Research Article |
Corresponding author: Ross N. Cuthbert ( rossnoelcuthbert@gmail.com ) Academic editor: Shana McDermott
© 2021 Ross N. Cuthbert, Angela C. Bartlett, Anna J. Turbelin, Phillip J. Haubrock, Christophe Diagne, Zarah Pattison, Franck Courchamp, Jane A. Catford.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Cuthbert RN, Bartlett AC, Turbelin AJ, Haubrock PJ, Diagne C, Pattison Z, Courchamp F, Catford JA (2021) Economic costs of biological invasions in the United Kingdom. In: Zenni RD, McDermott S, García-Berthou E, Essl F (Eds) The economic costs of biological invasions around the world. NeoBiota 67: 299-328. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.67.59743
|
Although the high costs of invasion are frequently cited and are a key motivation for environmental management and policy, synthesised data on invasion costs are scarce. Here, we quantify and examine the monetary costs of biological invasions in the United Kingdom (UK) using a global synthesis of reported invasion costs. Invasive alien species have cost the UK economy between US$6.9 billion and $17.6 billion (£5.4 – £13.7 billion) in reported losses and expenses since 1976. Most costs were reported for the entire UK or Great Britain (97%); country-scale cost reporting for the UK's four constituent countries was scarce. Reports of animal invasions were the costliest ($4.7 billion), then plant ($1.3 billion) and fungal ($206.7 million) invasions. Reported damage costs (i.e. excluding management costs) were higher in terrestrial ($4.8 billion) than aquatic or semi-aquatic environments ($29.8 million), and primarily impacted agriculture ($4.2 billion). Invaders with earlier introduction years accrued significantly higher total invasion costs. Invasion costs have been increasing rapidly since 1976, and have cost the UK economy $157.1 million (£122.1 million) per annum, on average. Published information on specific economic costs included only 42 of 520 invaders reported in the UK and was generally available only for the most intensively studied taxa, with just four species contributing 90% of species-specific costs. Given that many of the invasive species lacking cost data are actively managed and have well-recognised impacts, this suggests that cost information is incomplete and that totals presented here are vast underestimates owing to knowledge gaps. Financial expenditure on managing invasions is a fraction (37%) of the costs incurred through damage from invaders; greater investments in UK invasive species research and management are, therefore, urgently required.
Er bod costau uchel rhywogaethau ymledol yn cael eu nodi’n aml fel rhesymeg allweddol ar gyfer gweithredu polisïau a rheolaeth amgylcheddol, mae data syntheseiddiedig ar gostau ymlediad yn brin. Yma, rydym yn meintioli ac yn archwilio costau ariannol ymlediadau biolegol yn y Deyrnas Unedig (DU) gan ddefnyddio synthesis byd-eang o gostau ymlediadau cyhoeddedig. Mae rhywogaethau ymledol estron wedi costio rhwng UD$ 6.9 biliwn a $17.6 biliwn (£5.4 – £13.7 biliwn) i economi’r DU mewn colledion a threuliau ag adroddwyd ers 1976. Adroddwyd y mwyafrif o gostau ar gyfer y DU neu Brydain Fawr yn ei chyfanrwydd (97%) ac felly roedd adroddiadau costau i’r gwledydd unigol yn brin. Adroddiadau ar ymlediad anifeiliaid oedd yr ymlediadau mwyaf costus ($4.7 biliwn), yna planhigion ($1.3 biliwn), yna ffwng ($206.7 miliwn). Roedd costau difrod yr adroddwyd arnynt (h.y. heb gynnwys costau rheoli) yn uwch mewn amgylcheddau daearol ($4.8 biliwn) nag amgylcheddau dyfrol neu led-ddyfrol ($29.8 miliwn), gan effeithio’n bennaf ar amaethyddiaeth ($4.2 biliwn). Roedd ymledwyr â gyflwynwyd yn gynharach wedi cronni cyfanswm costau ymlediadau roedd yn uwch o lawer ‘na rhai a gyflwynwyd yn fwy diweddar. Mae costau ymlediadau wedi bod yn cynyddu’n gyflym ers 1976, gan gostio ar gyfartaledd $157.1 miliwn (£122.1 miliwn) y flwyddyn i economi’r DU. Dim ond ar gyfer 42 o’r 520 o rywogaethau ymledol a gyhoeddwyd costau economaidd penodol yn y DU, a hynny gan amlaf ar gyfer y tacsa a astudiwyd yn fwyaf dwys yn unig, gyda pedair rhywogaeth yn gyfrifol am 90% o’r costau penodol. O ystyried bod llawer o rywogaethau ymledol sydd heb ddata costau yn cael eu rheoli’n weithredol, awgrymir fod gwybodaeth am gostau yn anghyflawn a bod y cyfansymiau a gyflwynir yma ond yn amcangyfrif isel oblegid diffyg gwybodaeth. Mae gwariant ariannol ar reoli ymlediadau yn cynrychioli ffracsiwn (37%) o’r costau a achosir trwy ddifrod gan ymledwyr; felly mae angen buddsoddiadau ychwanegol ar reoli rhywogaethau ymledol y DU ar frys.
D’ainneoin gur minic a luaitear na costais arda a bhaineann le hionradh agus gur cúis an-tábhachtach iad le bainistiú agus polasaí comhshaoil, is annamh a fhaightear sonraí sintéisithe faoi chostais ionraidh. Sa pháipéar seo, measaimid ar bhonn cainníochtúil agus scrúdaímid costais airgeadaíochta ionraí bitheolaíochta sa Ríocht Aontaithe (RA) agus leas á bhaint againn as sintéis dhomhanda ar chostais ionraidh a thuairiscítear. Tá geilleagar na RA thíos idir SA$6.9 billiún agus $17.6 billiún (£5.4 – £13.7 billiún) le speicis choimhthíocha ionracha ó bhí 1976 ann maidir le caillteanais agus costais a tuairiscíodh. Is i gcás na RA nó i gcás na Breataine Móire a tuairiscíodh formhór na gcostas agus, mar sin de, is annamh a tuairiscíodh costais ar scála tíre. Ba iad tuairiscí ar ionraí ainmhithe ba mhó a raibh costais ag baint leo ($4.7 billiún), ansin ionraí plandaí ($1.3 billiún) agus ionraí fungasacha ($206.7 milliún). B’airde na costais damáiste a tuairiscíodh (.i. gan costais bhainistithe san áireamh) i dtimpeallachtaí talún ($4.8 billiún), agus tionchar acu seo, go príomha, ar an talmhaíocht ($4.2 billiún), ná i dtimpeallachtaí uisceacha nó leathuisceacha ($29.8 milliún). B’airde i bhfad na costais ionraidh a d’fhabhraigh ionróirí a tugadh isteach ar bhonn níos óige. Tá méadú tapa ag teacht ar chostais ionraidh ó bhí 1976 ann, agus $157.1 milliún (£122.1 milliún) de chostas ar gheilleagar na RA in aghaidh na bliana, ar an mheán mar gheall orthu. Níor chuimsigh eolas a foilsíodh faoi chostais gheilleagracha shonracha ach 42 de chuid na 520 ionróir a tuairiscíodh sa RA agus ní raibh sé ar fáil, go ginearálta, ach i gcás na dtacsón is mó a ndearnadh mionstaidéar orthu, agus gan ach ceithre speiceas bainteach le 90% de na costais sainspeicis. Nuair a chuirtear san áireamh go mbainistítear go gníomhach mórán de na speicis ionracha a bhfuil sonraí costas ina leith ar iarraidh agus go bhfuil tionchair an-aitheanta ag baint leo, tugann sé seo le fios go bhfuil an t-eolas a bhaineann le costais neamhiomlán agus gur meastacháin faoina luach ollmhóra iad, de bharr bearnaí eolais, na hiomláin a chuirtear i láthair anseo. Is cuid bheag (37%) de na costais a thabhaítear de bharr damáiste a dhéanann ionróirí is ea caiteachas airgeadais ar bhainistiú ionraí; tá géarghá, dá réir sin, le hinfheistíochtaí níos mó i mbainistiú speicis ionracha na RA.
Bien que les coûts élevés des invasions biologiques soient fréquemment évoqués et qu’ils constituent une motivation clé pour les politiques et la gestion environnementale, les données synthétiques sur ces coûts sont rares. Dans cette étude, nous quantifions et examinons le coût monétaire des invasions biologiques au Royaume-Uni (UK) à l’aide d’une synthèse globale des coûts effectivement reportés. Selon les informations disponibles sur les pertes et les dépenses depuis 1976, les espèces exotiques envahissantes ont coûté à l’économie de l’UK entre 6,9 et 17,6 milliards USD (entre 5,4 et 13,7 milliards £). La plupart des coûts proviennent de l’ensemble de la Grande Bretagne (97%) et, ainsi, les données à l’échelle de chaque pays sont rares. Les invasions animales sont les plus coûteuses (4,7 milliards USD), puis viennent les invasions végétales (1,3 milliard USD) et fongiques (206,7 millions USD). Les coûts des dégâts (i.e. en excluant les coûts de gestion) sont plus élevés dans les environnements terrestres (4,8 milliards USD) que dans les milieux aquatiques ou semi-aquatiques (29,8 millions USD), et concernent majoritairement l’agriculture (4,2 milliards USD). Les organismes envahissants avec des années d’introduction plus précoces sont ceux qui sont associés aux coûts les plus élevés. Le coût des invasions ont augmenté rapidement depuis 1976, avec un coût annuel moyen à l’économie anglaise de 157,1 millions USD (122,1 millions £). Les informations publiées sur des coûts espèce-spécifiques concernent seulement 42 des 520 organismes envahissants connus au Royaume-Uni, et sont généralement disponibles seulement pour les taxons les plus étudiés, avec seulement quatre espèces qui contribuent pour 90% des coûts espèces-spécifiques documentés. Compte tenu du nombre important d’espèces exotiques pour lesquelles il n’existe aucune donnée mais qui sont pourtant activement gérées pour leurs impacts parfaitement reconnus, cela suggère que les informations sur le coût des invasions biologiques sont incomplètes et que les totaux présentés ici sont largement sous-estimés à cause des lacunes de connaissance. Les dépenses liées à la gestion des invasions ne représentent qu’une fraction (37%) des coûts provoqués par les dégâts des espèces exotiques envahissantes. Des investissements plus importants en matière de gestion des espèces envahissantes en UK sont donc nécessaires et urgents pour limiter au maximum les impacts de ces invasions biologiques.
Aunque los altos costos de las invasiones se mencionan con frecuencia y son una motivación clave para la gestión y las políticas ambientales, aún las síntesis de datos de los costos de las invasiones son escasas. Aquí, cuantificamos y examinamos los costos monetarios de las invasiones biológicas en el Reino Unido (UK) utilizando una síntesis global de los costos reportados sobre invasiones biológicas. Las especies exóticas invasoras le han costado a la economía del Reino Unido entre US$6,9 mil millones y US$17,6 mil millones (£ 5.4 – £ 13.7 mil millones) en pérdidas y gastos reportados desde 1976. La mayoría de los costos se reportaron a la escala del Reino Unido o Gran Bretaña (97%) y, por lo tanto, la representación de informes de costos a escala individual de cada país dentro del Reino Unido fue escasa. Los informes de invasiones de animales fueron los más costosos ($4,7 mil millones), seguidos por las invasiones de plantas ($1,3 mil millones) y de hongos ($206,7 millones). Los costos de daños reportados (es decir, excluyendo los costos de gestión) fueron más altos en ambientes terrestres ($4.8 mil millones) que en ambientes acuáticos o semiacuáticos ($29.8 millones), afectando principalmente a la agricultura ($4.2 mil millones). Los invasores con introducciones más antiguas acumularon costos totales de invasión significativamente más altos. Los costos de invasión han aumentado rápidamente desde 1976, lo que le ha costado a la economía del Reino Unido unos $157,1 millones (£122,1 millones) por año, en promedio. La información publicada sobre costos económicos específicos incluyó sólo 42 de las 520 invasores reportados en el Reino Unido y generalmente estaba disponible solo para los taxones más estudiados, con solo cuatro especies contribuyendo con el 90% de los costos específicos de cada especie. Dado que muchas de las especies invasoras que carecen de datos de costos se gestionan activamente y tienen impactos bien conocidos, esto sugiere que la información de costos es incompleta y que los totales presentados aquí son subestimaciones enormes debido a lagunas de conocimiento. El gasto financiero en el manejo de invasiones es una fracción (37%) de los costos incurridos por los daños causados por los invasores; por lo tanto, se requieren con urgencia mayores inversiones en la gestión de especies invasoras del Reino Unido.
Obwohl die hohen Kosten biologischer Invasionen häufig aufgezeigt werden und eine wichtige Motivation für das Umweltmanagement und die Umweltpolitik darstellen, sind synthetisierte Daten rar. Hier quantifizieren und untersuchen wir die monetären Kosten biologischer Invasionen im Vereinigten Königreich anhand einer globalen Synthese der gemeldeten Invasionskosten. Invasive gebietsfremde Arten haben die britische Wirtschaft seit 1976 zwischen 6,9 und 17,6 Milliarden US-Dollar (5,4 bis 13,7 Milliarden Pfund) an gemeldeten Verlusten und Ausgaben gekostet. Die meisten Kosten wurden für das Vereinigte Königreich oder Großbritannien (97%) und damit für das gesamte Land gemeldet. Berichte über invasive Tiere waren die teuersten (4,7 Mrd. USD), gefolgt von Pflanzen (1,3 Mrd. USD) und Pilzen (206,7 Mio. USD). Die gemeldeten Schäden (d.h. ohne Verwaltungskosten) waren in terrestrischen Habitaten (4,8 Mrd. USD) höher als in aquatischen oder semi-aquatischen (29,8 Mio. USD) und wirkten sich hauptsächlich auf die Landwirtschaft aus (4,2 Mrd. USD). Invasoren mit früheren Einführungsjahren verursachten signifikant höhere Gesamtinvasionskosten. Die Invasionskosten sind seit 1976 rapide gestiegen und kosten die britische Wirtschaft durchschnittlich 157,1 Mio. USD (122,1 Mio. GBP) pro Jahr. Zu den veröffentlichten Informationen zu spezifischen wirtschaftlichen Kosten gehörten nur 42 von 520 im Vereinigten Königreich gemeldeten Invasoren, die im Allgemeinen nur für die am intensivsten untersuchten Taxa verfügbar waren, wobei nur vier Arten 90% der art-spezifischen Kosten beisteuern. Angesichts der Tatsache, dass viele der invasiven Arten, denen Kostendaten fehlen, aktiv verwaltet werden und allgemein anerkannte Auswirkungen haben, deutet dies darauf hin, dass die Kosteninformationen unvollständig sind und dass die hier dargestellten Summen aufgrund von Wissenslücken stark unterschätzt werden. Die finanziellen Ausgaben für das Management von Invasionen machen einen Bruchteil (37%) der Kosten aus, die durch Schäden durch Eindringlinge entstehen. Daher sind dringend größere Investitionen in das Management invasiver Arten im Vereinigten Königreich erforderlich.
England, InvaCost, invasive alien species, non-native species, Northern Ireland, published monetary impacts, Scotland, socioeconomic sector, Wales
Biological invasions can cause far-reaching ecological, environmental, social and economic impacts in invaded ranges (
Until recently, large-scale studies into the economic costs of invasive species have been limited to major geographic entities, such as the United States (
Despite invasive species being increasingly recognised as a concern for the UK government (
Overall, the economic costs of invasions for the UK lack a finer-scale, up-to-date synthesis across multiple environmental, social and temporal contexts, with different types of costs compiled in a comparable way. There have been few appraisals of the biases and knowledge gaps in cost reporting amongst invasive species, despite the presence of ‘flagship’ invaders in the UK that receive high attention from scientists and media outlets (
The need to comprehensively understand costs of invasive species on the UK economy is particularly crucial given their escalating numbers (
To address these knowledge gaps, we use UK-specific data from 1976 to 2020 in the InvaCost database (
Question 1: What is the reported economic cost of invasive species in the UK and how is it distributed amongst taxonomic groups, habitat types and socioeconomic sectors? Given its economic importance, we expect costs to be higher from species impacting agriculturally-intensive terrestrial environments.
Question 2: Are studies and recorded costs shared equally amongst all invasive species? We expect that most costs are caused by relatively few species and that these species are particularly well-known and studied, reflecting a positive feedback between documented costs and study effort.
Question 3: How do costs of invasions vary over time and are species with early introductions costlier than more recent invaders considering their introduction pathways? We expect that costs per species will increase with residence time, given a longer time period over which to accrue costs and that common introduction pathways will be dominant (e.g. ornamental;
Overall, answering these questions allows us to synthesise cost information across numerous ecological and socioeconomic contexts in the UK, helping to make informed current and future management strategies. Further, they will help in pointing out potential biases in available invasion-related cost data and guide further research avenues in this topic.
To estimate the cost of invasive species on the UK economy, we used UK-relevant cost data from the latest available version of the InvaCost database (version 3.0;
The period of estimation across reported costs varied considerably, spanning periods of several months to several years. In order to obtain comparable costs, we considered all costs for a period of less than a year as annual costs and re-calculated costs covering several years on an annual basis (i.e. costs accumulated over multiple years were divided amongst those years, giving annual cost estimates). Therefore, costs that spanned multiple years were divided equally amongst those years (e.g. a cost totalling $10,000 over ten years would equal $1,000 per year). If there was no evidence for a cost occurring in more than one year (i.e. One-time cost), we conservatively counted it for one year only and likewise for costs that were Potentially-ongoing (Occurrence column in InvaCost). In cases where the timespan for the costs was not described in the data publication, we used publication year as a surrogate for starting year and – if the cost was Potentially-ongoing – publication year as a surrogate for ending year.
The conversion of all costs into an annual basis resulted in a total of 709 expanded entries (Suppl. material
We categorised the invasion costs using seven criteria. The first two criteria were used to filter and subset the costs and the other five were used in analysis. See Suppl. material
We calculated full costs, which include potential and low reliability estimates, but excluded these more speculative estimates when examining the data in detail (as well as for the following subsections). The more detailed, conservative analysis, therefore, considered only the following descriptors:
To identify the proportions of invasive species in the UK for which cost data are available, the list of individual species in InvaCost was compared with comprehensive lists of invasive species in the UK. Lists of known invasive species were extracted and compiled for the UK from the following databases: (1) InvaCost version 3.0; (2) the Global Invasive Species Database (GISD); (3) the sTwist database; and (4) the Great Britain Non-native Species Information Portal (GB-NNSIP) (Table
Initial numbers of known invasive species extracted from the InvaCost, GISD, sTwist and GB-NNSIP databases for the UK. Definitions of invasiveness are provided in relation to each database, along with underlying sources of data extracted.
Database | Species (n) | Invasive definition | Data source |
---|---|---|---|
InvaCost | 42 | Invasive alien species with reported economic impacts. | Version 3.0, |
GISD | 216 | Alien species with known negative impacts on biodiversity in the region where they are invasive. | GISD (www.iucngisd.org/gisd). |
sTwist | 321 | A taxon whose introduction and/or spread threatens biological diversity (Convention on Biological Diversity). | Version 1.2.3, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3763222. Underlying data sources: Caphina et al. (2017); GAVIA ( |
GB-NNSIP | 282 | An introduced taxon designated as having a negative ecological or human impact. |
|
Rank-abundance analyses were used to determine the unevenness of species’ costs according to cost types (management and damage), environments (aquatic, semi-aquatic and terrestrial) and kingdoms (plants and animals).
A keyword search on the Web of Science over the period 1960 to 2020 was used to quantify research effort (i.e. publication numbers) towards individual species listed as invasive in the UK (Table
We used a Kruskal-Wallis test to compare research efforts for invasive species that were present vs. absent from InvaCost. This tested the null hypothesis that research effort was equal across species with and without published impact costs. We also used linear regression to test the relationship between species’ total economic costs and their research effort, on a log10 scale to normalise residuals and homogenise variances. Here, a significant positive relationship would indicate that greater invasion costs are reported for invasive species with larger numbers of studies.
The cost over time of all UK invasive species was calculated via the summarizeCosts function of the ‘invacost’ R package (
Using first record information from the sTwist database, we used linear regression to examine the relationship between the length of time a species has been reported as invasive in the UK and its total invasion cost. First record information was available for 35 species reported in InvaCost (of the 42 species with individual cost entries). Both time since introduction and total economic costs were modelled on a log10 scale to normalise residuals and homogenise variances. We thus tested whether species with an earlier year of introduction accrued greater impacts than species that were introduced more recently. For each species and year of introduction, we also examined introduction pathway information (Suppl. material
Biological invasions cost the UK economy an amount estimated from $6.9 billion to $17.6 billion (£5.4 billion – £13.7 billion) between 1976 and 2019. The lower, more conservative cost estimate excludes Potential costs ($5.2 billion; £4.0 billion; 103 entries) and Low reliability costs ($5.5 billion; £4.3 billion; 101 entries). We use the more conservative estimates for all further analyses below (538 entries).
Of the total for the whole of the UK, $4.3 billion (£3.3 billion) was attributed to the UK and $2.4 (£1.9 billion) billion to Great Britain. Much lower cost totals were recorded per country, with $81.5 million (£63.3 million) to Northern Ireland, $76.2 million (£59.2 million) to England, $34.9 million (£27.1 million) to Scotland and $2.4 million (£1.9 million) to Wales. Therefore, the vast majority of invasion costs were reported at larger spatial scales.
Where costs were assigned to specific taxa, the majority were attributed to animals ($4.7 billion, 267 entries; including $2.4 billion to mammals and $1.5 billion to insects), followed by plants ($1.3 billion, 99 entries) and then fungi ($206.7 million, 2 entries). Invasive chromists (16 entries) and viruses (10 entries) cost $771,575 and $775,451, respectively. However, a large sum of invasion costs in the UK was either not taxonomically defined or spanned multiple kingdoms (i.e. Diverse/Unspecified; $781.6 million, 144 entries).
Terrestrial habitats were most impacted overall ($6.4 billion, 245 entries) and had the highest number of cost entries. Impacts to aquatic ($258.5 million, 116 entries) and semi-aquatic habitats ($51.7 million, 86 entries) were, respectively, one and two orders of magnitude lower (Fig.
Alluvial plot illustrating flows of identified invasion cost types in the UK amongst environments and socioeconomic sectors. Abbreviations: bn is billion (2017 US$).
The costliest impacts of invasions in the UK were incurred by the agricultural sector ($4.9 billion, 32 entries), followed by authorities and stakeholders (i.e. governmental services and/or official organisations, $955.9 million, 436 entries), mixed sectors ($824.6 million, 41 entries), as well as forestry ($144.2 million, 11 entries). Public and social welfare ($37.8 million, 10 entries), fisheries ($11.0 million, 5 entries) and the environment ($7.8 million, 3 entries) were reportedly impacted to a much lesser degree. Agricultural, mixed and forestry impacts were typically incurred through direct damage or losses to resources, whilst impacts to authorities and stakeholders were mostly related to management expenditure. Across these sectors and cost types, terrestrial environments were dominant, with relatively few contributions from aquatic and semi-aquatic environments overall in terms of invasion costs. In contrast to terrestrial environments, where costs were mostly damage-related, aquatic and semi-aquatic costs were more likely to be from management actions (Fig.
Overall, cost data in the UK were reported for 42 invasive species in InvaCost (with individual cost entries; n = 56 including species within ‘mixed’ entries). However, there were 520 unique invasive species in the UK reported in InvaCost, sTwist, GISD or GB-NNSIP, thus meaning that approximately 8% of known invasive species in the UK have documented economic costs (Fig.
Barplots showing a total numbers of all known invasive species in the UK (i.e. species within GISD, sTwist and GB-NNSIP) and UK invasive species in InvaCost; and b proportions of UK invasive species in InvaCost across classes.
Cost contributions were highly uneven across species overall (Fig.
Whittaker plots illustrating ranked proportional cost contributions across species for a overall b management c damage d aquatic e semi-aquatic f terrestrial g plant and h animal cost categories. The top three highest-contributing species are labelled on each subplot, for example, the European rabbit ranks as the costliest species a overall, for c damage costs and amongst the terrestrial organisms (f) and animal kingdom (h), representing 62%, 82%, 66% and 77% of costs in the respective categories. Note the differences in x-axes scaling.
Aquatic environments were mostly impacted by floating pennywort (Hydrocotyle ranunculoides) (45%) and Canadian pondweed (Elodea canadensis) (16%), thereafter waterweed (Elodea nuttallii). Semi-aquatic taxa costs were mostly driven by the ruddy duck (Oxyura jamaicensis) (55%), coypu (Myocastor coypus) and American mink (Neovison vison). Costs in terrestrial environments were driven predominantly by the European rabbit (66%), Japanese knotweed and rock pigeon. Overall, the majority of species with monetary costs (83%) each contributed less than 1% of the respective total cost (Fig.
Invasive species with economic costs were associated with significantly more publications than UK invasive species without costs (χ2 = 32.79, df = 1, p < 0.001; Suppl. material
Per-species invasion costs and study efforts showing a the number of publications available in Web of Science for the period 1960–2020 for each species with InvaCost records against the total cost for each species in billion US$ (2017 value; log10 scale; shaded area is 95% confidence interval) b the distribution of the number of publications available in Web of Science for the period 1960–2020 for each species with invasion costs by organism group (“# species” refers to numbers of species in InvaCost within that group) and c distribution of publication numbers of invasive species with and without costs.
In examining the raw cost trends over time, between 1976 and 2019, the accumulated costs of $6.9 billion ($157.1 million per year; £5.4 billion and £122.1 million, respectively) increased steadily until 2005, being between $411,987 (1976–1985) and $1.7 million (1986–1995) per year until 1995. Costs then grew rapidly to between $338.7 million and $350.0 million per year after 1995 (Fig.
Annual average costs of biological invasions in the United Kingdom, considering decadal means (except 2016 to 2019: four years mean). Grey points indicate annual total costs. Note the y-axis is on a log10 scale.
Of the 35 UK invasive species present in InvaCost with first record information, there was high variation in species’ costs ($18,300 to $2.12 billion) and minimum residence times (9 to 885 years; time since first record of introduction; Fig.
Invasion costs (US$ billions) as a function of number of years since introduction for UK invasive species. Note that both the x- and y-axes are on a log10 scale. The dashed line represents a linear regression model fit and the shaded area the 95% confidence interval. Pathways of introduction per species are indicated by different fill shapes and colours.
Of the five specified pathways of UK invasive species introductions, species introduced via the ornamental pathway were most common (12 species), followed by escapes (3 species); almost half of species were introduced via multiple (diverse) or unspecified pathways (17 species). In turn, diverse and unspecified pathways contributed the greatest costs ($2.8 billion), followed by escapes ($0.49 billion) and ornamental species ($0.17 billion). There was, however, generally no trend between pathway prevalence and minimum residence time for the assessed UK invasive species (Fig.
Biological invasions have cost the UK economy at least $6.9 billion (£5.4 billion) since 1976 and possibly at least $17.6 billion (£13.7 billion) if we include low reliability and potential costs (
Invasion costs were mostly reported at UK or Great Britain scales and, thus, further cost reporting is required at country-level scales or lower within the UK to improve and pinpoint management actions. Most costs stemmed from direct damage rather than management spending and principally impacted the agriculture sector. This dominance of damage-related costs over management aligns with trends in other geographic regions worldwide (
Reported management costs were substantially lower than reported damage costs. Management costs were primarily incurred by authorities and stakeholders that are responsible for ecosystem management practices in the UK, rather than through primary sectors (e.g. agriculture and forestry). Aquatic and semi-aquatic invaders were more likely to incur management costs than direct damage, but the converse was true for terrestrial species. A study by
More effective and coordinated management strategies are required to help limit future invasion costs in the UK, particularly in the terrestrial realm where damages are most burgeoning. Such management strategies should consider the range of pathways through which costly invaders have established (
Similar to prior estimates of UK invasion costs (
Across all habitat types and taxonomic groups, where reported, invasion costs in the UK were always dominated by very few species. Similar trends have been found in other countries, with costs dominated by few species in, for example, Italy (
The Tens Rule hypothesizes that, where 10% of introduced species invade, 10% of those species naturalise and 10% of those become invasive (
We also note that, because species present as part of ‘mixed’ cost entries were excluded from species-specific analyses here, numbers of invaders with costs would be higher with their inclusion (totalling 56 species with these ‘grouped’ costs). Nevertheless, the biases in cost reporting evidenced here were due to sustained focus on a few species, notwithstanding the substantial number of invasive species that are absent from InvaCost. In particular, mammals represented the class with the greatest proportion of reported invasive species with costs, despite not being the most diverse group of invaders in the UK (
Cost reporting is lacking for many less notorious invasive species, evidenced by the relationship between those species with reported costs also having a greater number of studies. In the UK, some of the most notorious invaders that feature in targeted management campaigns do not have accessible cost data. The killer shrimp (Dikerogammarus villosus) and quagga mussel (Dreissena bugensis) have no reported costs in the UK in InvaCost, despite being amongst ‘keystone’ invasive species targeted through management campaigns, such as Check, Clean, Dry (
Overall, relative to three of the most robust databases of invasive species in the UK and beyond (sTwist, GISD and GB-NNSIP), numbers of species represented in InvaCost comprised less than one tenth and the few which are present reflect a bias towards intensively studied invasive species. These numbers also exclude species that are not yet reported as being alien in the UK or those that are introduced or naturalised and not invasive; the mismatch between numbers of invaders present and numbers economically appraised is therefore likely to be vast.
Over half of invaders with individual costs and first records have only been present in the UK for under 100 years. Despite marked species-specific variabilities, our results show that taxa present for longer (i.e. > 100 years) generally have more potential to accrue invasion costs, further highlighting that early-stage management measures are likely to be most cost-effective (
Although our overall average annual cost estimate for the whole of the UK since 1976 ($157.1 million; £122.1 million) and, even in the most recent years, is considerably lower than previous estimates (GB: £1.7 billion;
Costs have been rising over time and species with longer residence times had higher costs. Even without further invasions, this means that costs in future will continue to accumulate (signalling an invasion economic impact debt;
Despite long-standing knowledge of ecological impacts of invasive species in the UK (
The authors acknowledge the French National Research Agency (ANR-14-CE02-0021) and the BNP-Paribas Foundation Climate Initiative for funding the InvaCost project that allowed the construction of the InvaCost database. The present work was conducted following a workshop funded by the AXA Research Fund Chair of Invasion Biology and is part of the AlienScenario project funded by BiodivERsA and Belmont-Forum call 2018 on biodiversity scenarios. RNC acknowledges funding from the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation. AB acknowledges funding from the Natural Environmental Research Council (grant no. NE/L002485/1). CD was funded by the BiodivERsA-Belmont Forum Project “Alien Scenarios” (BMBF/PT DLR 01LC1807C). We acknowledge Dr. Gethin Thomas for assistance with Welsh translations, ROS Educational Consultancy Ltd & Garnock Media Ltd for assistance with Irish translations, Dr. Gauthier Dobigny for assistance with French translations, and Dr. Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia for assistance with Spanish translations.
Subset of InvaCost database used for analyses of UK invasion costs. Note that cost data are not annualised.
Data type: database
Summary of the content of the descriptive columns of the database used in this study (adapted from
Data type: explanation
Web of Science search terms for UK invasive species publication numbers, alongside resulting study numbers
Data type: database
Total costs of species with individual cost entries, alongside first record years and introduction pathways
Data type: database
Figure S1
Data type: figure
Explanation note: Boxplots of the number of publications recorded in Web of Science for species listed as invasive in the United Kingdom (UK) in the Global Invasive Species Database (GISD), sTwist database and Great Britain Non-native Species Information Portal (GB-NNSIP), but with no specific cost records in InvaCost (beige) and for invasive species with cost records in the UK in InvaCost (green).