative analysis was performed using GLM ANOVA (see section Statistics) based on raw values of ecologically important predictor variables (BIO10, BIO18, growingDegDays0, climaticMoistureIndex the same as used for the SDMs – see the methodology above).


Normalized histograms were used for visualization of data on invasion ecology; means and standard errors are shown in the text as descriptive statistics. Spearman R rank correlation coefficient was applied for assessing possible relationships between measures of invasion ecology, date, and latitude and longitude. Statistical hypotheses were tested at 0.05 p-level. Multiple comparisons of the proportion of key habitat use by the red-eared slider in the three parts of the invaded range (Europe, West Asia, East Asia) for which there were enough data for appropriate statistical analysis was performed using the chi-square statistical test and then the Tukey Post hoc test (Zar 2010). In addition, we also used the Shannon’s index to assess body size diversity in these parts of the range. A comparative analysis of Shannon’s indices for size diversity was made using the test proposed by Hutcheson (Magurran 1988).

Comparative analysis of niche centroids was made using the Generalized Linear Model (GLM) procedure. In this model, one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used with equal and unequal numbers of replicates in the cells. In all cases, type I analysis of variance models was used, i.e., fixed factor models. In the first ANOVA model we used the factor “geographic region” and compared species niche centroids (means of predictor variables) in different geographic regions (Europe, West Asia, and East Asia), i.e. we used one-way ANOVA with three levels of region factors. For the second group of the models, the factor “establishment success” was used, consisting of four levels of reproductive/establishment status (see above). This analysis is important to identify the range of environmental parameters favorable for successful reproduction. If an analysis of variance with fixed effects showed a significant difference in the level of factors, a test of multiple comparison, the Post hoc Tukey HSD was used to determine which levels of the factor differed from each other. For multiple comparisons with unequal variances according to Leuven’s test, the Tukey-Cramer test with Welch’s modification was used (Zar 2010). Prior to the analysis, all data were Log-transformed to achieve normal distribution of the GLM ANOVA residuals. This additional analysis is important because it allows us to test the validity of GLM ANOVA results using non-transformed data with residuals that differ from the normal distribution, as recommended in the literature (Zar 2010).

Statistical analysis was performed using basic and special packages in the R language in RStudio Version 1.2.5033 (RStudio Team 2020). We used MaxEnt.jar and a set of R packages spThin (Aiello-Lammens et al. 2015), ENMeval (Muscarella et al. 2014), EcoSpat (Di Cola et al. 2017), Biomod2 (Thuiller et al. 2021), Raster (Hijmans et al. 2022), Dismo (Hijmans et al. 2017), fuzzySim (Barbosa 2015) in RStudio Version 1.2.5033 (RStudio Team 2020) to build SDM models. In addition, we also used ArcGis 10.6.1 (Environmental Systems Research Institute 2020) to prepare raster layers of predictor variables, analyze the average nearest neighbor index, and visualize SDMs.


Spatio-temporal dynamics and current occurrence range in Eurasia

Records from 1968–1989 fall into countries in Europe, West Asia, and East Asia. The earliest records were reported from the Czech Republic from 1968, southern Japanese islands from 1972, Israel from 1975, the Netherlands from 1980, and Belgium from 1982. Records from 1990–1999 occurred in more regions of Europe, West Asia, East Asia and expanded to Southeast Asia (the Czech Republic, Spain, Italy, Sweden, England, Romania, Germany, Belgium, the Netherlands, Poland, Israel, Japan, Thailand, Vietnam, Republic of Korea and the Taiwan Island). By 2010 this reptile was already known in all parts of Eurasia, except Central Asia and North Asia, but today it occurs in all parts of Eurasia. Spatio-temporal dynamics of records are shown in Fig. 1b.


In the most studied parts of the continent, i.e., Europe and East Asia, the proportion of records in parks and other urban environments reaches 83.8 and 82.6% respectively (Fig. 2a). In West Asia, with 51 appropriate observations, records in human settlements reach 86.3% (Fig. 2a). In Europe, synanthropy of the red-eared slider is more typical for eastern regions (see Suppl. material 5). Despite the general assessment that synanthropy did not correlate to latitude (see Suppl. material 5), records of the terrapin outside urban territories and rural settlements (score 1) highlighted a negative correlation with latitude values in Europe (R = –0.10; t(n–2) = –2.41; N = 587; p<0.05) and a positive correlation with reproduction success (R = 0.20; t(n-2) = 2.36; N = 135; p<0.05). In Europe, more synanthropic groups of terrapins are more abundant (higher number of individuals per water body), and portion of registered synanthropic groups has increased over the years. In East Asia, synanthropy is less common in southern regions and, similarly to Europe, has increased over the years. In West Asia, more synanthropic groups are more abundant (see Suppl. material 5).

Figure 2.

Ecological characteristics (left axis, %) and numbers of observations (at the tops of columns) of the red-eared slider Trachemys scripta elegans in different parts of Eurasia. a habitats: sites outside human settlements (“nature”); urban sites outside recreational zones (“urban sites”); public parks b number of individuals per water body (n) c body sizes (cm) d ecology: wintering; unsuccessful reproductive attempts; successful reproduction; establishment of populations. Colors are explained in the legends.

Distribution of red-eared sliders among the three types of habitats does not differ between the European and East Asian parts of the range, but habitat distribution in both regions significantly differe from habitat distribution in West Asia (Fig. 3). Remarkably, in all parts of the studied range, the proportion of records in the second habitat, i.e., records located in water bodies within human settlements but outside recreational areas, is significantly greater than that of habitats 1 and 3, sites outside human settlements and public parks (Fig. 3). In West Asia, the studied terrapin is found significantly more often in parks and other recreational areas (Fig. 3) compared with Europe and East Asia. The proportion of records in habitat 2 (Fig. 3) in West Asia is significantly less than in Europe and East Asia. The proportion of records in nature environments (habitat 1), i.e., outside human settlements, does not differ in the three regions (p = 0.06): 16, 14 and 17.5% in Europe, West Asia and East Asia, respectively (Fig. 3).

Figure 3.

Comparison of the distribution of red-eared sliders among habitats in three different parts of the Eurasian invaded range. See details of habitat coding in Suppl. material 4. Whiskers show 95% Wald’s confidence intervals. A multiple comparison of proportions of the same habitat types in different parts of the invaded range was performed using the Chi-square (Biotope 1: 12.5, df = 2, p = 0.001; Biotope 2: 1378.8; df = 2, p < 0.001; Biotope 3: 5.8, df = 2, p = 0.06) and Tukey’s Post hoc tests. Significant differences between proportions of the same biotopes in different parts of the range are marked by *.

Number of terrapins per water body

The three regions with the highest number of observations, Europe, West Asia, and East Asia (Fig. 1a), have a remarkably higher percentage of water bodies with more than one red-eared slider individual per aquatic site compared with other parts of Eurasia: (χ2= 100.6, df = 6, P << 0.001) (Fig. 2b). The highest portion of such water bodies was observed in East Asia (72.9%); here, the proportion of these water bodies was significantly higher than in Europe, 43.0% (Z = 8.5, P << 0.01). The mean number of slider individuals per aquatic site was 23.2±9.6 (1–4288; n=490) for Europe; 10.1±2.6 (1–98; n=57) for West Asia; 61.8±31.9 (1–10000; n=318) for East Asia (observations with an estimated number of “several individuals” were excluded from this calculation). Proportion of larger groups increased over the years in Europe (see Suppl. material 5). Here, the greatest numbers (>200 ind. per water body; 1186.4±537.1 (250–4288; n=7)) were reported in the 2000s in Spain (regions of Doñana National Park and Valencia (Perez-Santigosa et al. 2008; Sancho and Lacomba 2013). In East Asia, the greatest number (>200 ind.; 1425.4±860.6 (212–10000; n=11)) were noted in several regions of Japan and China (e.g., Taniguchi et al. 2017; Gong et al. 2018). We are not aware of such large groups of red-eared sliders in other parts of Eurasia. Ignoring these 18 extra-populated water bodies, the mean number of individuals in groups was 15.4±2.5 (2–191; n=485) for Europe, 15.8±4.0 (2–98; n=35) for West Asia and 17.6±1.9 (2–200; n=220) for East Asia. The number of individuals per water body in Europe correlated negatively with latitude in the original/literature dataset even after excluding seven extra-populated (>200 ind.) water bodies in southern regions (R = –0.13; t(N–2)= –2.83; N = 485; p<0.01). Such correlation is absent for water bodies in West Asia and East Asia (R = –0.22; t(N–2)= –1.66; N = 57; NS and R = 0.02; t(N–2)=0.33; N = 305; NS, respectively). However, the number of individuals correlates negatively with longitude in West Asia (R = –0.29; t(N–2)= –2.22; N = 57; p<0.05) and positively in East Asia (R = 0.19; t(N–2)=–3.36; N = 305; p<0.001) reflecting association with coastal regions, the Mediterranean coast in West Asia and the Pacific (seas of Pacific Ocean) coast in China.

Body sizes

Diversity and proportions of observations (not water bodies) of various size classes of red-eared slider in parts of Eurasia are presented at Fig. 2c. Below we discuss an assessment of the proportions of water bodies (%) inhabited by individuals of different size classes. Small individuals, with carapace length ≤ 10cm, are detected rarely: in 8.0, 12.5 and 4.6% of water bodies of Europe, West Asia, and East Asia, respectively. Including the category “all sizes”, these percentages are 20.8, 33.3 and 70.4%, respectively. Big individuals with carapace length > 15cm were noted in aquatic sites of Europe, West Asia, and East Asia in 31.8, 52.1 and 17.5% or 88.1, 85.4 and 91.2% when including categories “adults” and “all sizes”. Very big terrapins (> 20cm) were confirmed in 14.8, 4.2 and 13.7% of areas, respectively. In Europe, the occurrence of small individuals (≤ 10cm; scores 1, 2, 7) negatively correlated with latitude (R = –0.24; t(N–2)= –3.72; N = 236; p<0.001), longitude (R = –0.25; t(N–2)= –4.00; N = 236; p<0.001), positively correlates with number per water body (R = 0.57; t(N–2)= 10.27; N = 215; p<0.001) whereas occurrence of very big individuals (score 5) positively correlated with latitude (R = 0.17; t(N–2)=2.72; N = 236; p<0.01) and negatively correlates with longitude (R = –0.20; t(N–2)= –3.09; N = 236; p<0.01). In West Asia, the occurrence of small individuals did not correlate with latitude or longitude (R = 0.16; t(N–2)=1.16; N = 48; NS and R = 0.16; t(N–2)=1.09; N = 48; NS); in East Asia, this size did not correlate with latitude (R = 0.06; t(N–2)=–0.20; N = 240; NS) but positively correlates with longitude R = 0.20; t(N–2)=3.18; N = 240; p<0.01). Therefore, occurrence of small-sized individuals positively correlates with coastal areas. Interestingly, in West Asia, registration of bigger individuals is more typical for water bodies with large groups of red-eared sliders and has increased over time (see Suppl. material 5).

Analysis of indices of the size diversity of terrapin individuals showed that in East Asia, Shannon’s index (H = 1.53 ± 0.012) is higher than in Europe (H = 1.38 ± 0.015) and West Asia (H = 0.19 ± 0.032), i.e., body size diversity in East Asia is higher than in the other two parts of the range (Fig. 4). Hutcheson’s test suggests the following ranked series for this index: H (East Asia) (t = 51.1; df = 220; p << 0.05) >> H (Europe) (t = 8.87; df = 114; p << 0.05) >> H (West Asia). Although data on the reproductive status in the studied parts of the range are limited, nevertheless, high H index values in East Asia and Europe suggest high size diversity with a sufficient number of both young and mature individuals in these parts of the range for the establishment of populations, if climatic conditions are appropriate.

Figure 4.

Shannon’s index of body size diversity (H) for three different parts of the Eurasian invaded range. Whiskers show 95% Hutcheson’s confidence interval.


In all parts of Eurasia, except West Asia, the highest number of observations are casual records of red-eared sliders without additional information on ecology. For example, in the most studied regions, Europe and East Asia, the appropriate percentages of casual records are 73.8 and 93.9%, respectively. Multiple cases of unsuccessful reproduction attempts (e.g., egg laying) were registered in Europe and the Trans-Caucasus region, whereas successful reproduction and even establishment of populations is reported from southern Europe, West Asia, East Asia, and Southeast Asia (Figs 1c, 2d). In European water bodies, successful wintering depended negatively on latitude (R = –0.23; t(N–2)=–6.22; N = 671; p<0.001; observations of successful reproduction and establishment of populations were also regarded as wintering points and included in the analysis here and below) and did not correlate with longitude (R = 0.03; t(N–2)=0.68; N = 671; NS) whereas successful wintering in West Asia and East Asia did not depend on latitude (R = 0.05; t(N–2)=0.42; N = 59; NS and R = 0.01; t(N–2)= 0.25; N = 586; NS, respectively). We found such a correlation with longitude for the water bodies of West Asia (R = –0.49; t(N–2)= –4.24; N = 59; p<0.0) and East Asia (R = 0.12; t(N–2)= 2.93; N = 586; p<0.01). We regarded the relationship between mortality during wintering and latitude using the example of the European part of Russia, a region with a remarkable climatic gradient of thermal conditions. Here, winter mortality was reported for 9.5% of water bodies. We did not find correlations between mortality events and latitude (R = 0.00; t(N–2) = 0.03; N = 73; NS) as dead individuals were registered in both northern (e.g., Saint-Petersburg, Moscow) and southern regions (e.g., Stavropol and Krasnodar territories, Voronezh province of Russia).

In Europe, reproduction is more effective in southwestern regions and positively correlates with terrapin abundance (see Suppl. material 5). In East Asia, reproduction is more successful in the eastern part. The registrations of reproduction have decreased over the years in both Europe and East Asia (see Suppl. material 5). The potential range of reproducing populations of the red-eared slider, as well as the potential range of successful wintering, are presented in Figs 5a, b.

Figure 5.

Potential distribution of the red-eared slider Trachemys scripta elegans, created with MaxEnt analysis of climatic requirements. a potential range of successful reproduction. Species Distribution Model has been built based on records of the native range of the red-eared slider within Northern America and records of successful reproduction and established populations within Eurasia (which are shown by yellow points) b potential range of successful wintering. Species Distribution Model has been built based on records used for Fig. 5a with the addition of records with confirmed successful wintering within Eurasia (which are shown by pink points).

Comparison of the mean values of the predictor variables shows that the niche centroids of the species in East Asia are characterized by relatively high values of mean air temperature in the warm season (T = 26.01 ± 0.46 °C, n = 35), precipitation (W = 676.4 ± 15.4, mm), climate moisture index (Mi = 0.4 ± 0.03), and total temperature above 0 °C (SigmaT = 7.78 * 104 ± 3207 °C) (Fig. 6). Some niche centroids in West Asia occupy an intermediate position (T = 23.4 ± 0.49 °C; n = 31; SigmaT = 5.868 * 104 ± 3408 °C; n = 31) compared to centroids in Europe and East Asia. The moisture index in the West Asian part of the range (Mi = -0.33 ± 0.03; n = 31) is significantly lower than in East Asia, but does not differ from Europe (Mi = -0.27 ± 0.02, n = 75). Concerning precipitation in the warm season, the niche of the red-eared slider in West Asia is characterized by the lowest precipitation (W = 82.3 ± 16.7 mm; n = 31). The centroids of temperature (T = 19.3 ± 0.32 °C, n = 75) and the sum of temperatures (SigmaT = 3.671 * 104 ± 2191 °C, n = 75) in Europe are characterized by the lowest values, do not differ in the humidity index from the West Asian part of the range, and occupy an intermediate position in terms of precipitation in the warm season of the year. The centroids of niches in East Asia differ significantly from two other analyzed parts of the range for all studied predictor variables (Fig. 6). Comparison of the mean values of the Log-transformed predictor variables using GLM ANOVA is presented in Suppl. material 8: fig. S4. It can be seen that Fig. 6 and Suppl. material 8: fig. S4 similarly display niche centroid positions across all predictor variables. The normal distribution of GLM ANOVA residuals after Log-transformation for all variables suggests that conclusions regarding the significance of the centroid difference, established without data transformation, are correct.

Figure 6.

Comparison of mean values (± 95% Tukey HSD confidence intervals) of the main predictor variables of terrapin habitats in different parts of the invaded range. The results of one factor ANOVA based on General Linear Model are presented. The GLM ANOVA tested the main effects of regions: a F = 78.31, df = 2, p < 0.01 b F = 424.21, df = 2, P< 0.01 c F = 196.42, df = 2, p < 0.01 d F = 58.62, df = 2, p < 0.01 (F is Tukey HSD test; P-value is given for the factor effects). Significant differences of means according to Post hoc Tukey HSD test are marked by *. Absence of significant differences is marked as NS, i.e., values for Europe and West Asia do not differ from each other on Fig. 6c. Records with ecological characteristics 2–5 (see Methods) were used (so, we ignored casual records for this analysis).

A comparative analysis of the parameters of reproductive efforts in Eurasia showed that centroids 2 and 3 (wintering and egg laying) significantly differ from 4 and 5 (successful reproduction and establishment of populations) (Fig. 7). We combined centroids of 2 and 3 and presented them as level I and combined 4 and 5 as level II. The appropriate mean values and ranges of values for level I (n = 100) in Eurasia are as follows: T = 20.6 (range 19.1–21.21) °C; W = 298.5 (206.3–390.7) mm; Mi = -0.17 (-0.31 – -0.04); SigmaT = 4.152*104 (3.22*104–5.084*104) °C and for level II (n = 41) are: T = 25.5 (24.4–26.7) °C; W=521.3 (410.2–631.0) mm; Mi = 0.15 (0.08–0.3); SigmaT = 7.294*104 (6.185*104–8.404*104) °C. A comparative analysis of the parameters of reproductive efforts in Eurasia with Log-transformed data is presented in Suppl. material 8: fig. S4. Importantly, the results of comparing the niche centroids did not differ regardless of whether the original data are Log-transformed or not. Since the residuals of the GLM ANOVA models after Log-transformation of the predictor variables did not differ from the normal distribution, we therefore limited our comparison to mean values only.

Figure 7.

Comparison of mean values (± 95% Tukey HSD confidence intervals) of main predictor variables of terrapin habitats for records with different ecological/reproductive statuses. The results of one factor ANOVA based on General Linear Model (GLM) are presented. The GLM ANOVA tested the main effects of reproduction status (where 2 is confirmed successful overwintering; 3 is unsuccessful reproduction attempts, 4 is confirmed successful reproduction, 5 is established population): a F=23.5, df = 3, p < 0.01 b F = 20.92, df = 3, p < 0.01 c F = 19.7, df = 3, p < 0.01 d F = 24.4, df = 3, p < 0.01 (F is Tukey HSD test; p value is given for the factor effects). Statistically significant differences of means according to Post hoc Tukey HSD test between 4 and 2, 3 (separately) is marked by *; statistically significant differences of means between 5 and 2, 3 (separately) is marked by **. We did not compare means of categories 2 and 3 as they are rather similar. The same is true for 4 and 5.


Spatio-temporal dynamics

The earliest reports of the red-eared slider in outdoor water bodies of Eurasia originate from the late 1960s – early 1970s in Europe (Rumburk, Czech Republic), where this animal was recorded in 1968 (Moravec and Široký 2006), and East Asia (Okinawa Island, Japan), with detection in 1972 (Shimazu 2015). Soon after, this alien was also first detected in West Asia (Bethlehem, Israel) in 1975 (Bouskila 1986). Up to the beginning of 21st century, outdoor occurrence of the species under study was restricted mainly to Europe and East Asia, with less frequent reports in West Asia and Southeast Asia (Fig. 1b). Contrary to the invasion histories of some “classical” invaders such as the insect Agrilus planipennis or fish Perccottus glenii (e.g., Reshetnikov and Ficetola 2011; Orlova-Bienkowskaja et al. 2020), colonization by the red-eared slider did not have a limited number of initial introductions which became sources of secondary distribution with the potential establishment of invaded subranges. The geographical expansion of this reptile was driven by massive propagule pressure in different regions over the huge territory of Eurasia. Nevertheless, Europe and East Asia were the regions with earliest and greatest dissemination compared with other parts of the continent (Fig. 1b). To date, this terrapin species is present in almost all countries of Eurasia (Fig. 1a). It has been reported from 68 Eurasian countries. The original list of Eurasian countries colonized by red-eared slider is available in the Suppl. material 9.

Invasion ecology

Of course, data on ecological characteristics of the red-eared slider for some water bodies may be absent due to lack of appropriate observations. Nevertheless, our large-scale spatio-temporal approach (invasion within all of Eurasia during a 50-year period) reduces possible inaccuracies and allows us to reconstruct the invasion process within the studied continent. Our comprehensive database of primary data allowed us to compare ecological features of the red-eared slider in different parts of Eurasia. We found that the ecological niche of reproductive groups of the red-eared slider in East Asia differs from those in Europe and West Asia in terms of thermal energy and moisture (Fig. 6). This may be explained by the absence of the whole range of appropriate favorable environmental conditions in Europe and West Asia. Breeding groups of this invader are likely to occupy habitats with more favorable climatic conditions in East Asia, with higher temperature and humidity compared with other parts of Eurasia (Fig. 6). Despite the absence of appropriate records of reproductive success, our modelling confirms the existence of large territories favorable for reproduction in non-coastal regions of China and Azerbaijan, and southern Turkey, as well as limited regions of several other countries, including Kazakhstan (south), Iran (north), India, Nepal and others (Fig. 5).

Importantly, the red-eared slider inhabits mainly urban and rural environments (Fig. 2d) because the principal invasion vector is pet release (Semenov 2010; Banha et al. 2017). It is not surprising that synanthropic groups of this terrapin are more abundant, as it has been shown for Europe and West Asia. However, the distribution of red-eared sliders is not limited by territories of human settlements, where this terrapin is often used for decoration of ponds. This invader has already been detected in natural environments, i.e., outside human settlements, in most parts of Eurasia (Fig. 2a). In Europe and East Asia, the proportion of records in natural habitats reaches 16–17%. In West Asia, records in natural water bodies amount 13.7%. This reflects the unavoidable dispersion of these animals from points of initial introductions (e.g., urban and rural ponds) to other places. Pet terrapins can migrate to natural habitats both through the hydrological network and over land; however, at least in some cases, they were introduced directly into nature (e.g., Doñana National Park, Perez-Santigosa et al. 2008).

Recorded red-eared slider numbers may entirely (in regions without reproduction) or partly (in regions with reproduction) reflect past human activities, i.e., accumulation of human-released slider individuals, a phenomenon defined as “invasion debt” (Essl et al. 2011). Commonly, aquatic sites with red-eared sliders have one terrapin individual per water body, however the number varies and mean values are tens of individuals for different parts of Eurasia, with the highest abundance in East Asia, where the mean value is 62 individuals per water body. High numbers and biomass of this alien hydrobiont produces risks for native freshwater ecosystems (Cadi and Joly 2004; Lee et al. 2016; Salerno and van den Burg 2021). In Eurasia, the number of sliders may reach thousands of individuals per aquatic site (Perez-Santigosa et al. 2008; Sancho and Lacomba 2013; Taniguchi et al. 2017; Gong et al. 2018). Therefore, this alien reptile became a target of eradication campaigns in this region from the early 2000s (e.g., Sancho and Lacomba 2013). However, despite possible local success, our review did not reveal any signs of decrease in terrapin abundance over the years, or signs of decreasing geographical range on the all-Eurasian scale (see Suppl. material 5; Fig. 1b).

Our results show a higher density of records of the slider in Europe and East Asia (Fig. 1b). The density of records may correlate positively with the density of human population (Banha et al. 2017). Propagule pressure (the number of release events) is often positively correlated with human population density, whereas survival and reproductive success of terrapins depends mainly on climate conditions, i.e., fundamental niche. Therefore, both climatic and anthropic factors are important to this terrapin for invasion. Analyzing invasion ecology, we found that many characteristics of invasion success (e.g., higher portion of inhabited natural water bodies, higher number of individuals per water body, successful overwintering, presence of juvenile individuals, successful reproduction and establishment of populations) tend to be present in coastal regions, such as the Mediterranean coast of southern Europe, the western part of West Asia, the Pacific coast of East Asia and islands. The coastal regions could have milder thermic and more favorable humidity regimes, which are important for the reproduction of this reptile.

Reproductive success depends on several key environmental parameters (Fig. 7). Assessing bioclimatic differences between presence and reproduction occurrence is important (Ficetola et al. 2009; Heidy Kikillus et al. 2010). For example, despite a great number of occurrence records in Europe, the establishment of self-sustained populations of this terrapin has been proved only for southern regions of Europe in Spain, Italy and southern France (Cadi et al. 2004; Perez-Santigosa et al. 2008; Ficetola et al. 2009; Crescente et al. 2014). On the other hand, specialists report successful reproduction in a larger number of localities and do not exclude the possibility of established populations in Portugal, Greece, Croatia, Slovenia, and Serbia, in locations where a similar Mediterranean climate is prevalent (Bruekers et al. 2006; Đorđević and Anđelković 2015; Standfuss et al. 2016; Koren et al. 2018; Martins et al. 2018; Tzoras et al. 2018; Urošević et al. 2019; our data). Of course, some observed groups of terrapin may be at different stages of invasion debt (Essl et al. 2011), with potential establishment of populations in the future, after the accumulation of human-released individuals of reproductive age and/or due to future climate alterations. In regions with suboptimal climatic conditions, e.g., lowland territories of Switzerland and Austria, and south Germany, the red-eared slider can also successfully reproduce but more rarely, only in some very hot summers (Bringsøe 2001; Wüthrich 2004; Pieh and Laufer 2006; Kleewein 2015; Schradin 2020). However, some above-mentioned data originate from open areas of zoos (Wüthrich 2004; Kleewein 2015), not from natural landscapes. Additionally, sometimes records of hatchlings from urban park ponds (Bringsøe 2001; Pieh and Laufer 2006) are difficult to separate from bought and released young-of-the-year juveniles (see facts and discussion in: Semenov 2010; Ficetola et al. 2012). Registration of reproductive efforts, i.e., female egg-laying behavior, is the least informative ecological parameter because it characterizes neither success of reproduction, nor physiological adaptation to local geographical conditions. Therefore, despite multiple registrations of unsuccessful reproduction efforts in some more northern countries of Europe, e.g., Belgium, the Netherlands, Denmark, Czech Republic, and Poland (Bringsøe 2001; Najbar 2001; Herder 2007; Brejcha et al. 2010; Verbelen 2021), temperature conditions in those countries are, possibly, much less favorable for successful development of embryos at the present time (Fig. 5a).

In the current analysis (Fig. 1c), the northernmost countries of successful reproduction of this reptile in West Asia and East Asia are Turkey, Japan and Republic of Korea (Çiçek and Ayaz 2015; Taniguchi et al. 2017; Koo and Sung 2019). However, climatic conditions of even some more southern regions of Asia seem to be unsuitable for reproduction (Fig. 5a). We propose that cold mountain climates and lack of soil humidity of some other regions inhibit reproduction of the studied reptile. Indeed, the eggs of T. scripta have a skin envelope (Cagle 1944) and are less protected against desiccation compared with hard-shell eggs of some other terrapins (Tucker et al. 1998). Multi-year monitoring of groups of T. s. elegans individuals in an arid region do not reveal successful development of naturally laid eggs under extremely dry conditions (Drost et al. 2021), which further supports our hypothesis. Importantly, sex determination of embryos of the red-eared slider is temperature-dependent (Tucker et al. 2008). Only males appear under low incubation temperature; this feature is regarded as a possible limitation for the establishment of populations in northern regions, with insufficient thermal conditions for the production of both sexes (Cadi and Joly 2004; Heidy Kikillus et al. 2010). Additionally, red-eared sliders can inhabit thermal or heated water bodies with special microclimatic conditions and can benefit from a higher reproduction potential due to earlier maturation with greater body sizes, earlier start of the nesting season and larger clutch sizes (Thornhill 1982). For example, hatchlings of T. s. elegans may be recorded in thermal springs (e.g., in Bulgaria, Kornilev et al. 2020) outside areas of proven reproduction of this species. Among our dataset, the northernmost records of this slider in North Asia (e.g., West Siberia and Kamchatka peninsula) with rather severe climates are restricted to thermal reservoirs; however we have not found confirmation of survival and reproductive success in those localities (Fig. 1c).

Paradoxical expansion without reproduction

The results of all the species distribution models have some differences due to variations in datasets and climatic variable sets used. The calculated reproductive range of the red-eared slider in Eurasia in our study (Fig. 5a) is based on the most comprehensive dataset and significantly updates some earlier SDM prognoses of successful reproduction for this terrapin (Rödder et al. 2009; Heidy Kikillus et al. 2010). For instance, our model excludes England as an area favorable for reproduction. Analysis of the literature indirectly suggests our model may be suitable because there have not yet been reports confirming successful reproduction of the studied terrapin in England. Nevertheless, current geographical occurrence of this terrapin (Fig. 1b) is not limited to areas climatically suitable for successful reproduction (Fig. 5a). As the main invasion vector and driver is pet releases (García-Díaz et al. 2015), the geography of initial introductions does not depend on climate features. Despite the reproduction of this terrapin being restricted to a few regions of Eurasia with comparatively high summer temperatures and sufficient air humidity (Fig. 1c), the released red-eared slider tolerates a wide range of temperatures and does not depend on air humidity around recipient water bodies. Individuals of this species activate their feeding behavior when water temperature is above 10 °C (Parmenter 1980). Many lowland freshwater aquatic sites of Eurasia reach such thermal conditions during summer. So, this terrapin becomes included in the food webs of local ecosystems immediately after its release. It is assumed that even a few big individuals of red-eared slider are capable of damaging low-component ecosystems of small isolated water bodies like artificial ponds (Semenov 2010). However, numbers of this invader often reach much higher values in Eurasian water bodies (Fig. 2b). Thus, this reptile demonstrates wide expansion without establishment of populations. Recruitment of new individuals to “pseudopopulations” of the red-eared slider takes place due to additional releases. Once released, individuals of this terrapin may inhabit a water body up to 30–31 years (Frazer et al. 1990; Castanet 1994). As a result, despite the absence of reproduction in the most regions of Eurasia (Fig. 5a), its occurrence area has enlarged considerably from the end of 1960s to the late 2010s and presently covers a considerable portion of Eurasia (Fig. 1b).

Conditional invasion

The invasive status of a species assumes 1) naturalization, i.e., establishment of populations, and 2) remarkable negative impact on native species/ecosystems (Cadi et al. 2004; Standfuss et al. 2016). Thus, invasive status, sensu stricto, of this reptile is not confirmed for the majority of Eurasian countries because established populations are registered only in a few regions (Fig. 1c). However, keeping in mind its abnormally high propagule pressure (García-Díaz et al. 2015), ability to survive under suboptimal conditions (Willmore and Storey 1997), long life duration (Castanet 1994), increasing numbers (without reproduction) due to progressive cases of releases and continuing geographical expansion, this aquatic reptile has acquired invasive status without the establishment of reproducing populations in areas where it can survive for more than one year. Because of the lack of such an important feature as establishment of populations, this new type of invasion may be defined as a “conditional invasion”. This may be applied to this reptile within the area of successful wintering excluding the area of successful reproduction.

Wintering range as an important criterion for risk assessment

Successful wintering is registered for all parts of the continent (Figs 1c, 2d, 5b). The only hitherto known confirmation of wintering in North Asia is restricted to the Far East region of Russia, with its mild marine climate. We do not have confirmation of successful overwintering in other regions of North Asia, which are characterized by a severe continental climate with low winter temperatures. Interestingly, during severe winters with subzero temperatures in southern regions, some individuals may die but others can survive in the same water body (Stoyanov 2015). On the other hand, wintering success can differ in different years depending on weather conditions (Reshetnikov and Sokolov 2020). Climatic thresholds for successful wintering may be explained by physiological restrictions. Red-eared sliders usually hibernate on the bottom of water bodies and the aquatic environment reliably protects them against subzero temperatures if a layer of water remains between the ice and bottom of the water body. Importantly, during hibernation, this terrapin can tolerate near-zero positive temperatures, as well as considerable deficit and even short-term absence of oxygen (Ultsch 2006); therefore, this species is sometimes regarded as a facultative anaerobe (Willmore and Storey 1997). Theoretically, crucial criteria for survival may be: 1) duration of winter ice-covering period because the red-eared slider does not survive if anoxic conditions last longer than 44–50 days (Ultsch 2006); 2) number of days with water temperature above 10 °C in the warm period, impacting the condition of the terrapin body prior to wintering, e.g., lipid reserve, necessary for long hibernation without exogenous feeding. Such body condition is difficult to reach in northern and mountainous regions with a brief warm season, as well as in internal areas of the continent with a severe continental climate. In such regions, climatic limitations of successful wintering may be non-direct: this animal survives under low water temperatures, but is deprived of the necessary physiological reserves that might prepare it to tolerate a prolonged period of unfavorable conditions. Calculated limitations of wintering in some regions in the south of Asia (Fig. 5b) are less understandable. Theoretically, the main limiting factors may be related to high temperatures and water deficit, especially for vast arid areas of Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Oman, Iraq and Afghanistan. However, we cannot exclude year-round existence of the red-eared slider in oases with permanent aquatic sites.

We propose the “range of successful wintering” as a territory at risk for true invasion as well as for conditional invasion. This non-standard (for a reptile) characteristic, i.e., wintering range, must be taken in account when planning eradication campaigns or other measures of control of the red-eared slider.


The geographical expansion of the red-eared slider started in the 1960–1970s from two opposite sides of Eurasia, i.e., Europe and East Asia, and was driven by massive propagule pressure in different regions over its huge territory. The invasive range of this terrapin enlarged gradually in Eurasia up to the beginning of the 2020s covering 68 Eurasian countries. In particular, we report original data outlining recent first detections of this alien terrapin in the following countries: Bangladesh, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Nepal, Pakistan, Tajikistan, as well as Russian Siberia (drainages of rivers Ob and Yenisei). Regions of successful reproduction of this ectotherm in Eurasia are well-predictable on the basis of climatic features of the native geographic range but may be altered because of progressing global climate change. Analyses of invasion ecology confirm that coastal regions and islands show the most prominent expression of diverse signs of invasion success in terms of a higher portion of inhabited natural water bodies, higher number of individuals per water body, successful overwintering, occurrence of juvenile individuals, successful reproduction, and establishment of populations. Notably, a great number of established groups of this reptile in different regions of Eurasia do not meet the conditions for successful reproduction.

In this pet terrapin we have an excellent but rare example of wide geographic expansion without the establishment of (reproducing) populations but through the recruitment of new individuals to growing (non-reproducing) pseudopopulations due to additional releases. Therefore, we highlight the significance of the wintering range. This range must be taken in account when planning measures of control of this invader because non-reproducing groups of this terrapin may become a significant component of freshwater ecosystems with impact on native species. Thus, a cost-effective conservation strategy against the red-eared slider in large countries with a variety of climatic zones may differ for three geographical areas: 1) area of true invasion (within potential reproduction range), 2) area of conditional invasion (within potential wintering range but outside potential reproduction range), and 3) area without potential for reproduction and wintering. Nevertheless, some protective measures (i.e., banning of import and trade) are effective only on an all-country level and therefore must be applied at national levels. Finally, we encourage further accumulation of empirical knowledge on the invasion ecology of the red-eared slider in newly-invaded regions, especially in North Asia and South Asia, to establish a deeper understanding of its adaptive limits and role in Eurasian native ecosystems.


We are thankful to subject editor K. Faulkner and two anonymous reviewers for valuable suggestions on the manuscript, M. Vamberger for discussion of terrapin ecology in Germany, J. Lovich for discussion of subspecies features, N.N. Suryadna for discussion of records in the Black Sea region, T.V. Abduraupov, Pritpal Soorae and D. Verbelen for help with literature in Uzbekistan, UAE and Belgium respectively, T. Rautenberg for providing photographs for identification of terrapins observed in Essen. We greatly appreciate A.V. Zhulina and A.A. Zibrova for their help with an illustration for a Suppl. material, photographer E.S. Malafeeva for portrait of red-eared slider for graphical abstract, and J.A. Titova for linguistic corrections. We are also sincerely grateful to the 52 persons who kindly provided the additional observations of red-eared sliders in open water bodies of Eurasia (the full list of the persons see in the Suppl. material 10). The work was partly supported by RSF, project no. 21-14-00123.


  • Aiello-Lammens ME, Boria RA, Radosavljevic A, Vilela B, Anderson RP (2015) spThin: An R package for spatial thinning of species occurrence records for use in ecological niche models. Ecography 38(5): 541–545.
  • Banha F, Gama M, Anastácio PM (2017) The effect of reproductive occurrences and human descriptors on invasive pet distribution modelling: Trachemys scripta elegans in the Iberian Peninsula. Ecological Modelling 360: 45–52.
  • Barbet-Massin M, Jiguet F, Albert CH, Thuiller W (2012) Selecting pseudo-absences for species distribution models: How, where and how many? Methods in Ecology and Evolution 3(2): 327–338.
  • Beck KG, Zimmerman K, Schardt JD, Stone J, Lukens RR, Reichard S, Randall J, Cangelosi AA, Cooper D, Thompson JP (2008) Invasive species defined in a policy context: Recommendations from the Federal Invasive Species Advisory Committee. Invasive Plant Science and Management 1(4): 414–421.
  • Blackburn TM, Pyšek P, Bacher S, Carlton JT, Duncan RP, Jarošík V, Wilson JRU, Richardson DM (2011) A proposed unified framework for biological invasions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 26(7): 333–339.
  • Bouskila A (1986) On the danger of spreading of the red-eared terrapin, Chrysemys scripta, in natural habitats in Israel. Hardun 4: 27–30.
  • Brejcha J, Miller V, Jeřábková L, Šandera M (2010) Zaznamenávání výskytu želvy nádherné (Trachemys scripta) na území ČR v roce 2010. Herpetologické informace 9: 18–24.
  • Bringsøe H (2001) Trachemys scripta (Schoepff, 1792) – Buchstaben-Schmuckschildkröte. In: Fritz U (Ed.) Handbuch der Reptilien und Amphibien Europas. Aula, Wiebelsheim, Germany, 525–583.
  • Bruekers J, Uijtterschout G, Brouwer A (2006) Erstnachweis einer natürlichen Vermehrung der Rotwangen-Schmuckschildkröte (Trachemys scripta elegans) auf der griechischen Insel Kos. Schildkröten im Fokus 3: 29–34.
  • Cadi A, Joly P (2003) Competition for basking places between the endangered European pond turtle (Emys orbicularis galloitalica) and the introduced red-eared slider (Trachemys scripta elegans). Canadian Journal of Zoology 81(8): 1392–1398.
  • Cadi A, Joly P (2004) Impact of the introduction of the red-eared slider (Trachemys scripta elegans) on survival rates of the European pond turtle (Emys orbicularis). Biodiversity and Conservation 13(13): 2511–2518.
  • Cadi A, Delmas V, Prévot-Julliard A-C, Joly P, Pieau C, Girondot M (2004) Successful reproduction of the introduced slider turtle (Trachemys scripta elegans) in the South of France. Aquatic Conservation 14(3): 237–246.
  • Capinha C, Seebens H, Cassey P, García‐Díaz P, Lenzner B, Mang T, Moser D, Pyšek P, Rödder D, Scalera R, Winter M, Dullinger S, Essl F (2017) Diversity, biogeography and the global flows of alien amphibians and reptiles. Diversity & Distributions 23(11): 1313–1322.
  • Çiçek K, Ayaz D (2015) Does the red-eared slider (Trachemys scripta elegans) breed in Turkey? Hyla. Herpetological Bulletin 1: 4–10.
  • Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) (2016) 2016/1141 of 13 July 2016 adopting a list of invasive alien species of Union concern pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 1143/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
  • Crescente A, Sperone E, Paolillo G, Bernabò I, Brunelli E, Tripepi S (2014) Nesting ecology of the exotic Trachemys scripta elegans in an area of Southern Italy (Angitola Lake, Calabria). Amphibia-Reptilia 35(3): 366–370.
  • Demkowska-Kutrzepa M, Studzińska M, Roczeń-Karczmarz M, Tomczuk K, Abbas Z, Różański P (2018) A review of the helminths co-introduced with Trachemys scripta elegans – a threat to European native turtle health. Amphibia-Reptilia 39(2): 177–189.
  • Di Cola V, Broennimann O, Petitpierre B, Breiner FT, D’Amen M, Randin C, Engler R, Pottier J, Pio D, Dubuis A, Pellissier L, Mateo RG, Hordijk W, Salamin N, Guisan A (2017) Ecospat: An R package to support spatial analyses and modeling of species niches and distributions. Ecography 40(6): 774–787.
  • Đorđević S, Anđelković M (2015) Possible reproduction of the red-eared slider, Trachemys scripta elegans (Reptilia: Testudines: Emydidae), in Serbia, under natural conditions. Hyla. Herpetological Bulletin 1: 44–49.
  • Drost CA, Lovich JE, Rosen PC, Malone M, Garber SD (2021) Non-native pond sliders cause long-term decline of native Sonora mud turtles: A 33-year before-after study in an undisturbed natural environment. Aquatic Invasions 16(3): 542–570.
  • Essl F, Dullinger S, Rabitsch W, Hulme PE, Hülber K, Jarošík V, Kleinbauer I, Krausmann F, Kühn I, Nentwig W, Vilà M, Genovesi P, Gherardi F, Desprez-Loustau M-L, Roques A, Pyšek P (2011) Socioeconomic legacy yields an invasion debt. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108(1): 203–207.
  • Ficetola GF, Thuiller W, Padoa-Schioppa E (2009) From introduction to the establishment of alien species: Bioclimatic differences between presence and reproduction localities in the slider turtle. Diversity & Distributions 15(1): 108–116.
  • Ficetola GF, Rödder D, Padoa-Schioppa E (2012) Trachemys scripta (Slider terrapin). In: Francis RA (Ed.) Handbook of global freshwater invasive species. Taylor & Francis Group, London, England, 331–339.
  • Frazer N, Gibbons JW, Greene JL (1990) Life tables of a slider turtle population. In: Gibbons JW (Ed.) Life History and Ecology of the Slider Turtles. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, 183–200.
  • García-Díaz P, Ross JV, Ayres C, Cassey P (2015) Understanding the biological invasion risk posed by the global wildlife trade: Propagule pressure drives the introduction and establishment of Nearctic turtles. Global Change Biology 21(3): 1078–1091.
  • Gong S, Yang J, Ge Y, Gaillard D (2018) Extent and mechanisms of the increasing geographic distribution of the alien red-eared slider (Trachemys scripta elegans) in China. Yesheng Dongwu 39: 373–378.
  • Hair JF, Anderson Jr RE, Tatham RL, Black WC (1995) Multivariate Data Analysis. Macmillan, New York, USA.
  • Halvorsen R, Mazzoni S, Dirksen J, Næsset E, Gobakken T, Ohlson M (2016) How important are choice of model selection method and spatial autocorrelation of presence data for distribution modelling by MaxEnt? Ecological Modelling 328: 108–118.
  • Heidy Kikillus K, Hare KM, Hartley S (2010) Minimizing false-negatives when predicting the potential distribution of an invasive species: A bioclimatic envelope for the red-eared slider at global and regional scales. Animal Conservation 13: 5–15.
  • Herder J (2007) Eerste eilegsels van roodwangschildpadden in Nederland. RAVON 9: 23–24.
  • Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology 25(15): 1965–1978.
  • Hijmans RJ, Etten JV, Sumner M, Cheng J, Baston D, Bevan A, Bivand R, Busetto L, Canty M, Fasoli B, Forrest D, Ghosh A, Golicher D, Gray J, Greenberg JA, Hiemstra P, Hingee K, Ilich A, Karney C, Mattiuzzi M, Mosher S, Naimi B, Nowosad J, Pebesma E, Lamigueiro OP, Racine EB, Rowlingson B, Shortridge A, Venables B, Wueest R (2022) Raster: Geographic Data Analysis and Modeling.
  • Iglesias R, García-Estévez JM, Ayres C, Acuña A, Cordero-Rivera A (2015) First reported outbreak of severe spirorchiidiasis in Emys orbicularis, probably resulting from a parasite spillover event. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 113(1): 75–80.
  • Jeschke JM, Strayer DL (2005) Invasion success of vertebrates in Europe and North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102(20): 7198–7202.
  • Kakuda A, Doi H, Souma R, Nagano M, Minamoto T, Katano I (2019) Environmental DNA detection and quantification of invasive red-eared sliders, Trachemys scripta elegans, in ponds and the influence of water quality. PeerJ 7: e8155.
  • Kleewein A (2015) Investigating temperature tolerance in wild broods of Trachemys scripta elegans (Reptilia: Testudines: Emydidae) in Austria. Hyla. Herpetological Bulletin 1: 28–35.
  • Koo KS, Sung H-C (2019) Analysis on the important environmental factors for reproduction of Trachemys scripta elegans in Jeju Island, South Korea. Korean Journal of Ecology and Environment 52(4): 378–384.
  • Koren T, Štih A, Burić I, Koller K, Lauš B, Zadravec M (2018) The current distribution of pond slider Trachemys scripta (Reptilia: Emydidae) in Croatia. Natura Sloveniae 20: 33–44.
  • Kornilev Y, Lukanov S, Pulev A, Slavchev M, Vacheva E, Vergilov V, Mladenov V, Georgieva R, Popgeorgiev G (2020) The alien Pond slider Trachemys scripta (Thunberg in Schoepff, 1792) in Bulgaria: Future prospects for an established and reproducing invasive species. Acta Zoologica Bulgarica 72: 571–581.
  • Lee DH, Kim YC, Chang MH, Kim S, Kim D, Kil J (2016) Current status and management of alien turtles in Korea. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment 25(5): 319–332.
  • Ma K, Shi H (2017) Red-Eared Slider Trachemys scripta elegans (Wied-Neuwied). In: Wan F, Jiang M, Zhan A (Eds) Biological Invasions and Its Management in China. Volume 2. Springer, Singapore, 49–76.
  • Martins BH, Fábia Azevedo F, Teixeira J (2018) First reproduction report of Trachemys scripta in Portugal Ria Formosa Natural Park, Algarve. Limnetica 37: 61–67.
  • Masin S, Bonardi A, Padoa-Schioppa E, Bottoni L, Ficetola GF (2014) Risk of invasion by frequently traded freshwater turtles. Biological Invasions 16(1): 217–231.
  • Moravec J, Široký P (2006) Trachemys scripta (Schoepff, 1792) – želva nádherná. In: Mlíkovský J, Stýblo P (Eds) Nepůvodní druhy fauny a flóry české republiky. ČSOP, Praha, 407–409.
  • Muscarella R, Galante PJ, Soley-Guardia M, Boria RA, Kass JM, Uriarte M, Anderson RP (2014) ENMeval: An R package for conducting spatially independent evaluations and estimating optimal model complexity for MaxEnt ecological niche models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 5(11): 1198–1205.
  • Nagano N, Oana S, Nagano Y, Arakawa Y (2006) A severe Salmonella enterica serotype Paratyphi B infection in a child related to a pet turtle, Trachemys scripta elegans. Japanese Journal of Infectious Diseases 59: 132–134.
  • Najbar B (2001) Żółw czerwonolicy Trachemys scripta elegans (Wied, 1983) w województwie lubuskim (zachodnia Polska). Przeglad Zoologiczny 45: 103–109.
  • O’Keeffe S (2009) The practicalities of eradicating red-eared slider turtles (Trachemys scripta elegans). Aliens. The Invasive Species Bulletin 28: 19–25.
  • Orlova-Bienkowskaja MJ, Drogvalenko AN, Zabaluev IA, Sazhnev AS, Peregudova EY, Mazurov SG, Komarov EV, Struchaev VV, Martynov VV, Nikulina TV, Bieńkowski AO (2020) Current range of Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire, an alien pest of ash trees, in European Russia and Ukraine. Annals of Forest Science 77(2): 29.
  • Parham JF, Papenfuss TJ, van Dijk PP, Wilson BS, Marte C, Schettino LR, Brian Simison W (2013) Genetic introgression and hybridization in Antillean freshwater turtles (Trachemys) revealed by coalescent analyses of mitochondrial and cloned nuclear markers. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 67(1): 176–187.
  • Parmenter RR (1980) Effects of food availability and water temperature on the feeding ecology of Pond sliders (Chrysemys s. scripta). Copeia 3(3): 503–514.
  • Pearson SH, Avery HW, Spotila JR (2015) Juvenile invasive red-eared slider turtles negatively impact the growth of native turtles: Implications for global freshwater turtle populations. Biological Conservation 186: 115–121.
  • Perez-Santigosa N, Díaz-Paniagua C, Hidalgo-Vila J (2008) The reproductive ecology of exotic Trachemys scripta elegans in an invaded area of southern Europe. Aquatic Conservation 18(7): 1302–1310.
  • Pérez-Santigosa N, Florencio M, Hidalgo-Vila J, Díaz-Paniagua C (2011) Does the exotic invader turtle, Trachemys scripta elegans, compete for food with coexisting native turtles? Amphibia-Reptilia 32(2): 167–175.
  • Petrosyan V, Osipov F, Bobrov V, Dergunova N, Omelchenko A, Varshavskiy A, Danielyan F, Arakelyan M (2020) Species distribution models and niche partitioning among unisexual Darevskia dahli and its parental bisexual (D. portschinskii, D. mixta) rock lizards in the Caucasus. Mathematics 8(8): 1329.
  • Pieh A, Laufer H (2006) Die Rotwangen-Schmuckschildkröte (Trachemys scripta elegans) in Baden-Wurttemberg – mit Hinweis auf eine Reproduktion im Freiland. Zeitschrift für Feldherpetologie 13: 225–234.
  • Polo-Cavia N, Gonzalo A, López P, Martín J (2010) Predator recognition of native but not invasive turtle predators by naïve anuran tadpoles. Animal Behaviour 80(3): 461–466.
  • Polo-Cavia N, López P, Martín J (2011) Aggressive interactions during feeding between native and invasive freshwater turtles. Biological Invasions 13(6): 1387–1396.
  • Ramsay NF, Ng PK, O’Riordan RM, Chou LM (2007) The red-eared slider (Trachemys scripta elegans) in Asia: a review. In: Gherardi F (Ed.) Biological invaders in inland waters: Profiles, distribution, and threats. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 161–174.
  • Reed RN, Gibbons JW (2003) Conservation status of the live U.S. nonmarine turtles in domestic and international trade. U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1–92.
  • Reshetnikov A (2013) Spatio-temporal dynamics of the expansion of rotan Perccottus glenii from West-Ukrainian centre of distribution and consequences for European freshwater ecosystems. Aquatic Invasions 8(2): 193–206.
  • Reshetnikov AN, Sokolov SG (2020) Detecting an alien reptile through parasitological analysis of the widely distributed alien fish Perccottus glenii. Russian Journal of Biological Invasions 11(4): 399–404.
  • Reshetnikov AN, Bashinskiy IV, Neymark LA, Bobrov VV (2018) Trachemys scripta (Schoepff, 1792). Subspecies Trachemys scripta elegans (Wied-Neuwied, 1839). In: Dgebuadze YY, Petrosyan VG, Khlyap LA (Eds) The most dangerous invasive species of Russia (Top-100). KMK Scientific Publ., Moscow, Russia, 980–986.
  • Rhodin AG, Iverson JB, Bour R, Fritz U, Georges A, Shaffer HB, van Dijk PP (2017) Turtles of the World: Annotated Checklist and Atlas of Taxonomy, Synonymy, Distribution, and Conservation Status (8th Edn.). Chelonian Research Foundation & Turtle Conservancy, 1–292.
  • Rödder D, Schmidtlein S, Veith M, Lötters S (2009) Alien invasive slider turtle in unpredicted habitat: A matter of niche shift or of predictors studied? PLoS ONE 4(11): e7843.
  • Salerno AP, van den Burg MP (2021) Predation of a live duckling (Anas platyrhynchos) by Trachemys scripta: Concerns for native avifauna in the non-native range of this widely established turtle? Herpetology Notes 14: 45–48.
  • Sancho V, Lacomba JI (2013) Expansion of Trachemys scripta in the Valencian Community (Eastern Spain), Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal. Proceedings of International Symposium on Freshwater Turtles Conservation 1, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal, 41–49.
  • Schradin C (2020) Successful reproduction of Trachemys scripta in the Altrhein of Kehl (Germany) and simultaneous increase of estimated population size. Herpetological Bulletin 154(154, Winter 2020): 1–7.
  • Seebens H, Bacher S, Blackburn TM, Capinha C, Dawson W, Dullinger S, Genovesi P, Hulme PE, van Kleunen M, Kühn I, Jeschke JM, Lenzner B, Liebhold AM, Pattison Z, Pergl J, Pyšek P, Winter M, Essl F (2020) Projecting the continental accumulation of alien species through to 2050. Global Change Biology.
  • Shen L, Shi H, Wang R, Liu D, Pang X (2011) An invasive species red-eared slider (Trachemys scripta elegans) carrying Salmonella pathogens in Hainan Island. Molecular Pathogens 2: 4.
  • Shimazu N (2015) Distribution of the terrestrial and freshwater turtles on the Nansei Islands. Report on the contents and results of the research.
  • Sillero N, Campos J, Bonardi A, Corti C, Creemers R, Crochet P-A, Crnobrnja Isailović J, Denoël M, Ficetola GF, Gonçalves J, Kuzmin S, Lymberakis P, de Pous P, Rodríguez A, Sindaco R, Speybroeck J, Toxopeus B, Vieites DR, Vences M (2014) Updated distribution and biogeography of amphibians and reptiles of Europe. Amphibia-Reptilia 35(1): 1–31.
  • Standfuss B, Lipovšek G, Fritz U, Vamberger M (2016) Threat or fiction: Is the pond slider (Trachemys scripta) really invasive in Central Europe? A case study from Slovenia. Conservation Genetics 17(3): 557–563.
  • Stoyanov A (2015) Registered high mortality of allochthon red-eared sliders (Trachemys scripta elegans) in an artificial pond in Sofia, Bulgaria. Hyla. Herpetological Bulletin 1: 65–69.
  • Taniguchi M, Lovich J, Mine K, Ueno S, Kamezaki N (2017) Unusual population attributes of invasive red-eared slider turtles (Trachemys scripta elegans) in Japan: Do they have a performance advantage? Aquatic Invasions 12(1): 97–108.
  • Telecky TM (2001) United States import and export of live turtles and tortoises. Turtle and Tortoise Newsletter 4: 8–13.
  • Thornhill GM (1982) Comparative reproduction of the turtle, Chrysemys scripta elegans, in heated and natural lakes. Journal of Herpetology 16(4): 347.
  • Title PO, Bemmels JB (2018) ENVIREM: An expanded set of bioclimatic and topographic variables increases flexibility and improves performance of ecological niche modeling. Ecography 41(2): 291–307.
  • Tucker JK, Filoramo NI, Paukstis GL, Janzen FJ (1998) Response of red-eared slider, Trachemys scripta elegans, eggs to slightly differing water potentials. Journal of Herpetology 32(1): 124.
  • Tucker JK, Dolan CR, Lamer JT, Dustman EA (2008) Climatic warming, sex Ratios, and Red-Eared Sliders (Trachemys scripta elegans) in Illinois. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 7(1): 60–69.
  • Tzoras E, Chiras G, Lozano A, Maluquer-Margalef J (2018) On a reproductive population of Trachemys scripta (Schoepff, 1792) at Kaiafa Lake in Western Peloponnese, Greece. Butlletí de la Societat Catalana d`Herpetologia 26: 28–32.
  • Ultsch GR (2006) The ecology of overwintering among turtles: Where turtles overwinter and its consequences. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 81(3): 339–367.
  • Urošević A, Popović M, Maričić M, Pomorišac G, Petrović D, Grabovac D, Surla A, Medenica I, Avramović S, Golubović A (2019) New data on the spread of Trachemys scripta (Thunberg in Schoepff, 1792) (Testudines: Emydidae) and its subspecies in Serbia. Acta Zoologica Bulgarica 71: 247–251.
  • van Dijk PP, Stuart BL, Rhodin AG (2000) Asian turtle trade. Proceedings of a Workshop on Conservation and Trade of Freshwater Turtles and Tortoises in Asia – Phnom Penh, Cambodia, 1–4 December 1999. Chelonian Research Foundation, Lunenburg Mass., 1–165.
  • Verbelen D (2021) Eerste gedocumenteerde gevallen eileg lettersierschildpadden in België. RAVON 80: 2–4.
  • Vitousek PM, D’Antonio CM, Loope LL, Westbrooks R (1996) Biological invasions as Global Environmental Change. American Scientist 84: 468–478.
  • Vodrážková M, Šetlíková I, Berec M (2020) Chemical cues of an invasive turtle reduce development time and size at metamorphosis in the common frog. Scientific Reports 10(1): e7978.
  • Willmore WG, Storey KB (1997) Antioxidant systems and anoxia tolerance in a freshwater turtle Trachemys scripta elegans. Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry 170(1–2): 177–185.
  • Wüthrich F (2004) Naturbruten im Jahr 2003 in der Schweiz. Testudo 13: 5–20.
  • Zar JH (2010) Biostatistical analysis, 5th Edn. Prentice-Hall/Pearson, Upper Saddle River, N.J.

Supplementary materials

Supplementary material 1 

List of literature sources with records of red-eared slider in Eurasia

Andrey N. Reshetnikov et al.

Data type: Pdf file

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License ( The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (164.43 kb)
Supplementary material 2 

Eurasian subregions as accepted in the current article

Andrey N. Reshetnikov et al.

Data type: Pdf file

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License ( The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (450.60 kb)
Supplementary material 3 

Data base of georeferenced records of Trachemys scripta elegans in Eurasia

Andrey N. Reshetnikov et al.

Data type: xls file

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License ( The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (275.00 kb)
Supplementary material 4 

Coding of collected field data

Andrey N. Reshetnikov et al.

Data type: Pdf file

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License ( The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (116.88 kb)
Supplementary material 5 

Correlation matrix for ecological and other parameters of the red-eared slider Trachemys scripta elegans in water bodies of Europe (a), West Asia (b) and East Asia (c)

Andrey N. Reshetnikov et al.

Data type: Pdf file

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License ( The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (128.34 kb)
Supplementary material 6 

Locations of the training areas based on the available occurrence records

Andrey N. Reshetnikov et al.

Data type: Pdf file

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License ( The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (518.59 kb)
Supplementary material 7 

Evaluation metrics for MaxEnt models made across a range of feature-class combinations and regularization multipliers

Andrey N. Reshetnikov et al.

Data type: Pdf file

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License ( The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (380.78 kb)
Supplementary material 8 

Comparison of mean values of the Log-transformed predictor variables

Andrey N. Reshetnikov et al.

Data type: Pdf file

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License ( The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (656.85 kb)
Supplementary material 9 

Original list of 68 Eurasian countries colonized by the red-eared slider Trachemys scripta elegans

Andrey N. Reshetnikov et al.

Data type: Pdf file

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License ( The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (120.56 kb)
Supplementary material 10 

Additional list of 52 persons who kindly provided their observations of red-eared sliders in open water bodies of Eurasia

Andrey N. Reshetnikov et al.

Data type: Pdf file

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License ( The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (109.67 kb)
login to comment