Research Article |
Corresponding author: Tim Adriaens ( tim.adriaens@inbo.be ) Academic editor: Moritz von der Lippe
© 2019 Tim Adriaens, Pieter Verschelde, Emma Cartuyvels, Bram D'hondt, Edward Vercruysse, Wouter van Gompel, Evy Dewulf, Sam Provoost.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Adriaens T, Verschelde P, Cartuyvels E, D'hondt B, Vercruysse E, van Gompel W, Dewulf E, Provoost S (2019) A preliminary field trial to compare control techniques for invasive Berberis aquifolium in Belgian coastal dunes. NeoBiota 53: 41-60. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.53.38183
|
Non-native Berberis aquifolium is an invasive species in Belgian coastal dunes. With its strong clonal growth through suckers, this evergreen shrub outcompetes native species and affects dune succession. To prevent further secondary spread and mitigate its impact, there was an urgent need for knowledge on the effectiveness of control measures, both at the plant and habitat level. Here, we report on a first control experiment. Individual B. aquifolium clones were subjected to one of four treatments (manual uprooting, foliar herbicide application, stem cutting followed by herbicide or salt application), with regrowth being measured up to one year after treatment. We analyzed the relationship between kill rate, treatment, dune area, plant volume and number of plant stems using a generalized linear model. Berberis aquifolium plants proved most susceptible to foliar herbicide application (5% glyphosate solution), resulting in 88% (64%–97%) of the clones dying after treatment. The predicted kill rate decreased with an increasing number of stems under all treatments. We discuss the limitations of our experiment and the potential for actual field application of the different treatments. We present some guidelines for future control that may become further refined as experience builds up and we provide some recommendations for tackling invasive alien species in Atlantic dune ecosystems.
control, glyphosate, invasive alien species, Mahonia, management, oregon-grape, removal, shrub
The Belgian coastal dunes form a dynamic and diverse ecosystem that is home to a large number of characteristic species, many of which are regionally threatened (
Berberis aquifolium is a successful neophyte that colonizes both natural and anthropogenic habitats and is found in a wide range of habitat types (grasslands, forests, coastal dunes …) where it shows remarkable phenotypic plasticity (
In Belgium, B. aquifolium was first recorded in the wild in 1906 and naturalized in the period 1920–1950 (
Distribution of Berberis aquifolium in Flanders at a 1 km2 scale (
Distribution of Berberis aquifolium (2007–2015) in the study area with management trial locations within four dune sites along the Belgian coast.
Non-native tree, liana and shrub species established within the Belgian coastal dunes, in decreasing order of occurrence (% of dune areas and infected area in square meters based on field surveys in 46 nature reserves). Populus alba/canescens and P. candicans are frequently planted non-native tree species in the dunes but were not part of the survey. The Environmental Impact Assessment score for Belgium is added (ISEIA;
Species | Growth form | ISEIA | Surface area (m²) | % dune areas |
Rosa rugosa | Shrub | B3 | 56757 | 63 |
Berberis aquifolium | Shrub | A2 | 34035 | 50 |
Prunus serotina | Tree | A3 | 5461 | 52 |
Syringa vulgaris | Shrub | – | 4544 | 30 |
Ribes odoratum | Shrub | – | 2986 | 11 |
Symphoricarpos spp. | Shrub | – | 2874 | 26 |
Robinia pseudoacacia | Tree | – | 1458 | 4 |
Cotoneaster spp. | Shrub | – | 1392 | 41 |
Lycium barbarum | Shrub | – | 420 | 15 |
Ailanthus altissima | Tree | A2 | 209 | 9 |
Tamarix spp. | Shrub | – | 169 | 9 |
Elaeagnus spp. | Shrub | – | 108 | 11 |
Lonicera spp. | Liana | – | 106 | 13 |
Prunus spp. | Tree | – | 88 | 13 |
Parthenocissus spp. | Liana | B3 | 83 | 4 |
Ligustrum ovalifolium | Shrub | – | 72 | 9 |
Ribes sanguineum | Shrub | – | 58 | 26 |
Amelanchier spp. | Shrub | – | 44 | 9 |
Yucca spp. | Tree-like succulent | – | 25 | 15 |
Cornus spp. | Shrub | – | 15 | 24 |
Baccharis halimifolia | Shrub | A1 | 13 | 11 |
Buddleja davidii | Shrub | B3 | 7 | 7 |
Euonymus japonica | Shrub | – | 5 | 2 |
Pseudosasa japonica | Shrub | – | 4 | 2 |
Rosa spp. | Shrub | A3 | 4 | 4 |
Quercus spp. | Tree | – | 3 | 4 |
Sorbus spp. | Tree | – | 2 | 4 |
Viburnum spp. | Shrub | – | 1 | 2 |
Considering the current level of infestation of the dunes (Table
Experimental treatment of a selection of individuals with limited clonal extension was set up in four heavily infested dune sites (Figs
Number of Berberis aquifolium plants treated per dune area. LEAF = glyphosate leaf treatment, DIG = manual uprooting, STUB = cut and paint glyphosate, SALT = cut and paint salt solution.
Site | Location | LEAF | DIG | STUB | SALT | Total |
Westhoek | 51°05'06"N, 2°33'47"E | 8 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 33 |
Houtsaegerduinen | 51°06'02"N, 2°36'10"E | 7 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 24 |
Noordduinen | 51°06'15"N, 2°37'48"E | 6 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 25 |
Plaatsduinen | 51°07'29"N, 2°41'11"E | 10 | 10 | 8 | 8 | 36 |
Total | 31 | 33 | 29 | 25 | 118 |
A minority of treated plants (8 out of 118) showed limited regrowth after one year. We therefore lumped limited and vigorous regrowth and considered those plants as vital after treatment. The product of plant diameter and plant height was used as a proxy for plant volume. We then investigated the relationship between kill rate (%), treatment (as a categorical variable with 4 values), dune area (as a categorical variable with 4 values), plant volume and number of stems using a generalized linear model with a binomial distribution and logit link (
The data underpinning the analysis reported in this paper are deposited in the Dryad Data Repository at https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.zkh189361.
Of the 118 treated plants, 45 were found dead, 8 exhibited limited regrowth and 65 were still found vital after treatment. Regrowth differed between treatments (Fisher’s Exact, p < 0.001) but not between dune areas (Fisher’s Exact, p = 38). Spraying Berberis foliage with herbicides clearly resulted in superior control with the majority of plants (26 out of 31) being killed. Salt treatment hardly affected regrowth as almost all plants (23 out of 25) remained vital after cut and paint with a salt solution. Digging (12 out of 33 killed) and stem treatment (13 out of 20 killed) showed intermediate kill rates (Fig.
Number of vital and damaged Berberis aquifolium plants per treatment. Salt = cut and paint salt solution, Dig = manual uprooting, Stub = cut and paint glyphosate, Leaf = glyphosate leaf treatment.
Modelled kill rate as a function of the number of plant stems under different treatments. Salt = cut and paint salt solution, Dig = manual uprooting, Stub = cut and paint glyphosate, Leaf = glyphosate leaf treatment.
Modelled kill rate estimates (95% CI) for different treatments. Salt = cut and paint salt solution, Dig = manual uprooting, Stub = cut and paint glyphosate, Leaf = glyphosate leaf treatment. For ease of comparison we plotted the average predictions across all dune areas for the median amount of stems (10) and the mean log(volume) (5.2). Significant differences between treatments were tested with a post-hoc Tukey test. Treatments with the same letters above are not significantly different (p < 0.05).
Ornamental exotic species are increasingly causing problems for native biodiversity in Belgian coastal dunes. As the dunes are highly fragmented by urban development, the gardens surrounding the sites are the primary source of these plant species (
Parameter | Est. | SE | P |
TreatmentSalt | 0.7197 | 1.8788 | 0.70168 |
TreatmentDig | 2.8180 | 1.8148 | 0.12048 |
TreatmentStub | 3.5178 | 1.9676 | 0.07381 |
TreatmentLeaf | 5.3483 | 1.9388 | 0.00581*** |
RegionNoordduinen | 0.6100 | 0.6856 | 0.37365 |
RegionPlaatsduinen | 0.1144 | 0.7596 | 0.88033 |
RegionWesthoek | 1.4214 | 0.7336 | 0.05268 |
log(Volume) | -0.6238 | 0.4031 | 0.12171 |
log(N_stems) | -0.9658 | 0.5616 | 0.08546 |
Foliar application of a 5% glyphosate solution seemed by far the most effective way to remove isolated B. aquifolium clones, suggesting good uptake of the active compound through the stomata despite the species’ glossy, leathery leaves. Manual uprooting of individuals is labor intensive and regrowth from thin root or stolon fragments is nearly inevitable. Cutting, even with glyphosate stem treatment, gives poor results and therefore seems inadequate. However, our experiments only included a single cut and we do not know the results of several years of mowing. Also, the results of the described experiment only give an impression of the aboveground regrowth after one year. Excavation of a number of individuals revealed that some roots did reshoot, even if the aboveground parts of the plant looked completely dead. Kill rates were therefore probably overestimated and retreating sites will probably be necessary in order to obtain complete removal or at least more accurate figures on the success of each treatment.
The results described here are in contrast with
Non-target effects of a proposed management method on the environment, economy or society are important to consider when deciding on management options for invasive species (
Optimizing the use of herbicides currently seems the most appropriate way to tackle B. aquifolium. The technique of leaf spraying is particularly useful in dunes which are inaccessible for heavy machinery, or in situations where mechanical removal using machines is inappropriate because of great conservation value or sensitivity of the local habitat. In our experiments, we followed the general advice for glyphosate application in P. serotina management. Herbicide treatments were performed on days without rain to prevent solution run-off from the leaves and on days with an outside air temperature below 25 °C to maximize the efficiency of the active compound glyphosate. Further experiments should be carried out, however, testing different types and concentrations of herbicide and optimal treatment timing and conditions. As B. aquifolium is an evergreen shrub and its flowers are conspicuous, it can easily be detected throughout the year. However, it often occurs under or in between native Hippophae rhamnoides where plants can be a lot harder to detect or (re)treat and where non-target effects of control are more difficult to prevent. Also, some of the dune areas are grazed by introduced cattle as a management technique. The effect of grazing on B. aquifolium is unknown although grazers can defoliate older plants. The choice of method should reflect on the characteristics of each site. For example, the experiments described here were performed in nature reserves and were therefore not allowed during the breeding season. Although potentially more cost effective and broadly applicable, chemical control might not be the preferred option everywhere. We acknowledge many questions might need to be addressed before chemical control can become a viable option. For example, the use of herbicides is heavily restricted near areas used for drinking water extraction, several of which are located in the coastal dunes. Also, horizon scanning of new potentially effective compounds (e.g. triclopyr) and products (e.g. aquamaster, agridex) is often hindered by legal constraints.
As our experiment focused on individual shrubs, it offers prospects to more effectively control scattered clones which currently still represent a widespread type of infestation in Belgian dunes. However, in high density areas, almost entirely covered by B. aquifolium, a different management approach might be required for various reasons. The removal of large surface areas of high density B. aquifolium requires landscape scale measures that often involve mechanical removal with heavy machinery rather than manual removal. As a demonstration project, a heavily infested area with 100% B. aquifolium cover in the Noordduinen, was mechanically removed over a surface area of 350 m² in November 2013 using a 42 tons excavator equipped with a barred shovel aiming at sifting sand from plant material (Suppl. material
The potential of B. aquifolium to become invasive in Belgian dunes was already predicted by
On 1 January 2015 Regulation 1143/2014 on the prevention of the introduction and spread of invasive alien species (IAS) entered into force which prohibits trade and possession of invasive species on a Union List and enforces surveillance, rapid eradication, prevention and management actions on them. However, with the exception of B. halimifolia L. and A. altissima Swingle, none of the problematic shrub and tree species mentioned in this study, nor detrimental dune invasives such as Carpobrotus edulis (L.) L. Bolus or Acaena novae-zelandiae Kirk, are on the current list of regulated species. The drafting of a list of IAS of regional concern for Atlantic dunes could be a good alternative to prevent establishment of invasive species detrimental to this unique ecosystem and to prioritize action on already established invasives. The drafting of such regional lists should be based on sound risk assessment methodologies (
This work was carried out within the framework of the EU co-funded Interreg 2Seas project RINSE (Reducing the Impact of Non-Native Species in Europe) funded by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), which aimed at improving awareness of the threats posed by INNS and the methods to address them. We are grateful to the Agency for Nature and Forest (ANB) for permission and help with the organization, execution and funding of the mechanical removal demonstration. Bram D’hondt was supported by the EU co-funded SEFINS (Safeguarding the Environment From Invasive Non-Native Species) Interreg 2Seas cluster project, funded by the ERDF. This paper reflects the author’s views and the Programme Authorities are not liable for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. We thank Lise Verhaeghe for help with field work and Kathy Belpaeme for assistance. We are grateful to Katrin Schneider and Harald Auge for advice on management. We thank Sonia Vanderhoeven for comments on an earlier version of this manuscript and Wouter Van Landuyt for distribution and trend data and his support. We are grateful to three anonymous referees for their insightful comments on an earlier version of the manuscript.
Photos showing removal methods trialled on individual plant (clones) in this experiment
Data type: multimedia